Rank Down Tickets? V2

SiliyoSiliyo Member Posts: 1,486 ★★★★★
With the current state of alliance wars, some people would need to rank up certain characters for diversity sake and since Defender Diversity does affect alliance war as a whole, will we see rank down tickets?
«1

Comments

  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,620 ★★★★★
    You will still need the Champs you already Ranked for Diversity.
  • YellsomeYellsome Member Posts: 485
    NO GOD PLEASE NO
  • BinawayawhileBinawayawhile Member Posts: 287
    If only I had chars to rank down
  • ZoddymamZoddymam Member, Content Creators Posts: 362 Content Creator
    edited September 2017
    So when everyone ranks down their heros and everyone starts to rank up other heros you going to ask for rank tickets V3 because many people deranked and ranked up similar heros. Give it a rest kabam not giving tickets for this aw change
  • Run477Run477 Member Posts: 1,391 ★★★
    somebody should suggest that we get just a few rankup tickets, not a lot. Maybe 2 for 5*s and 5 for 4*s or something. Also, maybe someone should post that kabam could sell them. Or, maybe someone should post that we deserve them so that kabam shows us they care.

    I don't think I have seen any posts like that in the last month.
  • UC439UC439 Member Posts: 261
    Zoddymam wrote: »
    So when everyone ranks down their heros and everyone starts to rank up other heros you going to ask for rank tickets V3 because many people deranked and ranked up similar heros. Give it a rest kabam not giving tickets for this aw change

    If u communicate within ur alliance, it is very unlikely that everyone will upgrade the same champions. But atm, most of the ally members have the same top defenders ranked up, & are being greatly punished for placing those champions, on which they spent their resources on. So rank down tickets are absolute necessary in current situation.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,105 ★★★★★
    UC439 wrote: »
    Zoddymam wrote: »
    So when everyone ranks down their heros and everyone starts to rank up other heros you going to ask for rank tickets V3 because many people deranked and ranked up similar heros. Give it a rest kabam not giving tickets for this aw change

    If u communicate within ur alliance, it is very unlikely that everyone will upgrade the same champions. But atm, most of the ally members have the same top defenders ranked up, & are being greatly punished for placing those champions, on which they spent their resources on. So rank down tickets are absolutely NOT necessary in current situation.

    Corrected your paragraph
  • AfridAfrid Member Posts: 529 ★★
    I think it would be better if we get more rank up materials than RDT's
  • CunnusCunnus Member Posts: 18
    Kabam have said that they would give rank down tickets for certain champions if they're nerfed, for example, if they cut Hyperion's power gain, they'd bring out a Hyperion rank down ticket.
    I agree it would be better over all if we got rank up materials to help us build our defence, but at the least, some tickets would be good, I've got a lot of champs, and so do members of my alliance, and most alliances, that they've brought up specifically for defence, I brought my Nightcrawler to 5/50 to use as a defence champ. Before the update our alliance had 15 Nightcrawlers in defence, but because of the 'diversity' points, a lot of those NC's are going to go to waste, and while he's an okay attacker, and he has good prestige, I'd much rather have Archangel or someone at 5/50 over NC.
    There's too many champs that have been brought up for defence, to issue character specific RDTs, a couple of class RDTs would be appreciated by the MCOC community I'm sure. Means we'll all be able to bring down a couple of the Spider-Men, Black Panthers, Unstoppable Colossus's (Collossi?) and other champs that might not be used in an attacking team.
  • R4GER4GE Member Posts: 1,530 ★★★★
    Afrid wrote: »
    I think it would be better if we get more rank up materials than RDT's

    You may be right. But I don't see them making t2a readily available to make up for what many have lost.
  • AfridAfrid Member Posts: 529 ★★
    R4GE wrote: »
    Afrid wrote: »
    I think it would be better if we get more rank up materials than RDT's

    You may be right. But I don't see them making t2a readily available to make up for what many have lost.

    You maybe right too but I don't see them doing anything that will benefit the player base
  • R4GER4GE Member Posts: 1,530 ★★★★
    Afrid wrote: »
    R4GE wrote: »
    Afrid wrote: »
    I think it would be better if we get more rank up materials than RDT's

    You may be right. But I don't see them making t2a readily available to make up for what many have lost.

