Dropfaith wrote: » They aren't in tier 2 The system only stays in the tier for so long before it expands Ie if mmxvi waits too long they get a tier 2 ally To avoid hours upon hrs of waiting
Dropfaith wrote: » Okkkkayy wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » They aren't in tier 2 The system only stays in the tier for so long before it expands Ie if mmxvi waits too long they get a tier 2 ally To avoid hours upon hrs of waiting This is an unacceptable answer. And if you accept it you are(I want to say what everyone knows Probably you too, but I'll get banned) I don't care how long they have to wait. Neither should you. Why is someone else forced a loss cuz these spenders have to wait? You don't care because it's them. Would you care if your allaince joined Sunday and waited 7 hrs then had no opponent before aw went down costing you an entire war every week? I bet you would.. Well that's what happens in tier one without this system
Okkkkayy wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » They aren't in tier 2 The system only stays in the tier for so long before it expands Ie if mmxvi waits too long they get a tier 2 ally To avoid hours upon hrs of waiting This is an unacceptable answer. And if you accept it you are(I want to say what everyone knows Probably you too, but I'll get banned) I don't care how long they have to wait. Neither should you. Why is someone else forced a loss cuz these spenders have to wait?
Dropfaith wrote: » Okkkkayy wrote: » Making it this way. Guarantees t2 alliance a loss and t1 alliance a win My suggestion gives the t1 alliance a win(don't increase their war rating) While also giving the t2 alliance a CHANCE to win. Otherwise they have NO CHANCE. Especially with diversity! How do you NOT GET THIS?! Lol It still costs them the opportunity to have the war. Some people enjoy things to do..
Okkkkayy wrote: » Making it this way. Guarantees t2 alliance a loss and t1 alliance a win My suggestion gives the t1 alliance a win(don't increase their war rating) While also giving the t2 alliance a CHANCE to win. Otherwise they have NO CHANCE. Especially with diversity! How do you NOT GET THIS?! Lol
Dropfaith wrote: » Okkkkayy wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Okkkkayy wrote: » Making it this way. Guarantees t2 alliance a loss and t1 alliance a win My suggestion gives the t1 alliance a win(don't increase their war rating) While also giving the t2 alliance a CHANCE to win. Otherwise they have NO CHANCE. Especially with diversity! How do you NOT GET THIS?! Lol It still costs them the opportunity to have the war. Some people enjoy things to do.. You have GOT TO BE KIDDING ME THEY ENJOY WALKING OVER AN OPPOWNET THEY COULD AUTO DIGHT THRU?! DUDE! It's clear you know wha I'm saying. Just now trying to save face lol. Gotcha. I can tell you in t2. I have no desire to fight anyone that I could sleep thru. Dude..... cmon. Weak stretch. Just stop I'm not in t2 .. I'd prefer a fair system that doesn't screw an allaince out of a war just because another allaince doesn't try.
Okkkkayy wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Okkkkayy wrote: » Making it this way. Guarantees t2 alliance a loss and t1 alliance a win My suggestion gives the t1 alliance a win(don't increase their war rating) While also giving the t2 alliance a CHANCE to win. Otherwise they have NO CHANCE. Especially with diversity! How do you NOT GET THIS?! Lol It still costs them the opportunity to have the war. Some people enjoy things to do.. You have GOT TO BE KIDDING ME THEY ENJOY WALKING OVER AN OPPOWNET THEY COULD AUTO DIGHT THRU?! DUDE! It's clear you know wha I'm saying. Just now trying to save face lol. Gotcha. I can tell you in t2. I have no desire to fight anyone that I could sleep thru. Dude..... cmon. Weak stretch. Just stop
Dropfaith wrote: » Again not saying the system is fair. Just saying your concept isn't either...