Which difficulty is higher Cavalier or Uncollected??
Why is it that Cavalier Exploration Rewards has 15600 T2A and Uncollected has 18000 T2A??? this just doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Kabam said Cavalier rewards were carefully thought out to help us R5 our 5 star. Then why the lower difficulty has more T2A for the exploration rewards part of it?
Cavalier: 10.800 for completion, 37.200 for exploration
Uncollected: 6.000 for completion, 30.000 for exploration
You can't compare permanent content like Variant 5 with the Cavalier Difficulty If Event Quest has more rewards than permanent content, then players won't have any incentive to complete it
And in Cavalier EQ there is 2 x 10% T5CC Crystal
And why there are none 5* shards and 6* shards listed under the 'Other Resources' category in Cavalier EQ? Because you have mention them for Variant 5'
And who is gonna spend all his glory in T2A and T5B? Usually the top 90 alliances in AQ compete in AW as well This means that they have to buy potions with glory
And you haven't told us how many points per week an alliances that runs 7x5 gets
This is one of the worst comparisons I have ever seen
(Sorry for the lots of 'And' but there are so many stupid things in this board)
Only comparing resources to rank up champs. And lets see if you don’t think the same about t5cc in 3 months. And the other 10% needs extra round with 4* champs. When UC has been released I’ve done it 100% all months. I Don’t see myself doing cavalier eq all months with this rewards
If you’re finding cav difficulty too hard to do every month, there’s no way you’re in a top 90 aq alliance so what’s the point of comparing? Alone with the face you cut the t5c in half from the actual rewards and ignored shards
In my post I’m only talking about the rewards. And as explained, only resources. I’m not complaining about 5&6* shards. Difficulty is ok but rewards are underwhelming.
You can't compare permanent content like Variant 5 with the Cavalier Difficulty If Event Quest has more rewards than permanent content, then players won't have any incentive to complete it
And in Cavalier EQ there is 2 x 10% T5CC Crystal
And why there are none 5* shards and 6* shards listed under the 'Other Resources' category in Cavalier EQ? Because you have mention them for Variant 5'
And who is gonna spend all his glory in T2A and T5B? Usually the top 90 alliances in AQ compete in AW as well This means that they have to buy potions with glory
And you haven't told us how many points per week an alliances that runs 7x5 gets
This is one of the worst comparisons I have ever seen
(Sorry for the lots of 'And' but there are so many stupid things in this board)
Only comparing resources to rank up champs. And lets see if you don’t think the same about t5cc in 3 months. And the other 10% needs extra round with 4* champs. When UC has been released I’ve done it 100% all months. I Don’t see myself doing cavalier eq all months with this rewards
If you’re finding cav difficulty too hard to do every month, there’s no way you’re in a top 90 aq alliance so what’s the point of comparing? Alone with the face you cut the t5c in half from the actual rewards and ignored shards
In my post I’m only talking about the rewards. And as explained, only resources. I’m not complaining about 5&6* shards. Difficulty is ok but rewards are underwhelming.
But why you mention 5* champs in the Variant? You haven't explained that
You compare selective parts of the rewards
And again this is one of the WORST comparisons that I have ever seen
You can't compare permanent content like Variant 5 with the Cavalier Difficulty If Event Quest has more rewards than permanent content, then players won't have any incentive to complete it
And in Cavalier EQ there is 2 x 10% T5CC Crystal
And why there are none 5* shards and 6* shards listed under the 'Other Resources' category in Cavalier EQ? Because you have mention them for Variant 5'
And who is gonna spend all his glory in T2A and T5B? Usually the top 90 alliances in AQ compete in AW as well This means that they have to buy potions with glory
And you haven't told us how many points per week an alliances that runs 7x5 gets
This is one of the worst comparisons I have ever seen
(Sorry for the lots of 'And' but there are so many stupid things in this board)
Only comparing resources to rank up champs. And lets see if you don’t think the same about t5cc in 3 months. And the other 10% needs extra round with 4* champs. When UC has been released I’ve done it 100% all months. I Don’t see myself doing cavalier eq all months with this rewards
If you’re finding cav difficulty too hard to do every month, there’s no way you’re in a top 90 aq alliance so what’s the point of comparing? Alone with the face you cut the t5c in half from the actual rewards and ignored shards
In my post I’m only talking about the rewards. And as explained, only resources. I’m not complaining about 5&6* shards. Difficulty is ok but rewards are underwhelming.
But why you mention 5* champs in the Variant? You haven't explained that
You compare selective parts of the rewards
And again this is one of the WORST comparisons that I have ever seen
I didn’t do it. In variant only included the rank up materials. Not the 5 or 6* shards. Seriously @whaaaat did you understand the table? Clearly indicated resources at the beginning.
Comments
Uncollected: 6.000 for completion, 30.000 for exploration
Do some research first
https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/219562/event-quest-rewards-update-and-cavalier-difficulty
You haven't explained that
You compare selective parts of the rewards
And again this is one of the WORST comparisons that I have ever seen