    You maybe right too but I don't see them doing anything that will benefit the player base

    We are at full agreeance there
  • Monk1Monk1 Member Posts: 760 ★★★★
    So bored of requests for rank down tickets... only option would be champ specific ones, or just 4* tickets. I just rank 5/50 Miss Marvel KK for diversity, but she scores just as many arena points so no big deal either way.

    People really just want tickets to change up there 5* rooster now better champs in basic crystals, which should not be given out
  • Run477Run477 Member Posts: 1,391 ★★★
    Monk1 wrote: »
    So bored of requests for rank down tickets... only option would be champ specific ones, or just 4* tickets. I just rank 5/50 Miss Marvel KK for diversity, but she scores just as many arena points so no big deal either way.

    People really just want tickets to change up there 5* rooster now better champs in basic crystals, which should not be given out

    Yep. When I start seeing people ask for only 4* rank down tickets, I might be more open to it.
  • R4GER4GE Member Posts: 1,530 ★★★★
    Monk1 wrote: »
    So bored of requests for rank down tickets... only option would be champ specific ones, or just 4* tickets. I just rank 5/50 Miss Marvel KK for diversity, but she scores just as many arena points so no big deal either way.

    People really just want tickets to change up there 5* rooster now better champs in basic crystals, which should not be given out

    For many, I believe that to be the case. But hard to narrow down who that is. I'm more on board with the idea for those who ranked 5*'s and are gonna suffer the loss of t2a. Even if its just 1 or 2 5* RDT it might be able to go a long way to pleasing those players w/o offsetting the game or creating a void where other players can abuse them to increase prestige or make up for bad choices. It really seems to be a hit and miss topic.
  • R4GER4GE Member Posts: 1,530 ★★★★
    Run477 wrote: »
    Monk1 wrote: »
    So bored of requests for rank down tickets... only option would be champ specific ones, or just 4* tickets. I just rank 5/50 Miss Marvel KK for diversity, but she scores just as many arena points so no big deal either way.

    People really just want tickets to change up there 5* rooster now better champs in basic crystals, which should not be given out

    Yep. When I start seeing people ask for only 4* rank down tickets, I might be more open to it.

    Those are actually the ones to easily abuse. Just my own opinion from what I seen when they were first introduced
  • Vdh2008Vdh2008 Member Posts: 966 ★★★★
    I don't care about 5 star RDTs, I want a few 4 star RDTs only to fix my defense. I have 4 5/50 4 stars ranked specifically for war, and now they are useless.
  • R4GER4GE Member Posts: 1,530 ★★★★
    Vdh2008 wrote: »
    I don't care about 5 star RDTs, I want a few 4 star RDTs only to fix my defense. I have 4 5/50 4 stars ranked specifically for war, and now they are useless.
    I'm not against it. I to am suffering the loss of champs due to the new system. I'm simply trying to share thoughts that others can probably improve on to find that in-between to where RDT's wouldn't/couldn't be abused and could "hopefully" increase our chances of getting them.
  • Monk1Monk1 Member Posts: 760 ★★★★
    Other option instead of tickets (which i don't want) is to give us some extra t4b to rank some more 'different' champs.
  • Mcord11758Mcord11758 Member Posts: 1,249 ★★★★
    They are not giving them no matter how much we scream.
  • WorkingAsIntendedWorkingAsIntended Member Posts: 164 ★★
    They need to give these out weeks before aw started and even before they started to think of changing war for no reason. To simply render antman even further useless is indeed a crime. Now nobody will ever use antman again now. You killed diversity with aw. Only place I would ever use a antman. Period!!

    Rdt should not be a thought it should have already happened and the fact that they have not even been mentioned is why kabam remains being mocked and ridiculed. It's a joke to ask for diversity after you bait and switched everyone who built there defenses up. I am appalled everyone is more outraged about this.
  • AmonthirAmonthir Member Posts: 754 ★★★
    I would support issuing RDTs only in the case that they refuse to budge from making Alliance-wide Diversity the default, simply due to the sheer number of champions duplicated across an Alliance that would need to be replaced with different champs. Otherwise, it is extremely annoying with just the BG-wide diversity, but doable. I would instead agree that rank-up materials be significantly easier to obtain for a period of time to ease this transition into their view of how AW should be done.

    Granted, I would prefer that they not focus things so much on Diversity, bring back Defender Kills, and revamp the nodes. And take away the energy usage for portals. Or flat take Portals out.
  • MyTaffyMyTaffy Member Posts: 144
    R4GE wrote: »
    Afrid wrote: »
    I think it would be better if we get more rank up materials than RDT's

    You may be right. But I don't see them making t2a readily available to make up for what many have lost.

