TheNepper ★
Reactions
Comments
-
@ChaosMax1012 If kabam would want a totally new kit why would they do it with an existing champ? Especially if they expect backslash, it just doesn't make sense, they can introduce that kit on any other new champ.
-
I wonder what game mode are you thinking of when you are talking about what she WOULD counter. Because if just in general, she DOES counter these champs you have listed right now as 5*. If you talk about war, you cannot use her vs tactic champ this season, but otherwise she is usable, you don't have to worry about time…
-
It works now like that because of concussion. If it would be removed, you would bleed from evade as well.
-
Not if they handle them as separate champs. Imagine you have to create a new champ, but instead of starting from scratch/zero, you just ctrl+c ctrl+v first, then change whatever you would have change anyway.
-
I understand that, I just wanted to provide some details (without my take) because it seemed to me that most players do not understand the tune down. But since you ask, I would prefer to have my current 5* quake as is. Again as I mentioned I do not use her often nowadays, but when I do I use her for a reason. My take is…
-
This kind of question came up a lot on this thread, so I just wanted to provide some info about what does taking away concussion affect exactly. So lots just think Quake is OP because you can ignore hitting the enemy. While it is pretty good in itself, she's true strenght is that she has -100% aar while charging heavy,…
-
About the concern of being different 5* and 6* toolkit might confusing people: There is a very easy solution, we would have a quake classic (up to 5*) and a quake tweaked (6*+) (just as if they would be different characters, but it could be the same in-game character model with different kits). You can even add a different…
-
Everyone's premise who is voting to 'adjust' her is that nobody uses her anymore which is far from the truth. Back in the old days I used her 99% of the fights and I agree it is completely broken that I was able to do it (however I always thought higher skill ceiling should payoff somehow). Nowadays I rarely use her, but I…
-
I just want to bring up a point. Getting catalysts for 6* r3s are not an issue for ages now (100+ t5b, t2a are always in my overflow). The main problem lately for me why I try to carefully rank up champs is gold and iso. I am not tip-top 0.01%, but consider myself endgame player. My roster always feel behind just because I…
-
STOP TRIVIALIZING CONTENT! Everest content is designed to make us buy them odins, STOP WITH THE ALTERNATIVE WAYS :# for realz
-
I agree, but they should recalculate it nevertheless. Else they end season early and give these allys masters rewards, would that be fair?
-
I don't think season should be cancelled. The issue only seems to be with point multiplier, NOT with matchmaking that is based on war rating. As long as kabam fixes points by the end of season, it should be alright imo.
-
By your logic if science class would only consist of 10 champs, you only had 1/10 chance of pulling your desired one with an abyss. :)
-
Yupp, you are totally right my bad. Also now that I think of it, my answer is totally incorrect :| (because the 'order' of the 10 does not matter) So to correct myself, this is how to calc it, exactly as you have said before: I will use the notation (n k) for n choose k (which is n! / (k! * (n-k)!) ) - For 1 crystal the…
-
I do not think so unfortunatelly. I am a 17.3k 2mil very-very occasionally spender, I currently play top p3 ally top 70 AQ. I always pursued to play on the very top level, but with these deals coming like quarterly now it is further and further away. AQ is impossible to play competitively unless spending by design. AW…
-
Just to point out the 29% theory is not that bad, the problem is that those odds are not independent, you would need to have used inclusion-exclusion principle if you calculate the odds of pulling him instead of the odds of not pulling him. See when you say 1/38 + 1/37 + ... you ignore the fact that it is impossible to…
-
I am a mathematician. I did not see the correct answer yet, so: For 1 crystal the chance that you do not get him is: 37/38 * 36/38 * ... * 28/38 which is roughly 0.2013 (20.13% chance). For 8 crystals it is: 0.2013^8 = 0.000002696 (which is 0.00027%) that is extremely low chance.
-
How about the fight duration scoring? :) Still 15k
-
I am more concerned with the trajectory of this, for sure they cannot catch everyone. But there are more and more in my experience. People write things like this on forums because they are frustrated by the situation. As for this guy's comment, I am not sure for example why they needed to remove it. Since yesterday…
-
I see, thanks makes sense. For me the bigger difference seemed that I can write description as well in the customer support link. There are lots of cheaters I faced who play it "smart" where it is obvious with attached reasoning in my opinion, but at first glance one could think it is legit.
-
I think it doesn't matter how long the gap is, we have 4 weeks to get where we'd like and in the end last week's meta decides what we can reach. What I'd be happy to see, is beeing able to play battlegrounds even in offseason. Just some matches that doesn't even count, you just play it for fun (aware nodes need to be…
-
I love non-standard bigger learning-curve champs. I am Quake fun (let's hope she gets to be 6* and relevant again) Nowadays Tigra with the heavy-interceptingmethod is my favourite
-
Good job ruining the ONE gamemode I was excited about and enjoyed, I guess it is more profitable to reward players that pay with units for elder's marks. I hope one day you start favoring players who play WELL instead of those who PAYS.