No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment.
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs Nova flame works on debuff-immune, because it is a passive effect. Passive stuns work on debuff-immune for the exact same reason. And they wouldn't work on nova-flame-immune for the exact same reason any stun doesn't work on stun-immune.All nullify effects can only interact with buffs. That's absolutely nothing specials.Besides some wonky ability descriptions all of this is extremely easy to understand and straight forward.
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs You’re heavily misinformed please don’t commment in stuff you don’t know you just spread misinformation and the ignorance that goes with phrases like “working as intended, benefits the players”Nova flames are not incinerates the only relation to incinerates are that HT treats them as IncineratesCap IW and thing specifically state they NULLIFY unstoppable buffsThey can not reduce the AA of unstoppable effects like slow So learn what deuce/buffs vs passive effects are and read abilities You can’t stun a stun immune champ But can inflict passive effects on debuff immune champs
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs Nova flame works on debuff-immune, because it is a passive effect. Passive stuns work on debuff-immune for the exact same reason. And they wouldn't work on nova-flame-immune for the exact same reason any stun doesn't work on stun-immune.All nullify effects can only interact with buffs. That's absolutely nothing specials.Besides some wonky ability descriptions all of this is extremely easy to understand and straight forward. You're running yourself through mental gymnasticsHere are facts(1)Nova flame is a debuff.its a passive debuff. It works on debuff immune matchups.Doom and wasps heavys cause passive stuns. They don't work on stun immuneWhat reason can you give apart from inconsistency(2)Passive effects have always bypassed things like immunities and ability to shrug off(3)Cap iw shrugs off falter in 6.3 because it's active.He doesn't shrug off falter in act 7 because it's passive.(4)I rather enjoy Human torch so I'll leave it at that before they give him the Morningstar treatment First of all, there is no such thing as a "passive debuff" in this game. A debuff is nessecarily an active effect. Nova flames are a unique passive damage over time effect.Second of all, those passive effects that did bypass their respective immunity have so far been fixed, since those were unintended interactions. Again, refer to the passive bleed against bleed immune conundrum.Third of all, duh...?Fourth of all, what...?
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs Nova flame works on debuff-immune, because it is a passive effect. Passive stuns work on debuff-immune for the exact same reason. And they wouldn't work on nova-flame-immune for the exact same reason any stun doesn't work on stun-immune.All nullify effects can only interact with buffs. That's absolutely nothing specials.Besides some wonky ability descriptions all of this is extremely easy to understand and straight forward. You're running yourself through mental gymnasticsHere are facts(1)Nova flame is a debuff.its a passive debuff. It works on debuff immune matchups.Doom and wasps heavys cause passive stuns. They don't work on stun immuneWhat reason can you give apart from inconsistency(2)Passive effects have always bypassed things like immunities and ability to shrug off(3)Cap iw shrugs off falter in 6.3 because it's active.He doesn't shrug off falter in act 7 because it's passive.(4)I rather enjoy Human torch so I'll leave it at that before they give him the Morningstar treatment
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs You’re heavily misinformed please don’t commment in stuff you don’t know you just spread misinformation and the ignorance that goes with phrases like “working as intended, benefits the players”Nova flames are not incinerates the only relation to incinerates are that HT treats them as IncineratesCap IW and thing specifically state they NULLIFY unstoppable buffsThey can not reduce the AA of unstoppable effects like slow So learn what deuce/buffs vs passive effects are and read abilities You can’t stun a stun immune champ But can inflict passive effects on debuff immune champs Where did I state anything about incinerate...I said it's a debuff and bypasses debuff immunity I'm well aware it doesn't count as an incinerate The game doesn't call the a debuff. No one who knows how this game works calls them a debuff.Talk about mental gymnastics.
