What sig is your AA at?

Polygon

One of the most controversial champions out there when it comes to his sig. it’s been argued that the sig 112 is a myth and low sig is fine.

The truth is that sig 20 is fine for most applications (need 4 neuros instead of 3) but there are a few fights where sig 112 would be preferred like FAM, ibom, bishop, doom etc.

I’m currently picking out my hairs on whether I should feed him my sigs though because he’s a rank 5 and I fear that the higher the sigs might make him more likely to flash on ones radar to ban him. (I’m going to ascend him which is only going to make matters worse)


Also if he’s at max sig, can you please comment what rank hes at and if he gets banned or not in BGs?

Kingering_King

0

Polygon

@o_o @BeastDad @SirGamesBond @willrun4adonut

If you dont mind me asking what rank hes at and if he gets banned often assuming its at rank 6?

Oakenshield

200

R5 as of three weeks ago, ascended as of last week. No bans yet, but the season just started.

klobberintyme

200

Max sig meant for me he can stay at r4, however with the free 4-5 gem i may revisit. 2 neuros gets the job done mostly with max sig.

I don't touch bgs but if i did I'd wait for the opponent to ban him.

FrostGiantLord

20

I don't have a 6* yet, but my 5* is maxed, ascended, and is sitting at sig 50. He's pretty low on my BGs roster so doesn't get banned very often, and it's basically game over if I pit him against any champ with no immunities.

willrun4adonut

200

Polygon said:

@o_o @BeastDad @SirGamesBond @willrun4adonut

If you dont mind me asking what rank hes at and if he gets banned often assuming its at rank 6?

Mine is sig 182, r4 ascended. He's never banned. I'll be bringing him to r5 when I have the catalysts.

I honestly don't see him getting banned. People seem to ban my maestro, photon and others before they even touch AA. I think it's because most of them have him in their deck already.

But if I could, I would have him at sig 20 for BG as he'd appear lower and they might not see him.

NoirSoirée

200

mine is sig 200, R5 ascended and gets banned 1/10 of the times... usually gets banned by the types of players that ban nuke champs (so my Torch and Scorp/Hulk) also get banned in those matches

SirGamesBond

200

He stayed at sig 40 for content.
After BGs were introduced, i took him 112.
And slowly he got to 200.
R5a in January.
He gets a ban here n there not much.

PT_99

200

Gonna r5 ascend as well

BeastDad

200

Polygon said:

@o_o @BeastDad @SirGamesBond @willrun4adonut

If you dont mind me asking what rank hes at and if he gets banned often assuming its at rank 6?

Sig 200, never been banned once.

captain_rogers

20

@klobberintyme does the sig scale based on rarity? I think lower rarity archangel (4* and 5") have 33% aar for each neurotoxin at max sig. But it seems like archangel can get 40% aar as a 6* max sig.

captain_rogers

20

Mine is r4a and got him recently. What is the sweet spot for his sig?

Wu_Bangerz23

112

Not EXACTLY 112 BUT like 117-120 and I've NEVER had a need for more

Rayven5220

112

R4A 112. Gets banned here and there, but not that often.

Jack2634

200

i used to lock him at 112-113 for a long time. Nowadays when 6 star sig stone is easier to get, i bumped him to 200, cuz that is my treatment rules for the 6r5 gang

Greekhit

200

He is r5, ascended and sig200.
He was my first Mutant r5 and my 3rd r5 only after Doom and Hercules.
He used to get banned a lot back when I had few r5s and no 7*r3s, but now between 7r3s and over 15 r5s on deck, most of which ascended and being big nukes like Torch or Titania, AA is hardly noticed and gets banned by players.

JT_Supreme

200

200 cuz I can’t do the math

captain_rogers

20

Actually understand this, Archangel won't get banned most of the times cuz the opponent needs him as well. Archangel is very useful in lots of matchups. Up until recently i used my 5* ascended archangel in my deck, and I never banned opponent's archangel even if it's 6* r5, cuz I needed him that desperately for most matchups.

AcidBurn404

0