Nick fury in BG

blackdragonightblackdragonight Member Posts: 114 ★★
edited May 2023 in General Discussion
Nick fury is bugged second life mine is r4 200 sig he's suppose to tick 500 but instead he's ticking down 2000 big difference please fix this I saw in a youtuber video on his side
Post edited by Kabam Jax on

Comments

  • blackdragonightblackdragonight Member Posts: 114 ★★
    Battlegrounds doesn't have health modifiers the hp always been the same
    Maratox said:

    So you saw your nick fury as a defender in a YouTube video? If that’s the case then nick’s health he loses is percentage based and changes with health modifiers like the ones battlegrounds defenders get

  • blackdragonightblackdragonight Member Posts: 114 ★★
    By your logic Nick fury would be a better defender as a r3 than r4
  • FerahgoFerahgo Member Posts: 97
    300% health multiplier for defenders. And no his logic doesn't mean hes better at r3 because he would die at exactly the same percentage per tick and not take hits as well


  • TyphoonTyphoon Member Posts: 1,847 ★★★★★
    Had you also not hit the defender in 6 seconds?
  • CyborgNinja135CyborgNinja135 Member Posts: 1,120 ★★★★

    By your logic Nick fury would be a better defender as a r3 than r4

    You should check your logic again. A r4 will always have more health than a r3, modifiers or not
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Member Posts: 5,151 ★★★★★
    Ferahgo said:

    300% health multiplier for defenders. And no his logic doesn't mean hes better at r3 because he would die at exactly the same percentage per tick and not take hits as well


    OP been silenced. No more replies.
  • blackdragonightblackdragonight Member Posts: 114 ★★
    Forum is more slow than my global
  • pseudosanepseudosane Member, Guardian Posts: 3,978 Guardian
    Ferahgo said:

    300% health multiplier for defenders. And no his logic doesn't mean hes better at r3 because he would die at exactly the same percentage per tick and not take hits as well


    +300% health... his own health +300%=??? 400%. you have your answer.
This discussion has been closed.