X-Magica attacker tactic

JayPaf

I don’t know if I am the only one or it is because english isn’t my first language but the description feels like it is missing some words. In this sentence I feel like it is just not grammatically correct.

“ When a #Magic Thief Defender activates an Indestructible Passive, it and 1 Prowess Passive from this Tactic is instantly removed. “

This “ it and 1 Prowess Passive from this Tactic is instantly removed.“

I know what they mean by it, that if defender activates indestructible it then removes one prowess to remove the indestructible but in that sentence it just says “ it and “ which I can’t wrap my head around lmao

mmartin5817

It is a confusing sentence. The “it” I assume is referring to the indestructible. They make things so wordy. Essentially if you use a x- magica attacker you can ignore this node on magic theif champs.

JayPaf

mmartin5817 said:

It is a confusing sentence. The “it” I assume is referring to the indestructible. They make things so wordy. Essentially if you use a x- magica attacker you can ignore this node on magic theif champs.

Well I mean I got that part about the tactic. I am just pointing out it looks odd to me. If it was something like

When a #Magic Thief Defender activates an Indestructible Passive, it THEN REMOVES 1 Prowess Passive from Tactic ATTACKER TO INSTANTLY REMOVE THAT INDESTRUCTIBLE.

Would make much more sense to me…

Deder80

The wording and sentence are correct. They wrote it funny but correct. Honestly, they could have explained it in a more simplified way.

Wakandas_Finest

Doesn’t matter since the attack tactic isn’t working as intended. When the defender activates an indestructible it does not remove a prowess or an indestructible passive. Currently the only way to remove a passive is with a well timed block which oddly enough isn’t always a parry even though it should be.