Should ultron have sabertooth type of fix??

Parth_vanshParth_vansh Member Posts: 46
I think ultron is already good without that bug but he was an option to aol and lol unless kabam only wants to brush aegon in them, I think people were having more fun with him in aol and lol than aegon,
So if they let ultron keep 1-2 cauterize then I don't think that will be too op considering other existing champions.
Let this be another saberman thing were it was your fault but you still made him fun to play and made carina challenge, maybe ultron can have that too,
Let's not forget that he is one of the best villain in marvel but as we know kabam that they don't give justice to the name of the character so idk.
But still there is hope

Comments

  • NojokejaymNojokejaym Member Posts: 4,126 ★★★★★
    You can have 1-2 cauterize up
  • Parth_vanshParth_vansh Member Posts: 46
    I didn't clear the Cauterize that it should be of sp3
  • Parth_vanshParth_vansh Member Posts: 46
    @KabamMike can this happen, atleast it would be one thing that will make community happy in a very long time
  • ChaosMax1012ChaosMax1012 Member Posts: 3,113 ★★★★★
    Probably not gonna happen but wouldn’t mind seeing a cauterize each sp3 capping at 3-5. Unfortunately I don’t see time being spent on a champ like ultron over champs that desperately need the attention.
  • edited February 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • edited February 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • AverageDesiAverageDesi Member Posts: 5,260 ★★★★★

    Sabertooth was an unforseen interaction that became too strong. Ultron's is a bug . Both are not the same to draw a comparison

    Believe what he is refering to is his current form which he is still able to keep his persistent charges going each fight so long as he does L3. The passive furies will never drop. He can literally go on forever ramping up with each fight. No cap.
    Don't think he was referring to when he was actually bugged.
    So the comparison is pretty valid.
    Sabertooth was never bugged.arleast not in Context. And also what @Zan0 said
  • This content has been removed.
  • edited February 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,103 ★★★★★

    I really have to draw this out.

    You get ST. You get Sassy. Put ST in a fight. If you launch an S3 you keep the Persistent charge you would have otherwise lost. If you finish with the s3 you bank the large fury. If you launch s3 while having a fury buff you bank both.

    You can do this for the whole quest. The longer the quest the more furies you can bank if you do it right.

    I don't see where you guys are missing this.

    I think the issue people are having is that what you’re saying is false. ST has a cap on furies, you can’t build forever. When you did carina with 4* ST did you have furies building forever? You did not.
  • edited February 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Graves_3Graves_3 Member Posts: 1,541 ★★★★★
    edited February 2022

    What's the cap for his s3 furies?
    Not l1 furies. I know there's a cap on that.

    Sabertooth has a total cap of around 30-35 furies. He didn't before.
    Technically this is true but practically he couldn’t gain more than 21 furies in a quest in the best case scenario and could use those for 1 fight. So he did have a practical limit on how many furies he could stack. What Sasquatch synergy gave him was the ability to stack unlimited furies. Kabam fixed this by putting a limit on the number of furies that sabertooth can stack to 30.
  • ShadowstrikeShadowstrike Member Posts: 3,110 ★★★★★
    The reason why Sabertooth was easier to fix was because it wasn't a drastic change to his kit but rather a specific interaction that requires two champions of an existing Synergy to be activated. That is easier to fix then it is to change the kit.
Sign In or Register to comment.