AW bugs and the compensation

Crusaderjr

so i dont want to be THAT guy but is this a visual bug or is aw going down hill again??

and another question i know we should be patient with this compensation just hoping kabam didnt forget about it...

Comments

SummonerNR

Visual bug ? WAR Rating change ?
Are you borderline between Tier 5 and 6 ?
1st war at Tier 5 loss but frozen rating, but some others below you in 6 who were not frozen then jumped over you.
So next war you were in Tier-6 and so got to have a change (not frozen) in WR.

Crusaderjr

Visual bug ? WAR Rating change ?
Are you borderline between Tier 5 and 6 ?
1st war at Tier 5 loss but frozen rating, but some others below you in 6 who were not frozen then jumped over you.
So next war you were in Tier-6 and so got to have a change (not frozen) in WR.

thx ill have to look into that but weve been holding steady for a while, but i know thats not the case for others.

SummonerNR

Yeah, that frozen / not frozen boundary situation could use a change.

SUGGESTION…
Instead of each war in off-season basing Tier 5 vs 6 on current WR and % of # of alliances, it should be “Stable” based on end of the past season.

While also instigating a hard “Cap” on what War Rating from those in Tier-6 or below could grow to.
They should be capped at 1 less WR than the lowest frozen alliance has for WR at the bottom of Tier-5.
Instead of Tier-6 winning alliances potentially being able to jump over some on bottom of Tier-5.

So if end of season bottom of Tier-5 has WR of 2110, then the max that any “non-frozen” Tier-6 alliances could climb from winning in off-season would be up to 2109. And that lowest Tier-5 team would thus also stay exactly at 2110 thru whole off-season.

So there wouldn’t be any floating between that 5/6 boundary.
@Kabam Miike

Okizze

You may of been right on the line of tier5/6 and possibly got pushed out by tier6 alliances that have won during off season. I have no idea how that all works and if this is possible but that’s my first thought.