    And in what base do you think they will make RDT available?

    I think it would be easier and make more sense to have more t2a or t4cc avilable than RDT.

  • R4GER4GE Member Posts: 1,530 ★★★★
    edited September 2017
    MyTaffy wrote: »
    R4GE wrote: »
    Afrid wrote: »
    I think it would be better if we get more rank up materials than RDT's

    You may be right. But I don't see them making t2a readily available to make up for what many have lost.

    And in what base do you think they will make RDT available?

    I think it would be easier and make more sense to have more t2a or t4cc avilable than RDT.

    Im not naive to think there is any hope of RDT's. I've played long enough to know how Kabam is on their standings. But I do take into consideration that certain views do get read and we may sometimes get what we want, or they find another solution to try and make up for certain losses or changes.

    Can argue RDT's all day. While they probably won't give them to us they may see the issue and arguments at hand and just go with the increase availability to acquire resources or another option. I consider that part as "hope" and less of me being naive.
  • R4GER4GE Member Posts: 1,530 ★★★★
    Its an "aim high but keep expectations low" situation and just hope for something to fix the scenario.
  • MyTaffyMyTaffy Member Posts: 144
    R4GE wrote: »
    MyTaffy wrote: »
    R4GE wrote: »
    Afrid wrote: »
    I think it would be better if we get more rank up materials than RDT's

    You may be right. But I don't see them making t2a readily available to make up for what many have lost.

    And in what base do you think they will make RDT available?

    I think it would be easier and make more sense to have more t2a or t4cc avilable than RDT.

    Im not naive to think there is any hope of RDT's. I've played long enough to know how Kabam is on their standings. But I do take into consideration that certain views do get read and we may sometimes get what we want, or they find another solution to try and make up for certain losses or changes.

    Can argue RDT's all day. While they probably won't give them to us they may see the issue and arguments at hand and just go with the increase availability to acquire resources or another option. I consider that part as "hope" and less of me being naive.

    I am not arguing if RDT is bad or good which I do not care and even if they issued it, I most likely would not use it because I like to rank up my champions, not rank down.

    I am just wondering why people keep on asking for RDT instead of asking for more T2a or t4cc since like you said Kabam read the threads and will know what people want and personally I think it is more likely for them to issue T2a/t4c than RDT. More ranked up champions == more diversity in AW to use. People can try different combination.

  • R4GER4GE Member Posts: 1,530 ★★★★
    MyTaffy wrote: »
    R4GE wrote: »
    MyTaffy wrote: »
    R4GE wrote: »
    Afrid wrote: »
    I think it would be better if we get more rank up materials than RDT's

    You may be right. But I don't see them making t2a readily available to make up for what many have lost.

    And in what base do you think they will make RDT available?

    I think it would be easier and make more sense to have more t2a or t4cc avilable than RDT.

    Im not naive to think there is any hope of RDT's. I've played long enough to know how Kabam is on their standings. But I do take into consideration that certain views do get read and we may sometimes get what we want, or they find another solution to try and make up for certain losses or changes.

    Can argue RDT's all day. While they probably won't give them to us they may see the issue and arguments at hand and just go with the increase availability to acquire resources or another option. I consider that part as "hope" and less of me being naive.

    I am not arguing if RDT is bad or good which I do not care and even if they issued it, I most likely would not use it because I like to rank up my champions, not rank down.

    I am just wondering why people keep on asking for RDT instead of asking for more T2a or t4cc since like you said Kabam read the threads and will know what people want and personally I think it is more likely for them to issue T2a/t4c than RDT. More ranked up champions == more diversity in AW to use. People can try different combination.

    With the possibility of increased resources I just simply question how easily they could make them more readily available in comparison to the years it took to actually acquire those same resources while not making them so easy that players who are still in lower aspects of the game and not ready for them could start to easily maintain them as well and possibly cause an offset or balance issue in the game.
  • MisterNiceGuyMisterNiceGuy Member Posts: 184
    Does anyone remember about a year ago when kabam essentially negated the perfect block team? I remember they let me sell my magneto and recover my catalyst. They could at least offer a period of time where selling a champ would recover the catalysts again....
This discussion has been closed.