War Season Rewards poll

124»

Comments

  • LormifLormif Member Posts: 7,369 ★★★★★
    Yes
    MetalJake said:

    Lormif said:

    MetalJake said:

    Ya_Boi_28 said:

    Bidzy7 said:

    Ya_Boi_28 said:

    Bidzy7 said:

    Don't like the rewards ? Don't play AW

    Simples!!!!

    the difference in difficulty at the top is crazy. At tier 5 and above is when you get all sorts of BS fights with the interaction of the global along with the nodes on the map that you really need to have a wide roster and be willing to use lots of items to boost and heal up between each fight.

    If you guys are happy to do that then join an alliance capable of pushing.

    AW tier 6 and below is super chilled and can be done with very limited items and skill just need to strategize on the best champions to bring to clear path.

    If you are spending 4-5k Glory and units at silver 1 then you are clearly not good enough to be getting 6* shards. at tier 6 ( Gold 1 level) i spend 0 items while clearing on average 8-10 fights a map with mini bosses and boss included. At Tier 5 and above i have to use some items because you face harder champions, nodes and global.

    The harsh reality is if you want better rewards you need to be capable of clearing harder AW maps then the ones you currently are clearing.

    No, no and no. What are you talking about?
    Lol to summarize for you, basically "Git Gud!"

    your whole argument in this thread is based on the fact you are spending Glory and units to do AW and you find that its not worth the effort. Well stop spending those resources. You can use the glory instead on rank up materials.

    If you want 6* shards then join an alliance that can push gold 2 or above.

    AW is competitive game mode where resources you gain are based on how you do compared to others. This isn't if you do x amount of wars you get x rewards. That's what the monthly content is for.
    I'm not asking for 6-Star shards. I'm also aware that I can move to a G2 ally. I'm just asking for lower toer rewards not to be steaming hot garbage.
    That’s exactly what I meant by saying they didn’t scale the rewards to the lower tiers when they buffed the whales.... I don’t expect 4-5 6 stars at the end of the season but if you drop that by 50% per tier working ya way down, silver should get at least 1000 6 star shards or a fully formed 5 star.. silver 1 today I got what... 3500 5 star shards for a season of wars where my alliance finished 7-2 in the 9 wars
    silver 1 and you expect 6* shards and a fully formed 5*? yea, not for a long time. We have been talking about gold, now you throwing out silver, that is not even considered anywhere near competitive, you can fall and make silver.
    We finished the season 7-2. We won 7 of our 9 wars and still got less that 1/3 of a 5 star... honestly DONT care if there’s 6 star shards associated with it I just want to feel like the month long commitment a season takes FEELS worth the effort. And it doesn’t esp of you compare what the top 6? Tiers get and try scaling down to where you are and there’s ABSOLUTELY no comparison
    yea the top 6 tiers spend vastly more resources, time and require a lot more skill to accomplish. It is like comparing major league baseball to Tball.
  • zuffyzuffy Member Posts: 2,240 ★★★★★
    Yes
    I run a leisure 1BG in tier 3 war. No requirement to use items. There are wars where we have 70-80 deaths because we just use l1/2 team revives only. Also, it’s very satisfying to see your defense get kills. LOL. We made gold 3 in season 18 and gold 2 in season 19. For the effort, it’s decent rewards.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,619 Guardian
    MetalJake said:

    DNA3000 said:

    MetalJake said:

    But just the notion of it scared (for lack of better term) kabam into boosting the rewards at the top while not scaling them down to the lower tiers

    It amuses me to think there's anyone anywhere that thinks the "boycott" did anything. There aren't enough quote marks in existence to wrap that word in the number it deserves.
    I’m not saying it in itself did anything to the game itself. I’m saying the CONVERSATION started by Seatins “quitting my alliance” video made kabam start thinning ab how to keep y’all happy before something ACTUALLY did take place.
    I'm not sure to what degree you're generally involved with, or a spectator to, these events, but talking about the "boycott" when you actually mean the burnout conversation that centered on (but wasn't actually started by) Seatin's video is weird because the vast overwhelming majority of players active in the conversation disavowed the so-called boycott as representing their concerns, including Seatin.

    Moreover, the adjustments to season 19 were actually formulated before those discussions even took place. We know this because many of the changes were actively hated by players who thought they were in direct contradiction to the discussions happening at the time, and Kabam explicitly stated that those changes were already in the pipeline before the roadmaps were created as a result of those conversations.

    The fact that you connect the boycott to the burnout thread tells me you don't really understand what was happening at the time. And the fact that you connect the S19 changes to those discussions says you were not following the discussions surrounding S19.
  • MetalJakeMetalJake Member Posts: 343 ★★
    DNA3000 said:

    MetalJake said:

    DNA3000 said:

    MetalJake said:

    But just the notion of it scared (for lack of better term) kabam into boosting the rewards at the top while not scaling them down to the lower tiers

    It amuses me to think there's anyone anywhere that thinks the "boycott" did anything. There aren't enough quote marks in existence to wrap that word in the number it deserves.
    I’m not saying it in itself did anything to the game itself. I’m saying the CONVERSATION started by Seatins “quitting my alliance” video made kabam start thinning ab how to keep y’all happy before something ACTUALLY did take place.
    I'm not sure to what degree you're generally involved with, or a spectator to, these events, but talking about the "boycott" when you actually mean the burnout conversation that centered on (but wasn't actually started by) Seatin's video is weird because the vast overwhelming majority of players active in the conversation disavowed the so-called boycott as representing their concerns, including Seatin.

    Moreover, the adjustments to season 19 were actually formulated before those discussions even took place. We know this because many of the changes were actively hated by players who thought they were in direct contradiction to the discussions happening at the time, and Kabam explicitly stated that those changes were already in the pipeline before the roadmaps were created as a result of those conversations.

    The fact that you connect the boycott to the burnout thread tells me you don't really understand what was happening at the time. And the fact that you connect the S19 changes to those discussions says you were not following the discussions surrounding S19.
    It was a cascading effect not just one or the others... the top alliance were in conversations discussing a boycot, just bc they couldn’t agree or whatever happened didn’t show they were WILLING to do it if the top of the game could’ve found common ground. As for the burnout, it all took place within a month or 2 so of course they would be perceived as linked bc the close proximity to each other... as for Kabam saying they already had that buff in place before all that took place is based on the reality of wether you UNQUESTIONABLY believe every word out of thier mouth or not. Just bc someone said that to save face doesn’t make it factual unless they could show non-manipulated proof and it’s kind of irrelevant still bc they left the other 75% of the player base underwhelmed and the optics of how it all went down from seatins burnout video to the release of the roadmap looks like they were only worried ab appeasing their big spenders
  • _Reef_Reef Member Posts: 267
    Yes if they buff rewards
    As leader this sh was mad stressfulful trying to make people play, taking note of who placed and rearranging 3 grps of champs every other day and on top of AQ, i cant control other members, we fell from gold 3 to silver 1, all that effort for what. I mean if i play a couple wars a month it'll be worth it but from my end nah. Itll be easier to contribute to a plat alliance as a member
  • Papicante1Papicante1 Member Posts: 35
    No
    I didn’t even get any :/
Sign In or Register to comment.