**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
The nexus spins three times, correct?
So, the odds of NOT getting a 6* on any singular spin is 99/100 on this particular crystal.
The nexus, therefore, has odds of not getting a 6* of (99/100)^3, or 99/100 three times.
This comes out to about 970299/1000000, or .970299. To put it layman's terms, 97.03%.
Therefore, the odds of *getting* a 6* ar 1-.970299, or about 2.97%.
Slightly lower, yes. But this is offset by the fact that you get to choose the best result of those crystals.
A 3* has a 50% drop rate per crystal, right?
(1/2)^3 is 1/8. You have only a 1/8 chance to actually get a 3* in this crystal.
Odds are deceptively much better than everyone is making them out to be here....
Nexuses do, mate. Nexus cavs haven't been around for 'months' as you say-this is a very rare release. Regular cavs don't get the 'three times' treatment, as each nexus crystal is taking the individual odds and repeating it three times as opposed to one, then presenting the results for you to choose.
To couple with that, the offer DID have the information readily available. I've taken to clicking on the crystal in offers every time to check rates. It's not like they ever hid that information. It's like when people sell their soul in joke 'terms and service' agreements-it's not the company's fault that you didn't read an easily accessible bit of information.
As my comment edit got sent to 'approval' purgatory, let's break it down a little bit more.
They didn't hide this information at all. It was all present from the offer screen for anyone to click on and read before purchasing. To not do so is like ignoring the 'terms and service' agreement and clicking agree. If you sold your soul somewhere in there, it's your fault for not informing yourself, legally speaking.
Perhaps a bad example. However, I don't see these as 'shady'. They weren't advertised as 'better than a normal cav crystal'-they were advertised as 'we spin these odds three times, then pick one!' The odds were presented for you to see and make a decision yourself. If you bought without checking, not their fault when they made it readily available, right?
"The likeliest scenario is they still calculated joint odds on those and presented them as usual, or there was an oversight."
However, since I'm not Kabam, I can't confirm that.
If that is the case, however, my point will remain standing. Until then, we can only wait for Kabam themselves to chime in. I would hold your anger until then, alright?
Let's keep debate civil and not refrain to name-calling.