**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Regarding Brian Grant’s Most Recent Video
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
There could even be a similar amount of units as before the changes, so that players who used to grind alts for gifting at a reasonable rate could continue to do that. The additional units added by the update to act 1-3 could be made up of these credits, meaning the situation is exactly as it was before the update. Then anyone complaining, would just be complaining that they couldn't get more stuff.
So a GGC gifted from a Cav account will contain items that benefit mainly Cavs (eg 5* shards, smaller T5b amounts, T2A etc 5* roster progression items).
TB GGCs will contain larger T5b portions, T6b, T3A, 6* shards etc items that focus on 6* roster progression.
So even using such farming methods, because the account will at most be Conquerer, the items gifted out will be mostly useless to main accounts that are Cav and above, ie indirectly curbing the exploit.
The *really* big problem is that a level gate disproportionately impacts casual spenders - the players you want the most to attract. A casual player that doesn't grind a ton, and bridges the gap between the time they have available and where they want to be by spending, is the sort of person more likely to spend to participate in the gifting event. They are one of the foundational spenders supporting the game. And we'd be turning many of them off with a level gate.
At most, you’re looking at V8/A7.3 energy costs, which is roughly, give or take, 40 refills and maybe 30-40 revives. Anything extra goes into stash and is subjected to natural expiration.
Considering the “unlimited” nature of GGCs, the small issue of revives/refills is something I’m willing to accept to curb the gifting exploit.
Eg. A fresh UC farming 120k units and gifting himself all the GGCs, which will result in insane amounts of 6* shards, Cats etc, which will likely allow him to get multiple R3s and even R4s.
1.If you’re in an alliance, it’s likely everyone is roughly in the same level/progression tier. So trading within negates the complication of “trading up/down”. (Mantra of “trade with people you know”)
2. Reduces scamming of newer/unknowing players on global because the odds of trading “down” is a lot higher for scammers than trading “up”.
3. Friction between non-exploiters won’t exist because titles can be clearly seen on anyone’s’ profile.
The sort of post like yours is right in line with those ones that say “shhhh don’t make posts about this revive drop spot in act 3.X”. As if you’re being sneaky and stopping kabam from finding out.
They know. They know what’s going on in their game that they collect nonstop data on. If thousands of new accounts are being made and the units not being spent, they’ll know. If all those accounts send gifts to the same players, they’ll know. You aren’t getting one over them by keeping these situations “quiet”.
There is no loss to Kabam in terms of profit because these units are farmed and not bought. So it doesn’t affect their bottom line.
The only thing that will be affected is the “new players/accounts created” statistics that will show a true number, instead of an artificial growth due to dummy accounts created (which I might add, will never be used again once this gifting event is over).
To replace that £100 I will now just go and grind out 2 accounts (which is 12 hours over the next 45 days, so about an 15 mins a day), and get myself 3k units. That’s £100 Kabam lose out on. I’m not going to then spend £100 for 3100 units more, when I could just grind some more accounts
And yes, I know not everyone has the time to make up that difference. But some will, and that means that this will affect Kabam’s bottom line if it continues.
The other side of it is I could see how it could be milked. I'm just not completely convinced it's unfair. I think this has more to do with the "competitiveness of F2P" than anything. Which BG is concerned with. I'm not of the same mindset of F2P/P2P, or any comparison or competition therein. I think there's way too much stock invested in that pride.
I suppose I'm cool either way. If something is actually egregious or unfair in an imbalancing way, I'm all for action. If it's just because of having eyes on the plates of others, meh.
I’d love to know how you know that Kabam don’t care though, seeing as they haven’t commented on this situation.
I’m not sure what your assumption on me was based on, but if 15 minutes, or even an hour a day of playing a game excludes someone from having a job or family, then I guess most of the forum community is included in that. Shame, my family and coworkers will be devastated.
- Cap at 1x gift per day. 1 gift = 1 point in the event. No rank rewards, just milestones. And anyone can easily get these.
- No gifting event this year. We don't need another money event
There’s a continuum of this stuff that doesn’t just jump straight from “legitimate player” to “bot.” And it begs the question of whether this will legitimize this kind of activity, and make it harder to draw the line on where this becomes abuse. Maybe the community itself softens their stance on this, when everyone has a friend of a friend who’s doing it. Does this blur the lines on what constitutes abuse? I think that’s a legitimate concern here Kabam should consider carefully.