**KNOWN AW ISSUE**
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Options
Comments
Whenever there is a pain point for players there is always a million thread about it. That's just how things work. People don't like something, people complain about it. I'm no different.
Your most accurate sentence in your response to me is "The probability of this happening is so low that something seems amiss." That (pardon the poor choice of wording), is a distinct possibility.
a) what you said is correct
b) it’s mostly useless.
What people are asking is not if it’s possible or probably but just a clarification of what decides who gets to place first since it doesn’t seem so random. Until this is clarified from an official source, everyone is just shooting in the dark with a distinct possibility but an extremely low probability of hitting the bullseye.
The game I currently play that I don't 99.99% of you have ever heard of has it it pretty bad, and we've been kicking around an idea similar to "name that tune" where you would say at "find a match" put in a number of points you would be willing to pay to be able to draft 2nd / place defender 2nd in first / third round.
If I were to spend say 55000 points... then well I guess I am forfeiting / probably not a good idea.
If you said 1000 points, and I said 2000 points, then I would "give you 2000 points" in round 1, and I would have bought the right to go first.
anyway anyone who "really wants that" can bid high, anyone who doesn't care can bid low... and for "tie breaker"... it can go back tot he supposed RNG.
Entering the number would be done before entering a match, and the "winner" of the big can be displayed in the initial count down saying "you two matched" and in the ban phase... so no time would be wasted.
No whether that big applied to Round 1, round 3, all rounds... there are some options here for Kabam to pick from, or maybe they twist this up a little bit... but I think the "silent bid" approach would make it fair... and if you weren't liking the results, you could change your bid after the match, just like how you could change your deck or anything else.
Don't believe me? I matched 2 of my accounts on 2 different devices. The one that triggered the match was the one that went first.
Here's a pic
Pretty obvious if you try.
All we are asking for is a clarification or an explanation for the disadvantage that we have been saddled with. If it is just luck, let the devs say so. Until then there is no reason to believe it is so. I am not assuming ill intention behind this, but incompetence is definitely more likely than serendipity.
you can't time it coz you are trying to find matches blindly