**KNOWN AW ISSUE**
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
**KNOWN BG ISSUE**
We are aware of an issue with the seeding for the beginning of the BG season.
We are adding rewards to higher progression brackets to offset the additional grind.
More information here.
We are aware of an issue with the seeding for the beginning of the BG season.
We are adding rewards to higher progression brackets to offset the additional grind.
More information here.
**Arcade is being extra tricky with his Murder Box...**
It appears Arcade has been non-cooperative in his approach to this month's side quest and presented his clues in a nonsensical order. Lucky you, Summoners, we have our best and brightest on the case and those clues should now be a lot more straightforward. While messing around in Arcade's files we came across a phrase, highlighted and bolded, with sparkles and pointy arrows: "the abode for the dead" ... Maybe that will help you along the way!
It appears Arcade has been non-cooperative in his approach to this month's side quest and presented his clues in a nonsensical order. Lucky you, Summoners, we have our best and brightest on the case and those clues should now be a lot more straightforward. While messing around in Arcade's files we came across a phrase, highlighted and bolded, with sparkles and pointy arrows: "the abode for the dead" ... Maybe that will help you along the way!
Options
4* cavalier difficulty , misleading info by Kabam
HarryBosch
Posts: 78 ★
I just did the 4* cav event in sec 5 (3.1) This is the immortal hulk boss
I chose to do this first. Nowhere in the original post does it say I MUST do 1.1 then 1.2 then 1.3 and so on.
Kabam replies with this is IMPLIED. That’s fn bs. It is not my fault Kabam didn’t clearly CONVEY this had to be in order.
Kabam ... your customer / gamer experience team needs to learn a thing or two.
I’ll be escalating this issue ... watch
I chose to do this first. Nowhere in the original post does it say I MUST do 1.1 then 1.2 then 1.3 and so on.
Kabam replies with this is IMPLIED. That’s fn bs. It is not my fault Kabam didn’t clearly CONVEY this had to be in order.
Kabam ... your customer / gamer experience team needs to learn a thing or two.
I’ll be escalating this issue ... watch
15
Comments
If you are capable enough, try again with 4* later and start from 1.1.
Beyond that, there's this idea that floats around that if the game doesn't explicitly wave a giant sign that says "don't do this" then it is the game's fault if a player does something weird. That's not a reasonable expectation. Where the situation is ambiguous the game should provide reasonable information, but in this case there is no ambiguity to the order in which you are allowed to do an objective chain. Since the game clearly enforces the need to do objective chains in order, it would be unreasonable for the game to have to take the extra step of spelling this out for this one particular objective.
It’s the same “implied” logic bro.
Yes, I did the challenge a few months ago. But nowhere (then) did it say I had to do it in order. I “luckily” did it in order because I didn’t want to re-do the quest again.