Why can't the BG model be fairer?

Since the introduction of this BG mode, I have been very curious, why does the competitive mode not have a more fair environment.

Sure, this game needs some players who pay to win, but they already have an advantage in AW and AQ. The BG model is a competitive model, why can't it have fairer conditions?

For example, limit the heroes to the same level, such as 6R4, of course, you have not upgraded to, still need to upgrade. Wouldn't that be fairer?

Now the competitive environment of BG is that as soon as the opponent is overwhelmed by the level, there will be fear. As a result, fewer and fewer FTP players are playing this mode

Comments

PT_99

Is it
BATTLE grounds
or
FAIR grounds.

Do tell. Yall should be glad that there's fair fight policy till platinum. Everyone Getting bronze silver gold rewards is good thing, so if players want more rewards then they must have skills and ranked up heroes to BATTLE for those rewards.

Plus, gahh, 6* is OLD NEWS (some exceptios are there) So get on with time and get those 7* big boy champs.

Cure2024

If they lock the champs to R4 then BG will be useless for Kabam. You should understand that Kabam money with rankups. If whale are locked at R4 then why would they spend money on deals to rankup their champs?

Why do you think they keep switching metas? it is to force everyone to keep ranking up champs. That's how they milk the whales.

xLunatiXx

If you agree to cut your rewards by half then ok you can face accounts of your size

Ashacekar

Is it dark in complexion?

Dab_west

bro would probably still lose even if everyone had to only use 6r4 champs

laserjohn26

You can limit the champs however you see fit. The same people are still going to win.

Rayven5220

bro would probably still lose even if everyone had to only use 6r4 champs

"Omg, they all have the newest champs at r4!!!", I can hear it now. Haha

Kasnow1

Since the introduction of this BG mode, I have been very curious, why does the competitive mode not have a more fair environment.

Sure, this game needs some players who pay to win, but they already have an advantage in AW and AQ. The BG model is a competitive model, why can't it have fairer conditions?

For example, limit the heroes to the same level, such as 6R4, of course, you have not upgraded to, still need to upgrade. Wouldn't that be fairer?

Now the competitive environment of BG is that as soon as the opponent is overwhelmed by the level, there will be fear. As a result, fewer and fewer FTP players are playing this mode

Difficult to have a constructive exchange on this place. The privileged will always discredit you. I personally think bg became unpopular because it’s a frustrating and punishing mode. All have to change otherwise it will die.

PT_99

Since the introduction of this BG mode, I have been very curious, why does the competitive mode not have a more fair environment.

Sure, this game needs some players who pay to win, but they already have an advantage in AW and AQ. The BG model is a competitive model, why can't it have fairer conditions?

For example, limit the heroes to the same level, such as 6R4, of course, you have not upgraded to, still need to upgrade. Wouldn't that be fairer?

Now the competitive environment of BG is that as soon as the opponent is overwhelmed by the level, there will be fear. As a result, fewer and fewer FTP players are playing this mode
Difficult to have a constructive exchange on this place. The privileged will always discredit you. I personally think bg became unpopular because it’s a frustrating and punishing mode. All have to change otherwise it will die.

I love my f2p THE Valiant privileges 😍

Kasnow1

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆

SaltE_Wenis69

Since the introduction of this BG mode, I have been very curious, why does the competitive mode not have a more fair environment.

Sure, this game needs some players who pay to win, but they already have an advantage in AW and AQ. The BG model is a competitive model, why can't it have fairer conditions?

For example, limit the heroes to the same level, such as 6R4, of course, you have not upgraded to, still need to upgrade. Wouldn't that be fairer?

Now the competitive environment of BG is that as soon as the opponent is overwhelmed by the level, there will be fear. As a result, fewer and fewer FTP players are playing this mode

quit whining, git gud, and progress content like everyone else,

Demonzfyre

I have been very curious, why does the competitive mode not have a more fair environment.

So you don't want a competitive mode to be....... competitive?

Demonzfyre

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆

Whats a "sherperd" dog and how does it apply in situation?

PT_99

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆
Whats a "sherperd" dog and how does it apply in situation?

Must be some new slang which makes no sense, again.

Jack2634

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆
Whats a "sherperd" dog and how does it apply in situation?

as a valiant and a former CoD enjoyer, i cant agree more. Shepherd is indeed, a dog

MrSakuragi

I have been very curious, why does the competitive mode not have a more fair environment.
So you don't want a competitive mode to be....... competitive?

Probably wants it to be competitive only up to the point where he can win, but not any more competitive than that.

Gercas

After he keeps loosing to rank 4s he will ask to keep champs sig 20

Pikolu

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆
Whats a "sherperd" dog and how does it apply in situation?
Must be some new slang which makes no sense, again.

Been moderating the new discord and dealing with all the kids slang there has aged me over 20 years now. Even then, I haven't heard anyone use "sherperd" dog yet.

Demonzfyre

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆
Whats a "sherperd" dog and how does it apply in situation?
Must be some new slang which makes no sense, again.
Been moderating the new discord and dealing with all the kids slang there has aged me over 20 years now. Even then, I haven't heard anyone use "sherperd" dog yet.

