**BANQUET EVENT PSA**
To fully participate in the upcoming Banquet's Alliance Event you will need to be in your alliance for 14 days prior to the event's start date on December 20th. That means, stay in your alliance from December 6th onwards to enjoy all there is to offer in the Banquet event.
To fully participate in the upcoming Banquet's Alliance Event you will need to be in your alliance for 14 days prior to the event's start date on December 20th. That means, stay in your alliance from December 6th onwards to enjoy all there is to offer in the Banquet event.
**Not Another Anime Reference Solo Event Returning**
This solo event has been fixed and will appear in game again on December 10th and will run through the 17th.
Reminder: This event is available to Paragon+ Summoners
This solo event has been fixed and will appear in game again on December 10th and will run through the 17th.
Reminder: This event is available to Paragon+ Summoners
INCOMING BUG FIX:
We'll fixing an issue with the Side Quests where all difficulties had the same Selector rewards.
We've fixed the Selectors in Threat Levels 4, 3, 2 and 1 to no longer contain rewards for Progression levels above the target audience.
Threat Level 4 rewards cap out at Thronebreaker
Threat Level 3 caps out at Cavalier
Threat Level 2 caps out at Uncollected
And Threat Level 1 has rewards for Proven
We'll fixing an issue with the Side Quests where all difficulties had the same Selector rewards.
We've fixed the Selectors in Threat Levels 4, 3, 2 and 1 to no longer contain rewards for Progression levels above the target audience.
Threat Level 4 rewards cap out at Thronebreaker
Threat Level 3 caps out at Cavalier
Threat Level 2 caps out at Uncollected
And Threat Level 1 has rewards for Proven
Act 7
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
2. I can always think what I like, don't need your permission
3. You don't get to put off what I said as "Kabam is mean" and ignore my points as I've acknowledged yours
But if you're really done talking about it, I'm not the only one who's thankful.
For those who care about wasp/ghost learn how to use her without wasp and you’ll be fine. I have a rank 2 wasp I use but not for the synergy; because she’s a freaking BEAST. I have taken my ghost into war without wasp and been fine. Watch videos. There are dudes who don’t even use wasp at all.
Let’s all stop complaining before the BETA not even the real content has launched. I don’t work for kabam but everyone whines so much; they’ve done a much better job the last 2-3 months, give them credit. For them to be already in the midst of book 2 is insane.
"But if you dont have an expansive roster you shouldnt play it--" no. If you arent skilled enough, you shouldnt play it. It shouldnt have anything to do with your roster size. Its a wall thats set for no good reason and thats my biggest issue with the content.
I will look at Act 7 with an open mind but I know for a fact they wont change anything in regards to 4*s being allowed in.
They admitted that Gates themselves to that extent were arbitrary and wrong, what makes 4* any different from that? Its another (much bigger) requirement. Locking content by rarity shouldnt be done, there is no good reason for it, as Ive said many times, but feel free to continue ignoring that. I will not reply to you after this is posted. Have a nice day.
Kamala khan poison immune, gains fury buffs. Doesn't that mean she is a perfect counter for 6.2.2 Sinister? I mean if skill isn't the problem why do you have to use your god tier 4*s why not use whatever 5*s you have available.
For example there's a player who has beat Grandmaster i think 20x using some of most undesirable champs in the game
Fights like the 6.2 Sinister require certain utility (poison immune and fury) so yes, a Kamala would be a good counter, but is prone to die from the fun and interactive unavoidable damage (which has nothing to do with Skill)
Using bad Champions as an example is a bad point on your part, which is why I don't see your point. Its not about "well if theyre so good why dont they use bad Champions?" Its about "if theyre so good then why arent they allowed to use their weaker good champions?" Smh.
Can’t imagine how displeased I’d be completing act 7 and getting 3*’s.
My friend has a knack for games like this ( I have no idea how he is this good at these games, honestly) and picks up things very fast. He became uncollected and beat Act 5 in about two weeks, totaling two five stars along the way. (Gwenpool and Venom) But now that he’s done that, he can’t really progress into Act 6 because not only does he not have a large enough roster, he doesn’t have the champs to work around certain fights like the EMP mod Ultron. His progression is being limited by his roster, not his skill, and that’s a problem.
However, I see your points, and I do think since this is a new book in the contest, four stars not being allowed in higher tier content makes sense. It’s like bringing four stars into chapter 1 of variant 4, not only would it not make sense, they wouldn’t be as useful. The meta has shifted, and will continue to shift, and the content should shift with that meta.
Edit: they should be allowed to use 4* in that content, even if they arent very effective anymore. You didnt see people trying to beat Act 5 with 3* Champs very often, and even though it wasnt a super good idea, some people still completed Quests in Act 5 with 3* Champions. They didnt need to ban them from that content, people just learned its best not to bring them.
I think what Kabam was trying to do is push the bigger roster like @GroundedWisdom said. Because that makes Kabam more money, and that’s what this boils down to. Kabam making money off of people trying to build a roster so that they can complete content.