**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
The Infinite Refresh of CN region Negative Space Discussion [Merged Threads]
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
the fact that players should regulate themselves doesnt mean kabam can take a rest and not improve their description. like i said, im actually trying to help kabam in this case. if you want to minimize things like this happen in the future, dont create loopholes
- You have not experienced what it’s like to be a politician. So you are not allowed to have an opinion about them, or what they do.
- You have not experienced building a car. So you are not allowed to have an opinion about any of the companies who make them.
- You have not experienced running a school system. So you are not allowed to have an opinion about one.
If you have a point to make that has anything to do with this issue, then you know I've already responded about the Gems.
Here was the announcement that Miike posted then.
My guess is it might be handled the same way.
my discussion in fact directly addresses this issue. In this thread, I offered the suggestion that on the one hand, yes, players should regulate themselves. however, we can;t control everyone's mind and behavior; like several others have mentioned, there will always be people who find ways to exploit. therefore, on the other hand, it is in kabam's best interest to minimize the flaws and improve the description, so that the next time someone breaks the rules, we have clear evidence. i think the arguments are pretty clear.
meanwhile, regarding your "firm" attitude against people who exploit, i dont buy it, because your response to people who exploited 2015 rank-up gem says otherwise.
Kabam, please look into this matter because it's provides any teams doing this a significant advantage.
in addition, the 2015 rank-up exploitation was used as a precedent and analogy, so it is relevant. unfortunately, it just also happened to show that you're hypocrite, because in no way you are firm against game exploitation.
lastly, this is also a good lesson for you. i hope you stick to your own words. when you jump into other people's thread next time, MAKE SURE you are not trying to create strawman arguments by diverting any issues
The 2015 Rank Up gem issue for Variant #1 was badly handled IMO. Although it affected a small group of end-end game players who could 100% Variant in 1-2 days, the overall perception given is that punishment dealt is selectively dependant on who infringes them.
However, from another point of view, R4 gems are, in essence, T2A, which players who could 100% Variant in 1-2 days have generally no big issue acquiring. So it is a big deal to us, but from a macro game balance perspective, it isn't to Kabam (or at least that's what is implied by not reversing the rank ups).
Recall the 2.5/6k T5C rank up package that was sold a couple of months back, where the outflow of T5C was accidentally given, because it was end-end game resource, items were clawed back. Similarly, because T5B and 6* shards available in bounties are end game resources currently, there is a pretty high chance that whoever participated in the exploit will have the rewards clawed back.
you also selectively ignored that my statement on this issue . let me repeat it for you
In this thread, I offered the suggestion that on the one hand, yes, players should regulate themselves. however, we can;t control everyone's mind and behavior; like several others have mentioned, there will always be people who find ways to exploit. therefore, on the other hand, it is in kabam's best interest to minimize the flaws and improve the description, so that the next time someone breaks the rules, we have clear evidence of them doing so.