**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
The ability to pass the gauntlet
KeepOnMovin
Posts: 63
Hi,
Lately i have begun to have personal issues that make me feel that some changes are in order. Specifically that i may want to retire from this game. But i am the leader of an alliance that is active and growing so to do so would be to sentence my group to having no real "leader" and 1 less active participant. That seems pretty unfair. These guys are genuinely not interested in playing elsewhere or they would change alliances. What would be really nice is if there was a way for a leader to pass leadership of an alliance to an officer in the event they are either unable to play or retiring. That way u could free up some server space (less maintenance for u 'wink wink') and clear out so many of these dead alliances that are using unnecessary space in the game, and then the dedicated players can move up and on. It would be something of reward for service and dedication for those who stick out the tough times. I would hate my teammates to suffer because i have things that need tending. What do other players think about this?
Lately i have begun to have personal issues that make me feel that some changes are in order. Specifically that i may want to retire from this game. But i am the leader of an alliance that is active and growing so to do so would be to sentence my group to having no real "leader" and 1 less active participant. That seems pretty unfair. These guys are genuinely not interested in playing elsewhere or they would change alliances. What would be really nice is if there was a way for a leader to pass leadership of an alliance to an officer in the event they are either unable to play or retiring. That way u could free up some server space (less maintenance for u 'wink wink') and clear out so many of these dead alliances that are using unnecessary space in the game, and then the dedicated players can move up and on. It would be something of reward for service and dedication for those who stick out the tough times. I would hate my teammates to suffer because i have things that need tending. What do other players think about this?
0
Comments