possible way to tell if someone in your alliance is banned

klobberintymeklobberintyme Member Posts: 1,587 ★★★★
Just an observation, not 100% sure across the board but after jumping around alliances I've noticed that when you sort on summoner leaderboard, you can see people missing from the list who may still show in the alliance member list - also if you're friends with banned guys they drop off from your friends filter list in leaderboard as well. Anyone else see this?

Comments

  • InvisibleInvisible Member Posts: 113
    This banned thing is going way too far. Just try to communicate with your alliance members. If they don't reply you shouldn't keep them anyways regardless they are banned or not.
  • klobberintymeklobberintyme Member Posts: 1,587 ★★★★
    well if they happen to be the leader and lone officer, now AWOL for 3 days, that may put a damper on that particular alliance going forward, especially when waiting for their friend requests to come through. I've hopped through 4 alliances in 2 days and seen this.
  • KidTristanKidTristan Member Posts: 67
    They (Kabam) should auto-apply a BANNED title on their account LOL!
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★
    Dropfaith wrote: »
    They (Kabam should delete accounts instead of banning them.

    All issues here solved.
    But then they can't go to shareholders with we have xxx accounts on the server

    Not deleting is stupid
    No way! If a ban was done in error there needs to be a way to reverse that. Deleting does not leave that option and reviewing banned accounts for deletion at a later point in time is a waste of time.

    Deleting would be short sighted and unnecessary.

  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,677 Guardian
    Dropfaith wrote: »
    They (Kabam should delete accounts instead of banning them.

    All issues here solved.
    But then they can't go to shareholders with we have xxx accounts on the server

    Not deleting is stupid

    They can't go to shareholders and brag about the number of accounts they have because Kabam didn't have any public shareholders. Kabam was privately held, and Netmarble is also privately held. To the best of my knowledge, those numbers are not publicly reported.
Sign In or Register to comment.