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs You’re heavily misinformed please don’t commment in stuff you don’t know you just spread misinformation and the ignorance that goes with phrases like “working as intended, benefits the players”Nova flames are not incinerates the only relation to incinerates are that HT treats them as IncineratesCap IW and thing specifically state they NULLIFY unstoppable buffsThey can not reduce the AA of unstoppable effects like slow So learn what deuce/buffs vs passive effects are and read abilities You can’t stun a stun immune champ But can inflict passive effects on debuff immune champs Where did I state anything about incinerate...I said it's a debuff and bypasses debuff immunity I'm well aware it doesn't count as an incinerate
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs You’re heavily misinformed please don’t commment in stuff you don’t know you just spread misinformation and the ignorance that goes with phrases like “working as intended, benefits the players”Nova flames are not incinerates the only relation to incinerates are that HT treats them as IncineratesCap IW and thing specifically state they NULLIFY unstoppable buffsThey can not reduce the AA of unstoppable effects like slow So learn what deuce/buffs vs passive effects are and read abilities You can’t stun a stun immune champ But can inflict passive effects on debuff immune champs Where did I state anything about incinerate...I said it's a debuff and bypasses debuff immunity I'm well aware it doesn't count as an incinerate I meant that the only relationship to it being a debuff was it being counted as an incinerate towards HT abilities could have worded it better ig but you really don’t know what you’re talking about The game is consistent about this You can check this by pausing the fight and reading the mini description The only inconsistency is rulk and some degens
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs Nova flame works on debuff-immune, because it is a passive effect. Passive stuns work on debuff-immune for the exact same reason. And they wouldn't work on nova-flame-immune for the exact same reason any stun doesn't work on stun-immune.All nullify effects can only interact with buffs. That's absolutely nothing specials.Besides some wonky ability descriptions all of this is extremely easy to understand and straight forward. You're running yourself through mental gymnasticsHere are facts(1)Nova flame is a debuff.its a passive debuff. It works on debuff immune matchups.Doom and wasps heavys cause passive stuns. They don't work on stun immuneWhat reason can you give apart from inconsistency(2)Passive effects have always bypassed things like immunities and ability to shrug off(3)Cap iw shrugs off falter in 6.3 because it's active.He doesn't shrug off falter in act 7 because it's passive.(4)I rather enjoy Human torch so I'll leave it at that before they give him the Morningstar treatment First of all, there is no such thing as a "passive debuff" in this game. A debuff is nessecarily an active effect. Nova flames are a unique passive damage over time effect.Second of all, those passive effects that did bypass their respective immunity have so far been fixed, since those were unintended interactions. Again, refer to the passive bleed against bleed immune conundrum.Third of all, duh...?Fourth of all, what...? The fourth was referring to Claire, Morningstar and champion debacleI see the logic in what you're saying. I just don't see the point inconsistency How do those have anything do to with any of this here?Let me explain, though:Other than some lifesteal mechanics like ghost rider's, who regens a specified amount of damage on every hit, claire and morningstar regen a specified percentage of the damage done to their opponent. Do you understand the difference? The first can heal from an indestructible opponent, because he only needs to hit them. The latter two can not, because [X]% of 0 damage equals zero regen.As to the second part, there are no inconsistencies in this thread whatsoever. What are you even talking about?
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs Nova flame works on debuff-immune, because it is a passive effect. Passive stuns work on debuff-immune for the exact same reason. And they wouldn't work on nova-flame-immune for the exact same reason any stun doesn't work on stun-immune.All nullify effects can only interact with buffs. That's absolutely nothing specials.Besides some wonky ability descriptions all of this is extremely easy to understand and straight forward. You're running yourself through mental gymnasticsHere are facts(1)Nova flame is a debuff.its a passive debuff. It works on debuff immune matchups.Doom and wasps heavys cause passive stuns. They don't work on stun immuneWhat reason can you give apart from inconsistency(2)Passive effects have always bypassed things like immunities and ability to shrug off(3)Cap iw shrugs off falter in 6.3 because it's active.He doesn't shrug off falter in act 7 because it's passive.(4)I rather enjoy Human torch so I'll leave it at that before they give him the Morningstar treatment First of all, there is no such thing as a "passive debuff" in this game. A debuff is nessecarily an active effect. Nova flames are a unique passive damage over time effect.Second of all, those passive effects that did bypass their respective immunity have so far been fixed, since those were unintended interactions. Again, refer to the passive bleed against bleed immune conundrum.Third of all, duh...?Fourth of all, what...? The fourth was referring to Claire, Morningstar and champion debacleI see the logic in what you're saying. I just don't see the point inconsistency
