Quicksilver

AMS94AMS94 Member Posts: 1,776 ★★★★★
in General Discussion
If I remember correctly a few months back we got some info that Kabam is working on Sandman & also looking at ways to introduce Quicksilver in the contest alongwith the animations that he deserves
So even if we assume Quicksilver ws not under production at that time, it's still safe to say that Kabam have already invested some good amount of time on his character & animations
So if Kabam have already done some brainstorming about him that means they had plans to introduce him in the game anyway, specially considering that they knew he is one of the fan favourites & the community has been asking fr him fr a long time
So if all of that is true, why is he still in the poll bcoz it seems like Kabam had plans to release him anyway irrespective of the poll results
Note : Don't be a disagree spammer & try to add value to the discussion through constructive comments

Comments

  • Total_Domin01Total_Domin01 Member Posts: 1,015 ★★★★
    That final comment almost makes me want to add a disagree (I didn’t though)

    I imagine that in a game that doesn’t focus on speedsters, it would be hard to add them. So eventually people would want them to add them, and it would be good to have ideas on how to implement them in a way that ain’t ****. My take on it
  • AburaeesAburaees Member Posts: 514 ★★★
    Kabam have confirmed they don’t have plans to release Quicksilver in 2022…unless he wins the vote. Same goes for everyone else in the voting pool.
    So I guess it’s a matter of do you want him in 2022 or at an indeterminate time in 2023 and beyond?
  • SkyLord7000SkyLord7000 Member Posts: 4,027 ★★★★★
    By testing I believe they were using the tech in Hawkeyes kit. Now that was shown as a success, QuickSilver will likely have similar tech in his kit if added. If he doesn’t win he will not be added this year. Kabam has no plans to add any of the champs in other then the winner of the Summoners Choice. Testing was likely to see if QuickSilver could even be added in the Summoner Choice at all.

    (IE they could even create a champ with a slow down time mechanic)

    Sorry I disagreed and tried to add value to the discussion through constructive comments :)
  • AMS94AMS94 Member Posts: 1,776 ★★★★★
    SkyLord7000 said:

    By testing I believe they were using the tech in Hawkeyes kit. Now that was shown as a success, QuickSilver will likely have similar tech in his kit if added. If he doesn’t win he will not be added this year. Kabam has no plans to add any of the champs in other then the winner of the Summoners Choice. Testing was likely to see if QuickSilver could even be added in the Summoner Choice at all.

    (IE they could even create a champ with a slow down time mechanic)

    Sorry I disagreed and tried to add value to the discussion through constructive comments :)

    Yeah that seems a reasonable explanation
    Also the disagrees aren't a problem as long as there's a reason fr it
    Problem is unnecessary disagree spams without adding anything to the discussion, which happens way too often on the forums
    I've seen disagrees not only on opinions & thoughts but even on factually correct comments
    That's why had to add that note
  • SkyLord7000SkyLord7000 Member Posts: 4,027 ★★★★★
    AMS94 said:

    SkyLord7000 said:

    By testing I believe they were using the tech in Hawkeyes kit. Now that was shown as a success, QuickSilver will likely have similar tech in his kit if added. If he doesn’t win he will not be added this year. Kabam has no plans to add any of the champs in other then the winner of the Summoners Choice. Testing was likely to see if QuickSilver could even be added in the Summoner Choice at all.

    (IE they could even create a champ with a slow down time mechanic)

    Sorry I disagreed and tried to add value to the discussion through constructive comments :)

    Yeah that seems a reasonable explanation
    Also the disagrees aren't a problem as long as there's a reason fr it
    Problem is unnecessary disagree spams without adding anything to the discussion, which happens way too often on the forums
    I've seen disagrees not only on opinions & thoughts but even on factually correct comments
    That's why had to add that note
    AMS94 said:

    Note : Don't be a disagree spammer & try to add value to the discussion through constructive comments

    Maybe this came off wrong then. My interpretation of it was that you didn’t want people to add value to the discussion through constructive comments.

    I thought it read like:

    Don’t
    1. Be a disagree spammer
    2. try to add value to the discussion through constructive comments

    I now understand it probably reads:

    1. Don’t be a disagree spammer
    2. try to add value to the discussion through constructive comments

    Another way that sentence could be worded would be:

    Please explain your reasoning if you disagree.

    Sorry for the confusion
Sign In or Register to comment.