**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Diminishing Returns is Seemingly Broken
DoctorJ
Posts: 842 ★★★
As title state's, diminishing returns is seeming broken.
Did an experiment with a mate today based on crit rate, as we've been debating about it for awhile. I run 1/5 lesser precision and 4/5 precision. He ran 5/5 lesser precision and 5/5 precision. Logic dictates even with diminishing returns that he should be getting far more crit hits than me. So let's get to the experiment.
We both used a single champ (gwenpool) of same star level and rank (a 4* r5). We fought RoL WS.
My results over 2 fights:
Fight 1: 63/105 hits (game stuttered hard and I got ko) were crit hits.
Fight 2: 111/224 hits were crit hits.
His results:
Fight 1: 126/ 329 hits were critical
Fight 2: 133/ 362 hits were critical.
Dafuq.
How does that make any sense? It seems as though diminishing returns is a fixed percentage and not lowering each additional crit rate increase.
Have I missed something here?
If i have, just a warning there is no use in wasting more than 5 points between lesser and regular precision.
Did an experiment with a mate today based on crit rate, as we've been debating about it for awhile. I run 1/5 lesser precision and 4/5 precision. He ran 5/5 lesser precision and 5/5 precision. Logic dictates even with diminishing returns that he should be getting far more crit hits than me. So let's get to the experiment.
We both used a single champ (gwenpool) of same star level and rank (a 4* r5). We fought RoL WS.
My results over 2 fights:
Fight 1: 63/105 hits (game stuttered hard and I got ko) were crit hits.
Fight 2: 111/224 hits were crit hits.
His results:
Fight 1: 126/ 329 hits were critical
Fight 2: 133/ 362 hits were critical.
Dafuq.
How does that make any sense? It seems as though diminishing returns is a fixed percentage and not lowering each additional crit rate increase.
Have I missed something here?
If i have, just a warning there is no use in wasting more than 5 points between lesser and regular precision.
6
Comments
Comment would be most welcome.
As said, perhaps I don't understand how the system works, but to me this seems broken.
If anyone else would like to add to the pool of results, feel free. You must use a 4* r5 Gwenpool against rol ws. Tally up your crit hits and post, along with your mastery setup. Your team must only be Gwenpool, no one else.
Btw LOL at whoever couldn't help themselves and flagged my above post.
Maybe it's cause you @ a mod which isn't allowed? Not sure but that's my guess
On a side not I wouldn't put more than 1 in pierce either.
To late now lol. Idc anyways. They will close this thread for sure since it exposes their bs.
Thanks... I have no proof but even 5 seemingly has an effect on precision. A few mate's have dropped it to 4 for best results. Again I've no proof ashavent experimented with it.
But I often find the same thing happens. I'm guessing there is an interaction with DRS and CR that suppresses the rate something processes in game. I confess I haven't reread the CR/DRS tomes in the forums in a while, but I don't think I ever felt like it was ever explained in a comprehensive way.
Assuming it is all working as intended, it would ease some distrust if we had a better understanding of how those two introductions (DRS/CR) work in concert. For example, when it feels like the stun time, or zero damage % from parry or crit rate processing or whatever is far, far less than what you think it would be when you read the mastery descriptions and calculate against your champs' stats--if that is a result of DRS/CR, it would be helpful to understand why and how.
In short, black box game mechanics coupled with Kabam's poor customer relations track record and inarticulate explanations is a combo that only serves to frustrate and alienate the player base.
Dr. Zola
Your mastery setup is granting a 390 critical bonus, and his is offering a 550 critical bonus. Gwenpool's critical rating appears to be 899. So base chance to crit against a CR90 opponent is 31%, with your mastery setup it is 39% and with your friend's setup it is 42%. The difference should be relatively small, not big so you should not see "far more" crits with his set up than yours.
I can't explain why he got much fewer crits. But the numbers look odd in general. Assuming the first fight was the only one you were KOed in, your second fight has fewer crits than either of his two fights and yet you defeated Winter Soldier in a lot less hits overall. That suggests you were triggering a lot more bleed, or something else about the fights was not consistent between the two.
First off, I went ahead and moved this over to Bugs & Known as it was a question towards it being a possible "broken" mechanic.
Looking over what the OP said I can definitely understand where there are some questions behind it. @DoctorJ your friend had more crits, and more and more crits (with diminishing returns) initially will mean less in the future. If they had the same amount of overall hits as you, the amount of crits they had would likely be higher, if all else was equal. Since their fights went on longer, with more hits and crits, their crit rate steadily dropped. That's how diminishing returns works.
From what you've provided, those numbers do look correct.
So what are those numbers and why do you show them if they are wrong? Is that the initial crit chance! And it lowers after every hit in the fight? This is not how most DR systems are designed, and not what was advertised here either.
