Not replying to the poll, because the answer is nuanced. Take away the Paragons and Thronebreakers that lurk in lower brackets and it’s actually pretty enjoyable. To the extent of loving it? Probably not. It’s never fun when you get a bad draft that effectively causes death over time with no mitigation.
This Months BG meta is making me considering quitting the game. Only like 20 champs are useful.. if you don’t get lucky with the draw you might as well quit out and start over. Plus it’s too stressful. It’s just not fun anymore.. I’m sorry.
This Months BG meta is making me considering quitting the game. Only like 20 champs are useful.. if you don’t get lucky with the draw you might as well quit out and start over. Plus it’s too stressful. It’s just not fun anymore.. I’m sorry. If you only think 20 champs are useful in this Meta that probably explains why you aren't enjoying. There are tons of options that can put up scores of 45,000+ on offense and tons of defensive options that will give up less than that when they aren't hard countered.
You need a “somewhat like” and a “somewhat dislike” option. I’ll go with the latter.I liked it at first, when I felt like I had it figured out. Especially when I matched with someone who did not. I put together a pretty solid deck and things seemed to go OK. But, after more people figured out the better champs to take, everyone has very similar decks, the same 3-5 of my champs get banned every matchup and then you have to rely on luck to get a good hand. For what it’s worth, luck doesn’t usually seem to be on my side. Add the modders, lag and dropped inputs to that, and it doesn’t help the experience. Feels great to win when it’s a solid matchup with strategy, skill and luck … feels like absolute **** when you lose because of something out of your control.
This Months BG meta is making me considering quitting the game. Only like 20 champs are useful.. if you don’t get lucky with the draw you might as well quit out and start over. Plus it’s too stressful. It’s just not fun anymore.. I’m sorry. If you only think 20 champs are useful in this Meta that probably explains why you aren't enjoying. There are tons of options that can put up scores of 45,000+ on offense and tons of defensive options that will give up less than that when they aren't hard countered. It’s not exactly 20 of course but you end up choosing the same old champs..Red Mags, OP Techs, OP Mystics, some Comics.. etc..
Whoever voted “loving it”, I find that very hard to believe.
Hate it. Came in thinking I would do pretty well. But RNG on OG SW is terrible. I can never pull Hulkling or Galan when they aren't banned when my opponent gets both. I am only doing the objectives when they come up every couple of days. It's kinda dumb that I have to take R4 and R3 champs out of my deck for 5 star champs. Feels like a step back.
My favourite VC meta to date.For paragons with built out rosters, it’s fun. I can understand the frustration at lower ranks though.I’ve read and listened to arguments over the season and although I think it’s great fun, I think Kabam should lower the restrictiveness of future metas.
My favourite VC meta to date.For paragons with built out rosters, it’s fun. I can understand the frustration at lower ranks though.I’ve read and listened to arguments over the season and although I think it’s great fun, I think Kabam should lower the restrictiveness of future metas. Node combinations like this don’t belong to VT.They would rather be used at GC where the more experienced and advanced rosters should be.Nothing of these two happens now.VT has a relatively “hard” node and GC is full of noob accounts due to Prestige matchmaking.In my opinion Battlegrounds is a huge mess at the moment 🙁