**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
Mauled Guardian
Comments
-
7* are brand new and are going to be ‘overpriced’ for a while. The thing that is being pushed right now is 6R5s, of which there’s frankly an obscene amount on offer. You can get something like 10-12 R5s if you whale out completely this week.
-
I see no spittle
-
I honestly wouldn’t pay 3k unless it came awakened with the rank up materials as well.
-
Surfer does like the sig level unfortunately so short term that’s a bit of a miss for you. Still, he has good immunities and buffs so he’s not terrible unawakened. My R3 Surfer is still one of the better Peni counters in bg, he’s got an sp2 that can catch you off guard very easily as well. He’s an extremely well balanced…
-
^ this. If you need units and are going to open 100k bc you’re going to have better odds of not getting unlucky by opening 2k crystals. Essentially the more bc you open the more equal the results will become
-
If I’m doing arena I’ll use them to speed me through milestones. I never go further than that anyway
-
I’d be disappointed if I had to spend £50 to get 7* but they don’t look outrageous tbf. Equally, it doesn’t really make much difference to me as I have a wedding to save for anyway 😂
-
They have been banning players over the weekends too, in fairness to Kabam on the Bg front they’ve put in a hell of a lot of effort in banning accounts, especially at the higher tiers where reward brackets are a bit finer.
-
As Pikolu has said, Kabam have been actively perm-banning accounts all season in bgs. A lot of them were big accounts from fairly prominent alliances too.
-
War rewards have been and gone and war is going to be down for the next couple of weeks so it’s not really a priority. From what I know something went a bit squiffy on the front end side but it’s not impacted our loot or anything like that.
-
It’s a difficult question really. I always advocate depth because you can cover more content that way and you’ll get better with different champions which is an important part of the game. If you’re interested in bgs you definitely need a wider roster so getting more R3s is going to help in that regard.
-
If you’re only thinking of rewards, at the moment the priority should be based around BG, especially if you’re not in a top 20-30 AQ alliance. It is a very loaded question though, everyone is different. My personal priorities are AW and BG, and I think that the people in alliances that prioritise AQ are crazy. I dare say…
-
Don’t worry it’ll only cost you 50k to get your 7* to sig200
-
7* are the premium resource right now so they’re going to be overpriced. The rank up materials however are a very good deal so I take my wins where I can.
-
I would advise creating a ticket with support if you haven’t received them yet.
-
Curious, out of those who are proposing a class-action, how many of you are still playing every day? I’d probably put good money on 99%. Kabam are guilty of being careless in their content releases and there are things that all of us wish they would do better. Ultimately Kabam own the account. That being said, this is one…
-
If you’re excellent with Tigra, do Tigra. Otherwise Rintrah will be likely be better if you’ve not mastered her.
-
If this is true, I’ll guarantee that it’s an oversight from their system rather than a conscious decision, after all they could have just not banned these people if they were concerned about lost revenue. I’m not excusing this if it is the case, I think it’s pretty poor form to not have these accounts excluded from…
-
Congrats on the masters, this season has been extremely dysfunctional in terms of matchups. How alliances with 113-148 deaths across a season can somehow sneak into top 10 is a joke. That’s real bottom end masters level, and looking at this season’s leaderboard, P1 standard.
-
He’s referring to the EoP paths, combined with the Carina challenges, not individual fights.
-
From what I’ve seen of them they’re not a true masters alliance, perhaps they’re good enough to scrape it if they were facing masters alliances, but they’re certainly not good enough for top 10, let alone top 3 which is likely where they’re going to place with another east matchup and DSVG/Salty matching. For what it’s…
-
Can you show the rest of your roster? Looks like a LS is hiding there and idk how you’re lv60 without more champs so share and we can advise!
-
I think that this is a reasonable solution to the issue, though I think that 7.5k 6* shards for GT40 is a joke tbh. I don’t think anyone in P4+ is that bothered by that, let alone #1 alliance in the world, who let’s remember put 1000% effort in to get where they are, so saying things like oh well, or just take your foot…
-
They will help as well. They sorted me out in Miike’s Revenge last year.
-
Herc, Prof X, Stryfe, potentially Kate, Miles (at least for AoL).
-
If you’d have lost one person I’d say fair enough, but 10 most likely puts you in one of a few alliances who are notorious for their members’ extra-curricular antics. Don’t get me wrong, I have got some sympathy for you - it’s a crummy feeling, I lost out on a masters finish due to a bad apple last year. But to have…
-
I like your assumption that a senior Netmarble exec has any real idea of the relative strengths and weaknesses of enough champions in each class to make the decision that Claire is too much for the current pool. I’m still not sure how Claire was even winning it considering the other options.
-
Roster size, as in 1m+ etc. isn’t the most important thing in most alliances. It’s probably a good way to filter the total newbies out but not much more. At P3 there’s probably three main types of alliance - - High tier AQ alliances who do casual war and get P3 pretty much by dint of the fact they’ve got huge rosters which…
-
This war doesn’t count towards your points but it does count towards your war rating. At this stage it should just be cancelled IMO. It’s going to screw alliances on the borders of tiers and at the masters level where your results are taken into account for your matchups as well it’s going to create havoc. DSVG, who to be…