Give us better tools to see who joined AQ

As an officer, in an alliance with 29 to 30 members, there's no way I can check who joined AQ fast...each day I take screenshots of 3 BG'S, and compare them with the members list...it takes a lot of time to find 1 person out of 30 this way... I'm pretty sure I'm not missing anything here...it would be really helpful for a lot of alliances (I think) if officers could see who joined and who didn't...under the"members" section in the"alliance" tab, if there were just a little icon (like the "online" icon), or the AQ sign from potions from the shop if someone joined, this would be soo helpful. Thanks if you at least consider this.

Comments

MrSakuragi

What I do is go to the history button, click on view details for a day and scroll to the bottom of the Top Contributors list. Anyone with a “-“ next to their name didn’t join. Anyone with a 0 joined, but didn’t take any fights.

mortenhy

What I do is go to the history button, click on view details for a day and scroll to the bottom of the Top Contributors list. Anyone with a “-“ next to their name didn’t join. Anyone with a 0 joined, but didn’t take any fights.

Thanks for answering, I also do that..but you can only do that after AQ is finished (sorry for the English spelling)... let's say we are missing 1 person in all 3 BG'S, and we are missing a path etc, 6 hours before AQ ends, then it would be really helpful to know who "is slacking" so I can tag them in Line...not sure if I can explain it properly in english, very sorry if this doesn't make sense. But I appreciate very much your feedback.

MrSakuragi

Oh yeah that makes sense, for the current day. No way to do that as far as I know. It would be nice for the lists on each map to show the assigned battle group.

mortenhy

Oh yeah that makes sense, for the current day. No way to do that as far as I know. It would be nice for the lists on each map to show the assigned battle group.

Exactly mate 👍

mortenhy

I didn't write in my original post, that it's not when AQ is over, it's while AQ is live.

Demonzfyre

The side bar menu tells you the points of each BG split out by each participant.

SummonerNR

Yes, need better way for current day to tell who is not in AQ yet.

Also in History, a new person shows in list of days before they even came into alliance (with same “dash = 0 pts”) making it seem like they were slacking and never joined AQ.
And need a way (like AW) to click on “Member Withdrawn” in AQ history and see WHO it was.

Jeal79

The side bar menu tells you the points of each BG split out by each participant.

That doesn't help though. You still need to compare to the overall member list to work out who isn't in.

What would be useful though is something similar to the way point distribution is shown in the History section. I think when on the AQ map, beside the point total at the top of the screen there could be a small "i" symbol the same as there is in war... Clicking it in AQ would display the same as would be visible on the history where you can see the current LIVE contribution of all members. "-" represents not joined and "0" represents joined but not yet fought.

This would be a lot simpler than the current process of elimination methods and would be a great QoL update for alliance officers & leaders

MrSakuragi

The side bar menu tells you the points of each BG split out by each participant.
That doesn't help though. You still need to compare to the overall member list to work out who isn't in.

What would be useful though is something similar to the way point distribution is shown in the History section. I think when on the AQ map, beside the point total at the top of the screen there could be a small "i" symbol the same as there is in war... Clicking it in AQ would display the same as would be visible on the history where you can see the current LIVE contribution of all members. "-" represents not joined and "0" represents joined but not yet fought.

This would be a lot simpler than the current process of elimination methods and would be a great QoL update for alliance officers & leaders

Agreed. One of the challenges from the design side is that there would need to be a list of everyone in the alliance, not just the BG as you can jump into any BG unless all are in the map and it’s locked, regardless of where you are assigned.

Jeal79

Yep, that's 100% what I'm suggesting. Regardless of what BG you are in, clicking the "i" symbol would display the point contribution from every alliance member

mortenhy

The side bar menu tells you the points of each BG split out by each participant.

Yes I know, but that doesn't do me any good.. unless I'm missing something?

mortenhy

Yes, need better way for current day to tell who is not in AQ yet.

Also in History, a new person shows in list of days before they even came into alliance (with same “dash = 0 pts”) making it seem like they were slacking and never joined AQ.
And need a way (like AW) to click on “Member Withdrawn” in AQ history and see WHO it was.

I totally agree with you 👍

mortenhy

The side bar menu tells you the points of each BG split out by each participant.
That doesn't help though. You still need to compare to the overall member list to work out who isn't in.

What would be useful though is something similar to the way point distribution is shown in the History section. I think when on the AQ map, beside the point total at the top of the screen there could be a small "i" symbol the same as there is in war... Clicking it in AQ would display the same as would be visible on the history where you can see the current LIVE contribution of all members. "-" represents not joined and "0" represents joined but not yet fought.

This would be a lot simpler than the current process of elimination methods and would be a great QoL update for alliance officers & leaders

Agreed 👍

mortenhy

The side bar menu tells you the points of each BG split out by each participant.
That doesn't help though. You still need to compare to the overall member list to work out who isn't in.

What would be useful though is something similar to the way point distribution is shown in the History section. I think when on the AQ map, beside the point total at the top of the screen there could be a small "i" symbol the same as there is in war... Clicking it in AQ would display the same as would be visible on the history where you can see the current LIVE contribution of all members. "-" represents not joined and "0" represents joined but not yet fought.

This would be a lot simpler than the current process of elimination methods and would be a great QoL update for alliance officers & leaders
Agreed. One of the challenges from the design side is that there would need to be a list of everyone in the alliance, not just the BG as you can jump into any BG unless all are in the map and it’s locked, regardless of where you are assigned.

Yup agreed 👍

mortenhy

The side bar menu tells you the points of each BG split out by each participant.
That doesn't help though. You still need to compare to the overall member list to work out who isn't in.

What would be useful though is something similar to the way point distribution is shown in the History section. I think when on the AQ map, beside the point total at the top of the screen there could be a small "i" symbol the same as there is in war... Clicking it in AQ would display the same as would be visible on the history where you can see the current LIVE contribution of all members. "-" represents not joined and "0" represents joined but not yet fought.

This would be a lot simpler than the current process of elimination methods and would be a great QoL update for alliance officers & leaders

Agreed

unknown

This content has been removed.

mortenhy

I think this problem is solved by divvying up duties amongst BGs
I have done this as an officer for all BG's before and it's tough... im not an officer of a single BG, i have a good sense of my BG and if i see 9/10 have joined i can pretty quickly scan and figure out who i need to tag

much harder to do that over 3 bgs and 30 members.

The other option would be to have AQ show up like AW attack... when i look at AW attack, a member who hasnt joined is reserved. Something similar for AQ could work

Hmm, that's actually a good advice, thanks.. I will take it into consideration 👍