Since my idea last time is hated by the community
713_o_f1673r
Member Posts: 440 ★★
I'm going to suggest two ways for the summoner's choice voting to matter that will be even less impactful for the game (which I believe is where the hate stemmed from) and I’m going to ask the community itself their own suggestions.
1. Give units to the people that voted for the winners. How I think this will work:
- 4 ballots for a single champ = 50 units
- 8 ballots = 100 units
- 12 ballots = 150 units
Any less and we won't get the units. We can't get 100 units for 5 ballots used, only 50.
2. Make the winner a great offensive and defensive counter to all the losers.
Anyway, what about you? What are your ideas?
1. Give units to the people that voted for the winners. How I think this will work:
- 4 ballots for a single champ = 50 units
- 8 ballots = 100 units
- 12 ballots = 150 units
Any less and we won't get the units. We can't get 100 units for 5 ballots used, only 50.
2. Make the winner a great offensive and defensive counter to all the losers.
Anyway, what about you? What are your ideas?
7
Comments
They would be laughing their a** out with the unit give away suggestion, and because this would bring them to a great mood, they would maybe consider revisiting the WoW Abs Man fight 😂
and this is the nicer response from Transformers The Movie that this brought to mind...
Your post suggests things both wild and a bit incendiary, directed at a touchy subject. It would take a lot of deftness to pull that off. Which to be direct, you do not possess.
The simplest way to prompt discussions is to ask questions, not make suggestions. For suggestions to be taken seriously you have to have a demonstrably competent command of the situation and the general pulse of the community. This takes time to learn.
If my suggestions seems like they're trying to start something then I assure you, it's not intentional.
“I'm going to suggest two ways for the summoner's choice voting to matter that will be even less impactful for the game (which I believe is where the hate stemmed from)”
Now you’re claiming you have no idea that the Summoners Choice voting is controversial?
I don’t think I’m qualified to help you. Educational psychology is not one of my areas of competency.
But UNITS (or potions, etc,) would seem way too much, and would invite much more fraud somehow. (Spinning up hundreds of accounts just to “stuff the ballot box” with the way your main account has voted).
But something like a TITLE, or custom PROFILE PIC, would be interesting.
Like a Profile Pic of the actual Winning champ holding up a “I WON” sign. (similar, but opposite, of “Dewey Defeats Truman”)
Would be based only on First Round (when all 8 were in ballot), and would be based on whichever champ you put majority of your 1st round votes toward (so 4 - 0, or 3 - 1).
A profile pic is interesting! It definitely is already better than my 1 because it isn't something that'll cause democracy issues. Though I'm curious why is it only based on the 1st round? Also, thanks for sharing your own idea. You're the 1st one to do so.
My other comment didn't show up for some reasons.
Title or Profile Pic based on if you voted for ultimate winner from during the 1st round only…
My suggestion base it on 1st Round only, because that is when the field was wide-open. Not after 2 failed rounds of voting for loser, then you happened to get it right with winner only against 1 other opponent.
Also, even though not worth as much as Units, I can still see some ppl voting based on how they think others will too (who might be most popular), and NOT who THEY would really want to see win. So if they did this in 1st Round, they could still vote their “unpopular” preference in later rounds.
Yes, would probably have guaranteed even moreso that Blob would make it past 1st round, but then next 2 rounds would be for who people really wanted instead of who you thought others would want.
——
And your original #2. Make Winner a great counter against all the Losers…
No.
It would be maybe a year before ANY of the others eventually got in. And most of the losers might NEVER get into game.
So making Winner be a counter against champs who would be a long ways off (if ever), shouldn’t come into play with designing the Winner to begin with.
Yes, what people said will highly likely win will now voted by almost everyone because of the reward.
Why not? The losers can still be great, just countered by the winner. This will also be a good way to exercise keeping relevancy to past champs in general, because the winner is a past champ that they have to keep in mind when making the losers.