**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
How feasible would it be to trade in sig stones?
FiiNCH
Posts: 1,664 ★★★★★
I’m sure I’m not alone when I say I’m sitting on a considerable amount of 4* sig stones/sig crystals (I bet some people could put my hoard to shame).
I could dump all these into my 4* champs, but I don’t see the point. I’ve already maxed sig’d all the 4* champs I want to, and I’m not bothered at all about building up my 4* roster. I feel the game had long moved past 4*’s.
Like we can do with quest crystals, it would be great if Kabam implemented a way to trade in 4* crystals for higher rarity sig crystals.
I could dump all these into my 4* champs, but I don’t see the point. I’ve already maxed sig’d all the 4* champs I want to, and I’m not bothered at all about building up my 4* roster. I feel the game had long moved past 4*’s.
Like we can do with quest crystals, it would be great if Kabam implemented a way to trade in 4* crystals for higher rarity sig crystals.
Post edited by Kabam Ahab on
0
Comments
No that would actually break the game
4*s no but then you’d have people trading in 5* Sig Stone Crystals for 6* Sig Stone Crystals and then it would break the game because they are very valuable. And maybe if they just did it by adding 4* Sig stones into 5* Sig stones you’ll run into the same problem and will ask to make them into 6* Sig stones
Until they are all max sig and generating max sig crystals for me, there's no such thing as too many 4* sig crystals.
If you think 20 5* sig stones is more valuable than 100 4* sig stones and thus worth the trade, you have to assume the devs also will believe 20 5* sig stones are more valuable than 100 4* sig stones, and by extension if the trade is allowed to happen all the 4* sig stones in the game would now more valuable, and thus everyone would need to get less of them.