**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Thank you for finally adding a disagree button!!!
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
In many ways, the best measure of a member of a community doesn't come from the people who agree with him or her, it comes from the people who disagree with him or her. Anyone can get people who agree with them to like them. But I think earning the respect, or at least the lack of enmity from the people who disagree, says more.
I don't agree with most of what you say, but the flagging was out of control.
Edit: directed toward GW
Edit 2: I say this as a former admin of a forum. It's a pain in the ace to wade through unnecessary flags.
1- being a moderation tool it would have been used solely by moderators, and not made public.
2- if it was a mod tool, and public, then they used it terribly given as you were so far free to derail every topic of the forum (and dont take it personal, i have no clue who you are but i ve read my fair share of topics to have noticed your trend over and ober repeating again)
3- The “LoL” option has been and will alwais be the downvote equivalent. Aside clicking lol on a joke, the hundreds of “LoL” someone earned are a quite precise clue of the overall thought about the poster, being it “we dont take you seriously cause what you say isnt remotely trustable”.
Unless you re a joke magician or live just on the meme thread, that s a good measure too.
4- im pretty sure aswell the downeating was removed due to your specific behaviour.
2. The Moderators do their job. Claiming someone derails and calling their words Spam doesn't count unless that's actually the case. It's their job to tell the difference.
3. LOL has never counted towards metrics. I have no comment towards the rest of that.
4. I've always respected the Flags for what their intended purpose was. So no. It wasn't my fault.
2- they do when it is convenient to do so as in any game. Else you would not see main bugs issues going for pages and pages without answer and a simple “hey i dropped this champ ty kabam” being answered without problem.
Leaving moderation up to a flag system is pretty much like running beta testing live and not on a beta server.
Oh wait.
3- how very convenient of you. But let’s suppose we are talking about rankup materials and you ppst something getting 50 “lols”.
Would you think you cracked a joke by accident, or that people are considering your post hilarious for mayyyybe some other reason? I will leave the answer up to your common sense.
4- true. You are and were alwais able up to today to safely navigate on the borders of that. But istigation to something is in my eyes as bad as doing that something. And the many times you literally force your opinions on grounds you do not know about, causing uprising and usually ending up in a troll war and the thread closing is, again in my eyes, the same thing. Which leads me back to first points where i state Mods do not alwais do their jobs.
I have been a Mod for a VERY well known and wide game made by a VERY big AAA company and i can understand how hard and tiring it can be.
There is alwais a thin line between keeping “complainers” at bay or stepping into the “censoring” territory hence going too far as a Mod.
But the same applies to the opposite situation. Extremely complacent people sticking to supporting the company even in absurd scenarios were alwais the main reasons for uprising on forums, and were silenced and moderated as fast as complainers. Which doesnt happen here.
Too much bad or too much good are both bad on online forums. What you want here is balance between who complains and who supports to the point of being seen as “puppets”. When you punish the first but let go the second, not only you re doing a poor mod job, but you also literally letting the main cause of uprising stay around and literally making your job harder and more painful.
I mean how would you feel involved into a topic talking about 6.2, 6.1 or variant if you did not run or yet even gotten access to that content?
By definition being involved means wanting to share one’s thoughts about a common experience and confront opinions, but how can you if you did not have said experience?
I mean i could post here all topics you joined, derailed to closure which were talking about something your current ingame capability has not yet allowed you to try out, but that would mean going through at least 70% of your 7k posts...
And i am not a masochist.
Feel free tho to explain me the rest.
And sorry, somehow cant edit first post.
I suggest you to start paying attention to it then, cause you may finally understand why you arr the only user on these forums being treated the way you are. Not a single other user ever had the “problems” you did, to the point mods had to remove flagging completely from forums.
The "flag" button hasnt meant what it's supposed to mean for well over a year. It wasnt disabled because of him, it was disabled because it wasnt being used like was supposed to be used..
At the end of the day, the stars are more in line with people who simply post a lot. Regardless of what you post, you're bound to earn yourself points (assuming you're not banned)...
It's one thing to defend yourself, I get that. A lot of what is thrown your way is grossly unnecessary from the community. I know you post your thoughts and they aren't always popular. I've read most of them. And that's when I usually stop reading the thread because it instantly turns into page after page of back and forth you insist on partaking in.
It's another thing to defend yourself in a video game forum online. You're surrounded by trolls who have nothing better to do than to bait. Yes they attack, but what exactly are you defending yourself from? Your honor? Your pride? It's a chat forum with a similar civility to global chat...
That said and as someone said before me, this was merely proving the point of flag / no flag points/no points being flawed.
I could be like you and keep answering or pointing out your contraddictions and in the span of a week i would probably have a 5* account!
But alas it was a mere test of how you are able to turn anything you put words on in a Contest of Pointlessness.
For once that we derailed thread and it wasnt you, i am very curious to see what happens, as further test.
Too good can be too bad remember?
My point is that I do agree with you. If this played out in person there's no way it would have devolved to this point. The anonymity of the interwebs brings out the worst in too many.