**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Ability Accuracy Synergies
Savage
Posts: 621 ★★★
So I've been a bit confused for a while now regarding synergies like these. What I don't understand is if these synergies add flat percentages of ability accuracy to the champions or multiply their percentage by said amount. I want to know if these synergies are actually useful or just minor bonuses.
0
Comments
Black Widow has a synergy with Ghulk that supposedly gives her a +100% Evade chance, which clearly increases it from 3% to 6%.
On the other hand, Cable has one with Warlock that grants +10% AA to his regeneration. This would take it from 15% to either 16.5% or 25%. Being curious, I took Cable against WS in ROL, and my initial testing suggested this was a flat increase (or I just had really good RNG in that game).
I suspect that if it's a large increase (+20% or more) it's usually a percentage increase, and when it's a small increase (+15% less) it's a flat increase. But that's just a poorly educated guess; and I doubt it's entirely clear-cut.
Try experimenting in ROL with the Cable/Warlock example, and see what numbers you get. A bit of experimenting tells me that it's a flat increase, even if it doesn't say so in the description.
An example is when I took Quake again Domino. Since Quake's syn is 100% and Domino reduces AA by 15%, I wasn't able to Quake and Bake her.(100-15=85%)
But adding BW for the syn makes her AA 100%. (100+15-15=100%).
It helps.
https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/190253/quake-gets-critical-failure-against-domino-with-hawkeye-synergy
No matter whether you go by the “Addition/Subtraction” or by the “Multiplication” method, the (reduces Quake's 100% AA by 15%) would come out to 85% no matter which method is correct.
And then even with worst case of mathematical “ordering”, applying BW's extra 15% back in might at worst become 97.75% (or if different ordering, would be 100% either way too). Which the 97.75 is basically indistinguishable from 100% unless you take a large enough sample size of trials.