Can someone explain the reasoning why Infamous Ironman is considered better than Nimrod?
Amanda_Cruze
Member Posts: 67 ★
I am watching famous youtubers mentioning this in their chats that Infamous is better than Nimrod.
I fought against Red Mag, Nimrod is better.
I fought against Vision Aarkus/Venom/King Groot/ sersi, Nimrod is better.
I mean granted that Infamous has good utilities and the best prestige but I dont understand why they put Nimrod below infamous Ironman.
In fact Nimrod doesn't even need his sig ability to be good!
And please be polite! Thanks
Post edited by Kabam Porthos on
0
Comments
Secondly, every single match-up you just mentioned is bad for IDoom so ofc Nimrod is gonna perform better in those. Red Mags will screw up his ability accuracy, Vision Aarkus will remove his armor so he won't have access to his utility, Venom is immune to power burn against tech champs and King Groot is naturally immune to power burn, Sersi reduces shock duration by up to 90% so it will be very difficult to regularly activate IDoom's aura.
Finally, he doesn't need his sig to be good either. That's just innacurate.
Took him to R2. I already had iDoom as 5* R5 (sig40)
I personally find nimrod to be better
I will say that your Red Mag comparison is a little lopsided, since Nimrod negates the AAR from magnetism.
All of those cosmics are very different.
Try infamous against Bishop compared to Nimrod.
Many of the YouTubers do care about prestige, which Infamous is #1.
It also seems like Infamous has a pretty specific rotation compared to Nimrod's very easy one (which I love).
If I get an infamous, he will go to R4 and join my Nimrod there.
Youtubers are sipping that kool Aid.
only thing going for him is that absurd prestige.