I'm assuming it's Shepherd but I have no idea in what context it's supposed to even be used.

PT_99

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆
Whats a "sherperd" dog and how does it apply in situation?
Must be some new slang which makes no sense, again.
Been moderating the new discord and dealing with all the kids slang there has aged me over 20 years now. Even then, I haven't heard anyone use "sherperd" dog yet.

No cap 😎, bussing 😋, fr fr 😲, skrrrt 🫨 NO YEET 😞, shboink 🤧

Pikolu

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆
Whats a "sherperd" dog and how does it apply in situation?
Must be some new slang which makes no sense, again.
Been moderating the new discord and dealing with all the kids slang there has aged me over 20 years now. Even then, I haven't heard anyone use "sherperd" dog yet.
No cap 😎, bussing 😋, fr fr 😲, skrrrt 🫨 NO YEET 😞, shboink 🤧

If that's your most recent slang then you'll feel really old there too.

klobberintyme

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆
Whats a "sherperd" dog and how does it apply in situation?
Must be some new slang which makes no sense, again.
Been moderating the new discord and dealing with all the kids slang there has aged me over 20 years now. Even then, I haven't heard anyone use "sherperd" dog yet.
No cap 😎, bussing 😋, fr fr 😲, skrrrt 🫨 NO YEET 😞, shboink 🤧
If that's your most recent slang then you'll feel really old there too.

Only in Ohio

captain_rogers

I’m a valiant player. I did all contents on this game. But I’m not a sherperd dog. If only 5% of players enjoy a mode it’s a failure. We need all progression levels . ( you can dislike but it’s an évidence) 😆
Whats a "sherperd" dog and how does it apply in situation?
Must be some new slang which makes no sense, again.
Been moderating the new discord and dealing with all the kids slang there has aged me over 20 years now. Even then, I haven't heard anyone use "sherperd" dog yet.
No cap 😎, bussing 😋, fr fr 😲, skrrrt 🫨 NO YEET 😞, shboink 🤧

Sigma, rizz, ohio, skibidi toilet, bro☠️, who asked?, Chad, 🗿

This izz the nue trend.

Avnish

Another crying baby who is complaining that bg isn't fair. Op wants everyone to play according to the roster what he is suggesting. WTH then what is point if making roster and progression in the game. You are taking about using 6*R4 then some other player will come to the forum and ask why it isn't limited with 5*. What a joke.

FYI I am FTP and became valient in January 1st week.

GroundedWisdom

People **** on others too much when they have an issue with the level of disparage between Rosters in BGs, and it's the equivalent of telling people to "Git gud.".
It's a competition. That's redundant. The Rewards are meant to be appropriate to the effort someone puts in. That's also redundant. The issue people are facing is the range of Rosters is too vast to throw everyone in the mix. That's not an unreasonable statement to make. We're all aware of that.
We don't have to shut down every Thread that people communicate that issue. They're going to keep making that point either way, unless there's some kind of solution. No one on the other side is going to say, "You know, you're right. I don't deserve a fair completion. I should feel lucky to be used as easy prey for your progress.".
Just saying.

GroundedWisdom

I'm not saying I have all the answers. I'm just saying if you look at the difference in Rosters from Plat and up and the limitations of the competition such as time, Nodes, increased Attack and Health....then there are bound to be people who have an issue with it.

laserjohn26

I'm not saying I have all the answers. I'm just saying if you look at the difference in Rosters from Plat and up and the limitations of the competition such as time, Nodes, increased Attack and Health....then there are bound to be people who have an issue with it.

I agree. To this day, I swear my high school football team would have won the super bowl over the Chiefs in a fair game. The just had a better roster but we were 100% better and only lost because of unfair matchmaking.

Guest120193746239

If you agree to cut your rewards by half then ok you can face accounts of your size

You act like the rewards (solo) are worth it to begin with🤣.

BringPopcorn

People **** on others too much when they have an issue with the level of disparage between Rosters in BGs, and it's the equivalent of telling people to "Git gud.".
It's a competition. That's redundant. The Rewards are meant to be appropriate to the effort someone puts in. That's also redundant. The issue people are facing is the range of Rosters is too vast to throw everyone in the mix. That's not an unreasonable statement to make. We're all aware of that.
We don't have to shut down every Thread that people communicate that issue. They're going to keep making that point either way, unless there's some kind of solution. No one on the other side is going to say, "You know, you're right. I don't deserve a fair completion. I should feel lucky to be used as easy prey for your progress.".
Just saying.

The problem starts when people propose changes with parameters that only benefits them.
Sure OP said why cant roster be capped at R4.. why not R3 will say a TB later... Then will come a Cav saying why not R1...

GroundedWisdom

I'm not saying I have all the answers. I'm just saying if you look at the difference in Rosters from Plat and up and the limitations of the competition such as time, Nodes, increased Attack and Health....then there are bound to be people who have an issue with it.
I agree. To this day, I swear my high school football team would have won the super bowl over the Chiefs in a fair game. The just had a better roster but we were 100% better and only lost because of unfair matchmaking.

They don't get put in a Superbowl game, then told to suck it up.