Isn't it a bit hypocritical

Crimson8399

There are number of champs Thor, Wolverine, ect that we can not get as 5*s yet we have to face them in events.

Comments

BUZZdog3000

Ya, and what's your point. Wolverine 5 star would break the game you would not be able to die.

Crimson8399

BUZZdog3000 wrote: »

Ya, and what's your point. Wolverine 5 star would break the game you would not be able to die.

I don't know how that would break the game considering there are a number of champs that can block/reverse healing effects. Not to mention nodes that heal block so it would not be game breaking at all. My point is like I stated, why do we have to face them if we can't get them. All champs should be available is my point especially with 6*s coming.

The_One

You have to face rank 5 5* but you can't get them either

WinterSpider112

What's your guys point some champs would be to powerful as 5 stars because they're powerful enough as 4 stars

GroundedWisdom

That's not the definition of hypocritical. Those Champs have never been offered as playable. The ones being added to the Crystals have previously been playable.

Crimson8399

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

That's not the definition of hypocritical. Those Champs have never been offered as playable. The ones being added to the Crystals have previously been playable.

Hypocritical: characterized by behavior that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel. I do not know the exact reason why Kabam did not include these champs for players to obtain but they did so because they feel either they are to powerful or unbalanced for us to have but not them.

Crimson8399

Also I understand that they were never offered but that's not my point, they all should have been is what I'm saying.

GroundedWisdom

So because they can offer whatever content they choose, that makes it hypocritical that they're not adding Champs not previously released as playable? You do understand it is their game, right?

ForumGuy

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

So because they can offer whatever content they choose, that makes it hypocritical that they're not adding Champs not previously released as playable? You do understand it is their game, right?

Don't ruin another thread!!!!!

Crimson8399

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

So because they can offer whatever content they choose, that makes it hypocritical that they're not adding Champs not previously released as playable? You do understand it is their game, right?

You do understand that owning something doesn't negate the fact someone can be a hypocrite. So yes it does.

ForumGuy

OP, they're too scared to add them. I mean here's an example of what a 5* SW could do.

Even doctor strange's disappointing self could do very well as a 5*.
...Basically they'd be op, and kabam says they won't add older champs like that or whatever bs they said. It's like...what was the point of nerfing them than lol.

Crimson8399

ForumGuy wrote: »

OP, they're too scared add them. I mean here's an example of what a 5* SW could do.

Even doctor strange's disappointing self could do very well as a 5*.
...Basically they'd be op, and kabam says they won't add older champs like that or whatever bs they said. It's like...what was the point of nerfing them than lol.

That's a whole other issue. If they won't release them as 5*s unnerf them. Four stars will be almost useless vs 6 stars anyway.

Crimson8399

Also my exact point. We have to face them with crazy stats like that but can't get them.

Crimson8399

Dropfaith wrote: »

If we could only face what we could get this stale game dies faster .. yay

I'm not saying that. We could not get Kang or Thanos for a long time and they can always add boss characters that we can't get. But these are just basic champs. Also very funny that ur post about something dying was ur 666 post.

ForumGuy

Dropfaith wrote: »

Crimson8399 wrote: »

Dropfaith wrote: »

If we could only face what we could get this stale game dies faster .. yay

I'm not saying that. We could not get Kang or Thanos for a long time and they can always add boss characters that we can't get. But these are just basic champs. Also very funny that ur post about something dying was ur 666 post.

Frank strange
Symbiotes
Ultron drones
Unstoppable ant
Spider witch?
Electro luke
Modok
Jessica Jones.
There a huge list of unplayable

Those clearly don't need to be playable tho lol. Well Jessica Jones and M.O.D.O.K do.*

Crimson8399

Those were pretty funny. I loved Ust. Antmans S2.

flygamer

the game will always win....

DaMunk

King Groot has very high regen and he's available as a 5*. Blade has great regen from what I've seen. Wolverine wouldn't break the game if made as a 5*. With the nerf certain champs revived they would be fine as 5*s. Voodoo is ever bit as powerful as SW. Thor is not close to the top of cosmic damage dealers. No reason I can see not to release those champs but Joe Fixit and Electro won't be added either.

GroundedWisdom

Crimson8399 wrote: »

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

So because they can offer whatever content they choose, that makes it hypocritical that they're not adding Champs not previously released as playable? You do understand it is their game, right?

You do understand that owning something doesn't negate the fact someone can be a hypocrite. So yes it does.

They have full creative license to add whatever they want for content. That doesn't make them hypocrites. That makes them Game Developers.

GroundedWisdom

Dropfaith wrote: »

Crimson8399 wrote: »

Dropfaith wrote: »

If we could only face what we could get this stale game dies faster .. yay

I'm not saying that. We could not get Kang or Thanos for a long time and they can always add boss characters that we can't get. But these are just basic champs. Also very funny that ur post about something dying was ur 666 post.

Frank strange
Symbiotes
Ultron drones
Unstoppable ant
Spider witch?
Electro luke
Modok
Jessica Jones.
There a huge list of unplayable

Still say I'd like Spider Witch to be playable. Lol.

Crimson8399

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

Crimson8399 wrote: »

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

So because they can offer whatever content they choose, that makes it hypocritical that they're not adding Champs not previously released as playable? You do understand it is their game, right?

You do understand that owning something doesn't negate the fact someone can be a hypocrite. So yes it does.

They have full creative license to add whatever they want for content. That doesn't make them hypocrites. That makes them Game Developers.

If I own something and I say you can't do that but I can it is within my right to do so but still makes me a hypocrite.

Kestrelle

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

Crimson8399 wrote: »

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

So because they can offer whatever content they choose, that makes it hypocritical that they're not adding Champs not previously released as playable? You do understand it is their game, right?

You do understand that owning something doesn't negate the fact someone can be a hypocrite. So yes it does.

They have full creative license to add whatever they want for content. That doesn't make them hypocrites. That makes them Game Developers.

Someone really needs to get you a dictionary. If you're going to contradict people, at least be right. If M Night Shamalamadingding got upset with another author for misleading everyone through an entire story before hitting them with a twist, full creative license be damned, he'd still be a hypocrite

GroundedWisdom

Crimson8399 wrote: »

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

Crimson8399 wrote: »

GroundedWisdom wrote: »

So because they can offer whatever content they choose, that makes it hypocritical that they're not adding Champs not previously released as playable? You do understand it is their game, right?

You do understand that owning something doesn't negate the fact someone can be a hypocrite. So yes it does.

They have full creative license to add whatever they want for content. That doesn't make them hypocrites. That makes them Game Developers.

If I own something and I say you can't do that but I can it is within my right to do so but still makes me a hypocrite.

By that standard everyone should be able to design and modify the game. Call it what you like, but it's their job. I don't call the people at McDonald's hypocrites because they won't let me back into the kitchen.

Kestrelle

That is an absolutely terrible analogy. The better one would be that they won't let you into their kitchen, but get mad at you when you won't let them into yours.

More importantly, stop trying to assign context to definitions. That's not how languages work

unknown

Based on champs like mephisto and Hyperion, I just wish they would fix scarlet witch and Dr strange back to their original selves

Kabam Pertinax

Hey everyone, while I appreciate that this thread had the potential to be a discussion on in-game content vs. content available to players, this thread has devolved into arguing semantics and is no longer considered constructive. For this reason, I'll be closing this thread down.