Please double check your information. If you are right, then just.. wow.
That's a terrible joke right?
So you're saying each time I crit in a fight I get less chance to crit as time goes on? Our results clearly show that isnt happening. That can't be right.
First I wanted to apologize for any confusion my previous response caused. After double checking with the team it seems I misunderstood how the mechanic works based on a prior look into it. That was completely my bad. Diminishing returns will not impact the fight once it has begun assuming that there are no buffs or debuffs impacting the stat throughout the fight (in this case crit). Rather, as any given stat approaches the top of the power curve, it gets harder and harder to make that stat better. Meanwhile, stats that are very low will grow very rapidly in usefulness when compared to naturally high base stats. This helps to bring greater balance between stats as all Champions can get a decent Critical Hit Chance but getting an exceptional Critical Hit Chance becomes harder. What that means for OP is that their friend does have a higher Critical Hit Chance rate throughout the fight, however, due to the low amount of base crit chance Lesser Precision provides, on top of the diminishing returns system the actual percentage increase would be small. Additionally, since crit is a system based off of chance by nature it is subject to variation, and so you would want a much larger sample size of fights in order to accurately determine the average Critical Hit Chance increase.
Wow, that was a lot to read, but hopefully, that helps clear up any remaining confusion. Again, apologies for the confusion - this one can be a bit trickier to lay out in text.
Ok I appreciate the clarification. That's how I understood the system to work. Thanks Vydious. Seems more data is needed on the subject
But--and this is the main point--IF adding the 4th and 5th points to those masteries only increases crit rate and crit damage by incredibly small amounts (like in the case of Pure Skill, which the team has acknowledged has little to no effect after 3/5), THEN the player base should know that with respect to Precision and Cruelty.
After all, we have a limited number of points for masteries. We have virtually no visibility into masteries, power curves and things like that. And asking players to perform experiments for all the masteries like DoctorJ has done is asking too much.
So, in a nutshell: at what point do Cruelty and Precision stop being effective? And by effective I don't mean adding .00001% to the rate.
Dr. Zola
100% agree. If they were able to distinguish this for pure skill mastery, they should be able to for precision and cruelty.
I have a feeling the reason they don't tell us is because they've broken them beyond rank 3 and 4. They don't want players screaming for refunds of cores.
Anyone have an answer?
Dr. Zola
How does this work with suicide masteries also, along with recoil??? I ask because before doubles suicides, I could crit for 7700ish with Karnak's last hit on sp2. Now with LC/DE, I am seeing roughly 82-8500. What gives?
From what I am reading, Phoenix needing 10 or 11 buffs and perfect timing to drop that sp3 is now pointless. Kamala already was rubbish, and since this system conversion, she is actually worse. Black Bolt doesn't seem to get much of a worthwhile increase that overly noticeable, even when used in the Medusa/Karnak team. Honestly, it seems that you guys have broken a whole class of champions since cosmic champions rely on a ton of buffs, generally speaking.
Someone took the time to figure out how to calculate the boost we could get from precision and cruelty buffs. They did what you should have did and provided a tool to help us understand: synergies do not do much, buffs don't do much, and it is all minimal improvement. The only thing you have done is get rid of crit resist and changed CR's horrible initial effects. We are still not getting much back in comparison to what was taken away with 12.0.
To be clear, I am not asking to go back to pre-12.0, but I am seeking some clarification on how this is fair and how it is supposed to be fun. We fight champions on nodes that still give %health and %crit rate and %crit damage. There are no synergies that could provide anywhere near the same type of boost.
If you were really so worried about min/maxing a stat, why not just put a hard cap on it like you did armor and physical resistance stats before? Why couldn't you just give everyone the same critical hit rate?
Some of the champions have been adjusted to the new format and many have not. For example: Storm got a tweak, Gambit doesn't match his old damage output whatsoever. Cyclops is still trash. RoL prize with no use, low prestige, weak specials and damage. Complete snoozefest champion. And the reason for that is their specials used to be able to give +%100 critical damage, which is not possible with DR system. So now you have broken not one, but two classes of champions. If you add in Iron Fist, that's three classes.
So in addition to clarifying this system, is there ever going to be a rapid adjustment to these older champions that you swear have value? If so, can we get a list of them- and how you will roll out a few every month, as you will with these new 5* heroes- which seems reasonable compare to a good old, "we're looking into it"??? Since the team that makes new champions is different from the ones who don't, maybe this is a reasonable expectation? Just because we use them in arena or as defenders, it does not mean they are good and that is why RDT threads keep popping up probably?
That is what I thought. The sample champs on the home screen appear to have same critical rate/crits damage as my 5/50's.
Dr. Zola