Options

Why Kamala Khan should not be reworked.

IDogeIDoge Member Posts: 409 ★★
in General Discussion
https://youtu.be/5Ae5dO4zGSg

This video. 'Nuff said. Kabam should replace Kamala as a rework option with someone more desirable like for example Daredevil Netflix...
«13

Comments

  • BendyBendy Member Posts: 9,371 ★★★★★
    Kamala even without sp3 fury hits hard already defo not needing a buff as of yet as she can remove buffs with sp1 so defo not bad she has damage potential but say like netflix dd theres just something else worse
  • MauledMauled Member, Guardian Posts: 3,956 Guardian
    Nojokejaym said:

    what you just showed is they should rework angela instead, her special damage is pathetic

    I don't think I ever actually use Angela's specials, I just enjoy the bonuses from her full power bars and he hits like a truck.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,629 ★★★★★
    No one said they were reworking her. They may in the future, but she was on the list because it was comprised of the lowest scoring among the data they collected.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Kobster84Kobster84 Member Posts: 2,898 ★★★★★
    IDoge said:

    UmbertoDelRio said:

    I don't get your point, though.

    Yes, she's not as bad as most people seem to think. That doesn't make her an invalid choice for a rework.

    Yes, there are champs even less useful than her. That doesn't make her an invalid choice for a rework.

    This is a high demi god tier champ if you go by seatin's tier list by comparing her to angela who is currently listed as a high demi champ. She is in no need of a rework. There are many other champs that need reworks that bring nothing special to fights. Superior Iron Man and Ronan could easily replace her as an option to vote for.
    That’s with a specific synergy team that Angela can’t get
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,629 ★★★★★
    Not sure if I would call it silly. Bit inaccurate, though. They rely on the data they find themselves, looking at very specific criteria. Based on that data, they comprised a list of the Champs that scored the lowest. We may have others we think need it more, but for their side, it was in the data, and the ones we want don't necessarily score lower. Seatin's reviews didn't really factor into it.
  • Kobster84Kobster84 Member Posts: 2,898 ★★★★★
    GroundedWisdom said:

    Not sure if I would call it silly. Bit inaccurate, though. They rely on the data they find themselves, looking at very specific criteria. Based on that data, they comprised a list of the Champs that scored the lowest. We may have others we think need it more, but for their side, it was in the data, and the ones we want don't necessarily score lower. Seatin's reviews didn't really factor into it.

    Ye but when they say venompool preforms worse then Deadpool xforce it annoys me
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,629 ★★★★★
    Kobster84 said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    Not sure if I would call it silly. Bit inaccurate, though. They rely on the data they find themselves, looking at very specific criteria. Based on that data, they comprised a list of the Champs that scored the lowest. We may have others we think need it more, but for their side, it was in the data, and the ones we want don't necessarily score lower. Seatin's reviews didn't really factor into it.

    Ye but when they say venompool preforms worse then Deadpool xforce it annoys me
    I can understand that. It's just what they found. I've said it for years and had people laugh. Popular doesn't always coincide with the data. Lol.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited July 2019
    This content has been removed.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Lvernon15Lvernon15 Member Posts: 11,601 ★★★★★
    GroundedWisdom said:

    No one said they were reworking her. They may in the future, but she was on the list because it was comprised of the lowest scoring among the data they collected.

    Nope, they said they would eventually rework everyone on the list
  • Pancake_FacePancake_Face Member Posts: 1,390 ★★★★
    she hits hard everyone can give her that but in the current state of the game she doesn't have any unique abilities or cool synergies
  • KalantakKalantak Member Posts: 1,300 ★★★★
    kamala is almost same as hela ,but that doesnt mean she is good or good enough for even atleast 10% people to rank her up,and ur point is kinda invalid ,including kamala there are atleast 70-80% champions who needs some rework /synergy /buff for people to invest their rankup materials. and for this youtuber to rankup kamala is just a gimmick used by quite a few recent utubers started from that ghost guy n before that some xbones and morningstar guy, everyone wants to make same content with diffrent champs and be the sheep they r,not one is asking why falcon is such a bad champ or daredevils ,or why jane foster ,punishr 99 ,sentry , loki,vulture,rhino,moonknight,og im,two og captain americas,Yj,miles,DS,IF, ,storm,magneto,og bp, and many others has almost no use in the game ??!!! why are they adding extra 6* that completely suck like dp xforce,mags, or mk.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,629 ★★★★★
    IDoge said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    No one said they were reworking her. They may in the future, but she was on the list because it was comprised of the lowest scoring among the data they collected.

    Here is what they actually said, "We’ve shortlisted the following Champions based on their utilization and performance in content across the Contest, and player feedback through our many channels." The key word here is feedback. That's the only reason Kamala is on the list in the first place. And yes they ARE reworking her.
    No, she's on the list because she was on the lower end of the data they collected. It was already clarified in the last Thread someone disputed who should and shouldn't be on it, by Miike. If I can find the link, I'll post it.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,629 ★★★★★
    https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/909307#Comment_909307
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,629 ★★★★★
    Lvernon15 said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    No one said they were reworking her. They may in the future, but she was on the list because it was comprised of the lowest scoring among the data they collected.

    Nope, they said they would eventually rework everyone on the list
    Did they? Must have missed that.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.