**Known AQ Bug**
We are aware that some alliances encountered a bug during this last AQ that would not allow them to start maps on certain days. We know this has impacted your rewards.
We have been looking into the cause of the problem and once we have resolved it we will explore how to make things right for the impacted alliances. We will provide any additional communication in

this thread.

hephaestus

À propos…

Pseudo
hephaestus
Inscrit
Visites
402
Dernière connexion
Statuts
Member
Points
122
Messages
145

Réponses

  • Yes. After finishing the previous fight with an SP3.
  • Note 20 ultra, same here. Restarting doesn't help. I've cleared cache, deleted data, uninstalled, restarted, and then reinstalled, that didn't help either.
  • Thank you. I'm looking in the announcements section and don't see anything about it though. Where should I have been paying attention to see that?
  • Link to exact buffs or something?
  • Not for me. I was team revived for at least half of my 30+ restarts.
  • So I forced closed and restarted more than 30 times. Persistent charges did not come back. I forced closed, cleared cache, restarted. Persistent charges did not come back. I forced closed, cleared data, restarted. Persistent charges did not come back. I forced closed, cleared cache, cleared data, uninstalled app, rebooted…
  • I've been beating odin until today easily with aa or bwcv. Today I am having this bug. All my champs are dead, I will have to revive. But I've force closed and restarted at least 20 times now and can't get the persistent charge icon. I'm stuck. If I exit out is kabam going to reimburse me the feather or something? I need…
  • I've spent at least $100 every July and November since I started playing 5 years ago. Nothing worth spending on this time.
  • This is probably the biggest let down in this game's history for me. I've been saving units for 6 months for this. I literally haven't spent a single one. Not only will I not be spending it, I'm probably not going to keep buying the 30-day unit bundles moving forward since there's apparently no reason to any more.
  • I posted a thread earlier about the pandemic energy shortage which was immediately deleted, I assume because the Sigil was about to go out. I just want to say thanks, this does help, and I didn't mean to sound ungrateful for the previous energy calendar.
    dans Free sigil? Commentaire de hephaestus avril 2020
  • Thanks. Yes, it was, I found it.
    dans Way to go Kabam! Commentaire de hephaestus août 2019
  • I take it back. All the other crystals were under "crystals." But the 5 star got stuck under "shard crystals" for some reason. I did receive it.
  • I haven't seen anything about this, which is surprising. Maybe I'm just missing it. But ever since last month (so 2 updates ago) Android freezes if you quit a fight. It happens 100% of the time. It just sticks at the loading screen indefinitely. I have to force-close and re-start to get back in.
  • I bought it, I'm level 60, but did not receive the 5* crystal. Support request submitted.
    dans Way to go Kabam! Commentaire de hephaestus août 2019
  • I bought it and received everything but the 5 star. I am level 60. Support request #05217826.
  • I would write that off as the evade taking longer than the animation, or at least the end of the animation happening before the end of the evade, so to make the animation coincide with the hit, it has to trigger the animation twice while the evade only triggers once. At least that's what I was always assuming was happening…
  • Hm. I think my display is somehow being screwed up by every one of my comments suddenly having to be approved. I don't know why that would be?
  • OK, I don't disagree with how the math works on a per-swing basis. Really, I never figured it worked any other way. But your argument seems to be, "Well, since the computer doesn't care about past or present instances, you shouldn't be surprised that 7% happens nearly every time." And that still doesn't seem like a valid…
  • OK, I don't disagree with how the math works on a per-swing basis. Really, I never figured it worked any other way. But your argument seems to be, "Well, since the computer doesn't care about past or present instances, you shouldn't be surprised that 7% happens nearly every time." And that still doesn't seem like a valid…
  • Thank you for explaining that. So what is the actual formula for what we are talking about then? How many evades should one truly expect in, say, 100 swings? Or if it's easier to do the math, reduce the sample to something manageable.
  • Explain mathematically how the sum of individual 3%'s of any sample size can be greater than 3% of that same sample size please. Because that exactly what you are saying. I'm not misunderstanding you. Perhaps you are not describing your thoughts accurately?
  • Node for Emma Frost: Double Negative - 50% chance NOT to reverse controls during specials. Sad thing is, I can TOTALLY see Kabam doing this.
  • That's not true. (1 hit * .03 chance to evade) * 100 hits = 3 hits evaded 100 hits * .03 chance to evade = 3 hits evaded If minuscule odds in real life worked like they do in MCOC, buying lottery tickets would be a sound business strategy.
  • No, really, I'm fine. I wasn't trying to go on and on, was just trying to answer the questions that people were specifically asking. I won't continue on as I do understand how it's making me look. I don't disagree with some of the logic, just that this specific incident applies to some of it. I do see that we will not…
  • Furthermore, there HAVE been nodes in the past (Wasn't there a taunt immunity node recently? I know they've also made a bunch of nodes recently to nerf Magik specifically.) that have PREVENTED something from happening in a champ's abilities or caused that thing to happen more than it otherwise would. So the existing…
  • Kabam has the power to stun anyone they want, stun immune or not. To assume that they wouldn't when they said they would requires a knowledge of creators intent that the player does not have. That's my argument.
  • Furthermore, if they did put a bleed immune champ on a bleed node I would think that champ must bleed since the only people on this planet who have the ability to make a champ bleed went to the trouble of making the node to say he/she would do so. That or I would think it would be an error.
  • There are no nodes where the dev states something will happen and then places a defender that specifically prevents it from happening because that would be a self defeating concept. Using your bleed analogy, the node would say that the champ suffers bleed but the champ they place there is bleed immune. You can't cite where…
  • If a node says X will happen, X should happen. Otherwise there is no point in the node other than playing a dirty trick on the user. If there are champs that break the promise, those champs should not be available on that node. If I sign a document agreeing to pay you $100, but it turns out I don't have $100, am I then…