**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Comments
Danger Rooms : Rarity Restriction.
Nick Fury's Intel Missions : Tag Restriction.
We have already allowed it to happen for quite some time now.
As mentioned many times, I'm not supportive of the 4* ban but after reading what @DarthHaas posted above, the 5* restriction makes sense. If we look at Class Restriction based on Variant alone, despite that restriction, people were exploring variant less than a week after it was released.
Also, it is not as though Kabam gated the benefits of Cavalier behind the exploration of 6.1. Personally I find that 6.1 made the loopholes of our 5/6* rosters more glaring, loopholes that we have been making do with 4*s because they are so readily available and given out like candy.
If we look further ahead, let's say 6.2 is twice the difficulty of 6.1 (similar to how 5.2 was to 5.1), will we still be able to use 4*s to make do? No one will know. But the steadfast approach is to build up your 5* roster and 6.1 is a good place to start at with the myriad of nodes and opponents.
In addition, with the insane 5/6* drop rates from the Cavalier crystals, I believe the "roster building phase" will not be too long or difficult to overcome. Before anyone screams "moneygrab", spending has been and will always be optional. All games reward spenders with time saved, and expecting F2P players to progress as fast as spenders is just not realistic without major effort being put in by the F2P players.
also any champ bans are bad imo. if someone can do content with 2*, let him do it
Are the Cavalier crystals going to reflect the same time certain champions are permanently added to the PHC, Basic 5*, and Basic 6* crystal pools alike?
As far as I know 3* are still restricted from act 6 also.
“ it clearly shows that u don’t value our views”
They’ve proven their disregard for our views and feedback over and over. At this point, all I can do is spread the (already common knowledge) word via reddit and line and not spend a dime.
first off 85 5*’s and 11 6* and you spend money on the game. Of course you understand where the f2p players are coming from. All us measly pheasants who have to grind are lucky if we even have half of that roster.
You don't care for the restriction because it has very little affect on you, maybe it might of caused a slight annoyance because you lost a synergy or two, but seriously. Then in the same post you are berating people because they want to use their 4* you state they should of seen it coming and changed their game play, you say you are worried about the 6* restriction. Why are you worried because you only got 11 ? The restrictions and possible match ups mean you won't have counters ? well dam maybe you should change your style of play and stop relying on 5*
I think the reaction this got was well justified. Saying people should of waited before reacting is also not true when the issue is so widely disliked. From what i have gathered over these pages even those who don't mind or have tried to give the opposite viewpoint, if given the choice would have kabam remove the restriction or disagree with it being used a gating barrier.
Going through the content I can see so many very specific mechanics and match ups that there is a very limited number of champions that can handle those matches effectively. So 100% exploration definitely will take some time and require some good luck on crystals for a lot of players.
Kabam said they aiming to improve the accumulation of 5* and resources to rank them and we have seen some of those changes so we will see things stack up over the coming months.
Also i did read something about someone saying Kabam didn't have enough time to inform the community any sooner then the week they gave us. Well i disagree with that seeing as i'm pretty sure they would of gone into the development of Act6 with the idea of restricting it to 5/6* from the offset which is clear from Kabam Mikes post regarding future restrictions with X no of 5/6*s which i would take to mean chapter 2/3 or 4, which we won't see for months. So kabam had ample opportunity to inform the community or even using one of the many side events they released (such as the maze) to apply this restriction and gain feedback would of been the best way to have approached this.
overall variant was more interesting for me
also if devs would've care about balance, there wouldn't be such a gigantic gap between god tier champs and trash ones. as it is now, you only need some luck to have double immune champ to take down crossbones
People probably won't like it, but no one likes being excluded from something. Doesn't mean it's not necessary.
Sir if you disagree with him could at least do so in a respectful manner. I know you and others are not excited about 4*s are banned from Act 6, but find it inappropriate how you guys are treating others who disagree with your position.