Monthly EQ nodes messed up again?

I remember we had a colossus that needed to be bled to take advantage of nodes. Now a nebula that needs to be shocked. I'm not a game designer, so not sure how things work. But is there a way to have the game filter out champs with certain immunities? Like if you know that next month's EQ nodes involve bleeding/shock/poison etc for a particular chapter, filter out champs with those immunities before randomly picking the defenders.

Comments

ReignkingTW

Ha, I just did this one. Brute forced it with Warlock.

Just wrong.

BabyMiike

Fr took me forever

Savage123456789

Oh yeah, it wasn't a difficult. I did it with hercules. But I have a good enough roster to brute force it. What about people that have limited champions or next time it's fight that is more difficult than this

Buttehrs

I mean with 220+ champs it's gonna happen, but it seems to happen alot more lately. Kabam really needs to do some proofreading before they let stuff go live like this.

djr17

She's metal. Red Magneto shuts down most of the junk from her and the node. Easy peasy.

unknown

This content has been removed.

BuggyDClown

I did with HB
Easy.
Can be done by any other champ as well not biggie

But as from perspective of design, it's lazy and illogical design

Malreck04

It’s not that bad, someone doing exploration should be able to do it, her sp1 is easy to dex so you just need to be able to intercept for a few seconds

Giuliameij

To all people who say it is not that bad. That is not the point of this post. The point is these quests are designed to reward the use of champions that can deal with the nodes. If you then place a defender that can not be hurt by the node it nullifies the design of the quest.
All OP is asking is for Kabam to look at the defenders when placing them with certain node combinations in the Cav EQ.
Because placing Nebula here is against its design.

Sw0rdMaster

Because placing Nebula here is against its design.

Maybe it was placed there intentionally by design?

Anyways it's just 1 fight and wasn't a show stopper.

SHIELD4AGENT

the Bishop from months ago was way worse than this, it was in the middle of the path. atleast this nebula is in the first fight

ReignkingTW

the Bishop from months ago was way worse than this, it was in the middle of the path. atleast this nebula is in the first fight

Which they acknowledged was odd, said they were going to look into it, and the conversation died off.

AMS94

Because placing Nebula here is against its design.
Maybe it was placed there intentionally by design?

Anyways it's just 1 fight and wasn't a show stopper.

Yeah it's definitely intentional
I have been noticing some of these placements in Cav EQ in recent months
In this month as well there is another which should've there... don't remember which one though
This one sticks out so much probably bcoz the level of absurdity & difficulty is more than others of similar category
Every Cav EQ for past few months have had a few fights like this but none have been at the level as this one

Rudolph_Raindeer

I didnt even notice that. Just took her down. Need to start reading those nodes

Jeal79

I thought this one was a naughty addition. Sym nullifies your unblockable buff every time you gain it so you can't play the class node the way it's supposed to be played. Ended up having to fight him with a science champ that I'd brought in for the boss

Savage123456789

To all people who say it is not that bad. That is not the point of this post. The point is these quests are designed to reward the use of champions that can deal with the nodes. If you then place a defender that can not be hurt by the node it nullifies the design of the quest.
All OP is asking is for Kabam to look at the defenders when placing them with certain node combinations in the Cav EQ.
Because placing Nebula here is against its design.

I'm glad someone gets it, lol.

Savage123456789

Because placing Nebula here is against its design.
Maybe it was placed there intentionally by design?

Anyways it's just 1 fight and wasn't a show stopper.
Yeah it's definitely intentional
I have been noticing some of these placements in Cav EQ in recent months
In this month as well there is another which should've there... don't remember which one though
This one sticks out so much probably bcoz the level of absurdity & difficulty is more than others of similar category
Every Cav EQ for past few months have had a few fights like this but none have been at the level as this one

If it's intentional then I'm less worried cause then someone is looking at these fights and they might know what they are doing