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs Nova flame works on debuff-immune, because it is a passive effect. Passive stuns work on debuff-immune for the exact same reason. And they wouldn't work on nova-flame-immune for the exact same reason any stun doesn't work on stun-immune.All nullify effects can only interact with buffs. That's absolutely nothing specials.Besides some wonky ability descriptions all of this is extremely easy to understand and straight forward. You're running yourself through mental gymnasticsHere are facts(1)Nova flame is a debuff.its a passive debuff. It works on debuff immune matchups.Doom and wasps heavys cause passive stuns. They don't work on stun immuneWhat reason can you give apart from inconsistency(2)Passive effects have always bypassed things like immunities and ability to shrug off(3)Cap iw shrugs off falter in 6.3 because it's active.He doesn't shrug off falter in act 7 because it's passive.(4)I rather enjoy Human torch so I'll leave it at that before they give him the Morningstar treatment First of all, there is no such thing as a "passive debuff" in this game. A debuff is nessecarily an active effect. Nova flames are a unique passive damage over time effect.Second of all, those passive effects that did bypass their respective immunity have so far been fixed, since those were unintended interactions. Again, refer to the passive bleed against bleed immune conundrum.Third of all, duh...?Fourth of all, what...? The fourth was referring to Claire, Morningstar and champion debacleI see the logic in what you're saying. I just don't see the point inconsistency How do those have anything do to with any of this here?Let me explain, though:Other than some lifesteal mechanics like ghost rider's, who regens a specified amount of damage on every hit, claire and morningstar regen a specified percentage of the damage done to their opponent. Do you understand the difference? The first can heal from an indestructible opponent, because he only needs to hit them. The latter two can not, because [X]% of 0 damage equals zero regen.As to the second part, there are no inconsistencies in this thread whatsoever. What are you even talking about? I was referring to the situation. The revisit of Morningstar because of claire . Not the interactionAnd inconsistency in the game not the thread Well, since morningstar and claire have in essence the exact same lifesteal mechanic it makes sense to revisit and fix her.Same thing happened with all the passive stuns in this game after wasp got fixed.And yes, there certainly are inconsistencies.As I said, some in-game descriptions are wonky. For example, normally the game describes "buffs" (active beneficial effects) as either "buffs", "active effects" or something along those lines. Dormammu's description however states that his sp1 removes "positive status effects".Also as mentioned before there's something about hulk rag's "face me" mechanic. However, this is more convoluted than it is inconsistent.In short, face me activates where it is intended to activate.Longer answer: besides active and passive effects there are actually effects in this game that are neither. The only inconsistency about this is that kabam apparently can't be bothered to make those visually distinguishable. They normally look exactly like any other passive effect.However, those effects do not interact with any ability in this game. When they are dot effects they do not activate "face me" and nick fury can not shrug them off when entering his second phase (he can normally shrug off passive effects).Generally however all this stuff is pretty consistent.
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs Nova flame works on debuff-immune, because it is a passive effect. Passive stuns work on debuff-immune for the exact same reason. And they wouldn't work on nova-flame-immune for the exact same reason any stun doesn't work on stun-immune.All nullify effects can only interact with buffs. That's absolutely nothing specials.Besides some wonky ability descriptions all of this is extremely easy to understand and straight forward. You're running yourself through mental gymnasticsHere are facts(1)Nova flame is a debuff.its a passive debuff. It works on debuff immune matchups.Doom and wasps heavys cause passive stuns. They don't work on stun immuneWhat reason can you give apart from inconsistency(2)Passive effects have always bypassed things like immunities and ability to shrug off(3)Cap iw shrugs off falter in 6.3 because it's active.He doesn't shrug off falter in act 7 because it's passive.(4)I rather enjoy Human torch so I'll leave it at that before they give him the Morningstar treatment First of all, there is no such thing as a "passive debuff" in this game. A debuff is nessecarily an active effect. Nova flames are a unique passive damage over time effect.Second of all, those passive effects that did bypass their respective immunity have so far been fixed, since those were unintended interactions. Again, refer to the passive bleed against bleed immune conundrum.Third of all, duh...?Fourth of all, what...? The fourth was referring to Claire, Morningstar and champion debacleI see the logic in what you're saying. I just don't see the point inconsistency How do those have anything do to with any of this here?Let me explain, though:Other than some lifesteal mechanics like ghost rider's, who regens a specified amount of damage on every hit, claire and morningstar regen a specified percentage of the damage done to their opponent. Do you understand the difference? The first can heal from an indestructible opponent, because he only needs to hit them. The latter two can not, because [X]% of 0 damage equals zero regen.As to the second part, there are no inconsistencies in this thread whatsoever. What are you even talking about? I was referring to the situation. The revisit of Morningstar because of claire . Not the interactionAnd inconsistency in the game not the thread
I've heard that Wasps did, but Dooms did not.
No.It should but that's too beneficial for the player by kabams logic There's literally no logic in your comment. Except passive dot like nova flame works on debuff immuneCap iw and thing nullify unstoppable unless it's passiveThey've always been fast and loose when it comes to passive debuffs you are comparing too diffrent things, Passive DOT works on debuff immune because they are not a debuff, they are a massive effect. Passive stuns dont work on Stun immune because they are still a stun effect, passive or non passive if the champ is stun immune then you shouldnt be able to stun them.
This thread made me lose brain cells