War Matchmaking or Stupidity ??
Gtekkers
Member Posts: 18 ★
Lol
1
Comments
Here another very stupid matchmaking. Please tell me how is this even fair?? That one is clearly a tier 6 or above map, meanwhile we are tier 10 at the moment.
I feel that this gets put too much on forums and newer players simply dont understand.
Only war rating matters, that alliance your facing will eventually keep on winning until they hit a point where they will start losing to similar rosters.
For example....
If all 30 from my allaince (3200 war rating)
29mil total allaince
We faced anyone between 3000-3500 war raring alliances
Even END(MMXIV)
They are around 3100 war raring but have
44mil total alliance.
No other alliances in tier1 comes close toral alliance rating wise but does that make them too strong?
No, because we beat them during this season.
But if my current alliance decided to make a new alliance with 0 war rating, we would still be matching alliances around 0ish war rating.
Should my allaince still get match with alliance similar to our 29millon total alliance collection power?
But we will dead bottom of tier 23 with 0 war rating...and “should” we be facing allainces with with similar total alliance collection power?
Should we face tier 1,5,10,15 allainces??
Nomatter what allaince we will face at 0 war rating, we will be to strong for them..cause we have 29m total but 0 war rating...
Or should we face similar allainces with 0 war raring?
It inflated the number of alliances that the percentages are based off of because kabam doesn’t take dead or inactive alliances into consideration when calcukating tiers.
I didn’t by know why people can’t just play straight without loooking for loopholes to gain advantage.
there algorithim is if it cant find an allaince near ur war rating it will branch out to higher/lower allainces