Prof-X vs G2099

I just had an arena fight using Prof-X versus Guillotine 2099.

I reached 25 channeling charges, but didn't get the vigilance to bypass her cloaking. And before anyone asks, I understand that being power drained will drain Prof-X channeling charges. That wasn't the case here. I got to 25 charges before her first special 1, and still never got the vigilance passive.

Prof-X description states that the vigilance passive won't trigger against those with #Psychic Shielding, but I looked at G2099's tags and abilities, and I don't see that being applicable to her anywhere.

Has anyone else experienced this before? Is it a bugged interaction, or expected behavior? I don't think I've ever fought G2099 with Prof-X before, so I'm not sure what the interaction should be.

Thanks in advance,

Comments

Uvogin

It's not just G2099, it doesn't trigger against any tech champ

Edit: Seems like a bugged interaction to me

SkyLord7000

[Redacted]

mgj0630

Is that detailed somewhere? I mean, it wouldn't shock since they usually reduce abilities when fighting with class disadvantage, but they will usually state that explicitly in the champs abilities. Colossus for example...immune to armor break except when fighting tech champs.

I don't see anything like that in Prof-X's abilities description.

Uvogin

https://playcontestofchampions.com/champion-spotlight-professor-x/
In his spotlight, under weakness it states that he loses his counter to Miss and Evade effects against Tech Champions, I guess it was missed when adding it to the champion abilities.

magnus_xix

https://playcontestofchampions.com/champion-spotlight-professor-x/
In his spotlight, under weakness it states that he loses his counter to Miss and Evade effects against Tech Champions, I guess it was missed when adding it to the champion abilities.

For some bizarre reason that part of his abilities was taken out when they added the part about his psychic attacks.

It's still there if you check the original champion spotlight

mgj0630

Well I'll be damned. Nice find @Uvogin I hadn't even thought to look there.

Guess that makes it expected behavior.

unknown

This content has been removed.