The new war matchmaking system is really worst than ever

We are fighting a alliance that members has around 10k prestige rate last season we didn't lose a single war but this new matchmaking war system is really unfair able you can see the screenshot and tell is this any match?

Comments

Dshu

With the war rating determining the matches wouldn't the rewards even out without separate brackets based on prestige? If you finish at the top of say silver 1 then that would be your top rewards. If a 70 mil alliance puts no effort in and finishes in silver that seems fair for their rewards. If a 10 mil alliance has the skills to hit gold that would be their top rewards. Seems like they already worked out the brackets without using prestige to make the rich get richer.

Petusko2811

Guys if there will be 2 leaderboards the small one will have prizes as is current in smaller bracket si it will be absolutely same. What is difference between end in one on gold1 rewards or win the small one for gold1 rewards ? Point is only very dedicated smaller alliances shoul win high prizes. It must be deserved and not that by being best in small you wins p2-p1 rewards. Its exactly same BS as if player at begining will be playing act3 content for act6 rewards with argument that for him its same difficulty as for me act6

Prime_Saviour02

How is it? This is with the new match making system? We will drop to plat 4 and stay there (where we was placed last season).

We've face 2 30 mill alliance (won those two) and have had 40+ mill for our losses. Only thing which is keeping our alliance faith is that we can get plat 4. However there are many who won't be so lucky.

unknown

This content has been removed.

Greekhit

It’s not a matter of lack, it’s a matter of strength. Those who you refer that won’t be so lucky to stay at platinum 4, probably they didn’t deserved it from first place. Another stronger ally will take that spot (that was her natural) back.

GroundedWisdom

A new Rewards structure would have prevented this.

Mr_Platypus

Ok I take it back, if you’re consistently beating plat 4 competition then you absolutely deserve plat 4. What I should say is the overwhelming majority of 20mil alliance shouldn’t have a chance at platinum.

xNig

And you’ve ignored every argument against it.

Heattblastt

Why 5 seasons?? Wasn't the last system present from the start of season1??

Mr_Platypus

And that would’ve punished alliances like the one Prime_Saviour is in that can genuinely compete with and win against alliances with stronger rosters and higher prestige.
A better way to start this season, sure, but a new reward structure, no.

unknown

This content has been removed.

unknown

This content has been removed.

GroundedWisdom

I said a new Rewards structure. I didn't say it had to be the one I designed. People keep shifting their argument. It's the Rewards, but if someone suggests the Rewards being changed then no, that's not fair either, then....
This is Defender Kills all over again. All people have to do to win is lay a Defense against a much weaker Ally. Only, they were removed for a reason. They didn't want people to be discouraged from trying. That's exactly what's coming out of these overpowered Matches. People are being discouraged from even trying or playing. What's more is they come here to bring it up, and they're being told they can't hang, and they should fall because they don't deserve their Rewards. It's a mess.

unknown

This content has been removed.

unknown

This content has been removed.

Lormif

In the short term people will be discouraged because the previous system allowed it to become out of whack, the longer this system goes the more fairly matched people will get.

GroundedWisdom

People keep saying that, but the effects are here right now. Not later on. That's what we're talking about. They're facing the effects right now.

Lormif

from the topic it seems we are talking about the "system", not the pain to transition to it. Stop thinking about the short term and realize that this better for the long term.

CaptainGame

So you’d rather discourage the teams that put more money and time into the game to develop their rosters by ranking them under those who didn’t as much yet.

CaptainGame

We have a rewards structure. It’s stone, bronze, silver, gold, platinum, and masters. You fall into whichever bracket you are good enough to make it to.

GroundedWisdom

Let's try that at a store. We know the price is unfair right now and you're getting ripped off, but you'll be so much happier when you see how cheap they are in the future.

GroundedWisdom

What part of a new Rewards structure implies that?

Lormif

terrible analogy, there is no cost to war. In addition the only pain you should see if the feeling of anger at losses, you will probably be close to your true ranking by the end of the war.

unknown

This content has been removed.

GroundedWisdom

There is a cost. Aside from the literal cost people will be spending in the Matches, there is a cost of their experience in the Season, their game experience, and a cost of Players if they decide to give up.

unknown

This content has been removed.

unknown

This content has been removed.

CaptainGame

The fact that you say that we need one now. But we already have a rewards structure that once the dust settles, will be for each ranking tier. Nobody ever said anything about it before until smaller alliances started losing to stronger alliances that they were ranked higher than.

CaptainGame

This is a strawman argument. But if we were to compare, then the store has been charging wealthier customers more than poor customers for 10 seasons. Now they corrected it, and the poor are crying for bigger discounts now.

GroundedWisdom

The argument isn't for Rewards. It's for Matches that aren't already decided before they're fought because they're vastly overpowered.