Aw being based on first 6 wars

HuStLa84HuStLa84 Member Posts: 11
So we started this season with 29 and lost the first 2 wars pushing us from gold 1 to gold 2 now we’ve fought our way over the last 6 wars back to gold 1 and now your saying that your basing it of the first 6 wars....so our last 2-3 wars do not count that’s not very fair especially all the resources boosts heals etc we’ve all put in this season perhaps a blanket reward is better per tier.

Comments

  • LufasoLufaso Member Posts: 110
    Agreed, really not fair.
  • WhileSheSleepsWhileSheSleeps Member Posts: 17
    Agree, but what can we do about it, right?...😢
  • LufasoLufaso Member Posts: 110
    We need at least compensation for all the boost and potions used
  • Liss_Bliss_Liss_Bliss_ Member Posts: 1,779 ★★★★★
    No matter what, Simone is going to be upset over their way of dealing with it.
  • JadedJaded Member Posts: 5,477 ★★★★★
    Maybe bump all the rewards by one tier and give some extra to those in masters. Atm idc if they get more because we would all benefit that way.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,328 ★★★★★
    Ending the season now is the best option they have. The enlistment issue went deeper than what you experienced. At least you got to do the 6 wars, others missed out on the last war because of the issue, so is it less fair for you or them? Plus, its not Kabams fault you lost the first 2 wars of the season.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • -sixate--sixate- Member Posts: 1,532 ★★★★★
    edited November 2019
    This is complete BS, we had a couple poor efforts and dropped early, but rose back up. Now we get lesser rewards?!?! This is stupid and a poor lazy decision. I guess I shouldn't be surprised by now.
  • VesviousVesvious Member Posts: 1
    edited November 2019
    Wouldn’t it make sense to just remove the points gained from the alliances that did partake in the screwed up war?
  • LormifLormif Member Posts: 7,369 ★★★★★
    -sixate- said:

    This is complete BS, we had a couple poor efforts and dropped early, but rose back up. Now we get lesser rewards?!?! This is stupid and a poor lazy decision. I guess I shouldn't be surprised by now.

    they have said they will be adding extra compensation for people like us who lost out because of this, the problem is the 7th war was cut short because of the outage, so doing it after the 6th would be unfair to a larger portion of the playerbase.
  • This content has been removed.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,844 Guardian
    HuStLa84 said:

    So we started this season with 29 and lost the first 2 wars pushing us from gold 1 to gold 2 now we’ve fought our way over the last 6 wars back to gold 1 and now your saying that your basing it of the first 6 wars....so our last 2-3 wars do not count that’s not very fair especially all the resources boosts heals etc we’ve all put in this season perhaps a blanket reward is better per tier.

    Are you saying it would be more fair if they allowed you to climb in rankings because a lot of alliances were locked out of war?

    Since there's no way to know where you or any other alliance would have placed had all of the alliances managed to get properly placed, those rankings are all unfair rankings. You did fight the war and you did win the war, but you moved up not only because you won but also because many other alliances didn't just lose, they completely failed to score any points at all. In a normal season, even losers score a lot of points. This time, you jumped more ranks upward because many alliances were zeroed out through no fault of their own.
  • Kabam MiikeKabam Miike Moderator Posts: 8,269
    Lufaso said:

    We need at least compensation for all the boost and potions used

    Hey there, as we mentioned in the announcement, we will be doing additional Compensation outside the Season Rewards.

    Since there's already another thread on this, I'll be closing this one down. Please make future posts here: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/168601/season-ending-early#latest
This discussion has been closed.