Battlegrounds need some changes

In my opinion only 2 thing need to change in battle ground
1. IF enter battleground with 5 star champ all champs r 5 star, if u enter with 6 star all r 6 star. same for 7 start
2. chose any champ which one u have but when u enter all champs r automatically rich same level , for u and your opponent

its painfull for a freetoplaer when Some time i enter with my 6 start r4 champs and my opponent come with 6star max+ascension or 7 stars r3

Comments

LukeParry

Matty_Ice

This might be one of the worst ideas I’ve heard.

Gamer

This might be one of the worst ideas I’ve heard.

I didn’t understand the ide

Josh2507

This might be one of the worst ideas I’ve heard.
I didn’t understand the ide

Basically he wants all champs to be treated as if they were max level, regardless of his personal roster

Nightheart

_Kurumi_

No, terrible idea.

shield311

"some changes"

proceeds to list out the changes which would completely decimate the point of the gamemode

Mic-El

Hey there, bub! While I respect your opinion like I respect chimichangas, gotta say, making everyone's champs the same level sounds about as fun as a trip to the DMV. Where's the thrill in that? Half the fun is strategizing with what you've got, even if it means facing off against someone with a bigger, shinier toy. Besides, variety is the spice of life, and in this case, the spice of battles! So, let's keep things spicy and leave the equalizer at home, shall we?

Battle_arm

Why not??? why this is a bad idea???
i enter the match as a attacker with 6 star r3 domino agents 7star r3 killmonger
and opponent use as a attacker with 7 star r3 domino agents 6star r3 killmonger

this is a ok???? opponent have advantage both time as a attacker and also diffender. because he pay for this and im f2p.

Battle_arm

What happen when enter different type champs but they all convert to this -
7 star r3 killmonger convert to 7 star r1
6 star r3 domino same 6 star r3
both r look same difficulty level

Battle_arm

Maybe i unable to explain what i want to say. but maybe some members r understand

Mic-El

Hey there, buddy! I hear ya loud and clear. It sucks when you feel like you're bringing a butter knife to a bazooka fight, I get it. But here's the thing, life ain't always fair, especially in the Battlerealm. But that's what makes it exciting!

GrO_ot78

If you are TB or lower, forget BG.
Focus on becoming Paragon, HQ, EQ, SQ, Necro etc…fill your deck with R5s and 7R2+…

When you can no longer be banned from winning, you have a chance, and then BG starts to be fun.

SirGamesBond

Hey there, pal! You are allowed to feel what you feel towards a game mode. But companies and not run by feelings.
The people who say they want equal progression have to put same efforts or money to get their. Things are not free in life.

xLunatiXx

Using ftp as an excuse is a disgrace. I'm ftp myself and don't want any of your proposals.
What you're describing is an entire new game. MCOC, unlike a MOBA where you have access to all champs for example, is based on skill AND roster development.
What you're proposing is like a sandbox mode when only skill would be at play.
I'm not against that idea but that's not what MCOC is about. And it would make pointless every other aspect of the game.

It's nice to have ideas, but try to apply critical thinking and push your ideas to their limits and what they really imply in the long term and wide areas of this game.

Fryday

Hi @Battle_arm ,

I understand what you are trying to explain and achieve, essentially you want to be fight players at the similar roster strength to you, where the outcome of the match is based on the players skill.

I'm no whale (not even a sea bass 🤣), and get my fair share of matching up again double account side players, sure it is definitely doesn't feel nice.

However, like @SirGamesBond , for any suggestions to work, we also have to look at it in Kabam point of view too, I believe that all players are important, FTP, Small Spender and Largr Whale, all so important to the MCOC eco systems.

BG bring competitive mode to single player (not Alliance), it encourages/forces players to invest into champs chasing and rank up resources, which help generate income, cash flow and hopefully profits. No profit, no game for anyone.

Your suggestion would completely turn off all of the reasons above that would generate income for Kabam, hence why I wouldn't imagine it would work.

On the other perpective, while this is a competitive mode, I believe that the more participation the better, we all been these waiting ages to find a match or really struggles to get into GC because no one bother playing and 6 - 8mil accounts still in VT in the last day.

If BG is an environment where Uncollected, Cav and even Thronebreaker shouldn't bother then I think it is a big miss, it would be more health for the mode for all of these players to be encouraged to participate.

Personally, I would think, something along this line would be a good balance.

Change Token to Point, so 1 Token = 10 Points.

Win a match = get 10 points
Lose a match = get 2 points.

This will make no difference to big/high skilled players, you win 3 matches you more up a ranking (5 matches for Vibranium)

But for smaller/newer players they can still progress, sure it is a big grind, but it is not impossible. They put in the hard work in a different way. If something seem possible people will try, if something seem impossible they will stop before evening trying.

In this way BG can still be the same of Veteran players, while at the same time encouraging small/new players to join, invest their time and/or money in doing so.

Overall a healthier environment for the BG mode.

Mixtapevol02

Why not??? why this is a bad idea???
i enter the match as a attacker with 6 star r3 domino agents 7star r3 killmonger
and opponent use as a attacker with 7 star r3 domino agents 6star r3 killmonger

this is a ok???? opponent have advantage both time as a attacker and also diffender. because he pay for this and im f2p.

Can you stop dishing the f2p card, it’s starting to make us look bad.

And as for your idea, there is already a mode for that already. It is called ARENAS. You should be able to win 95% of the matches there.

PT_99

Oh hell nah 💀

Kabam, I know you guys are also fed up with these posts.
Just introduce some scuffed BG mode for low level players with low nerfed rewards already, sort them out.

Demonzfyre

What happen when enter different type champs but they all convert to this -
7 star r3 killmonger convert to 7 star r1
6 star r3 domino same 6 star r3
both r look same difficulty level

Because that's not how competitions work.

Armageddøn

It's a competitive mode, what else do you expect? Want those juicy rewards at the top?. Either be patient and work hard on your roster which takes years or spend money to progress quickly. There's no in between. That's how a competitive game mode works. If every other match you are finding an account twice or thrice your rating then it's a sign that you need to step away and play other game modes and work on your roster first before trying to get into bigger leagues or Glad. circuit. You don't need to push your limits and try to get into vibranium. You'll get there buddy just be patient.
Whatever idea you're suggesting fails the whole purpose of Battlegrounds.

Rayven5220

Welcome to platinum+ in bgs.
If you can't make it past there, you've hit your limit.
Focus on ranking champs, rather than coming up with ideas to change a system that won't change.

Matty_Ice

What would the point be of ranking champs? If any rank champ is already going to be the max, then there’s no point in ranking champs. If there’s no point in ranking champs, then there’s no point in chasing cats. There would be no more deciding who to rank up or not. If all this is void, we are left with a pretty boring game that people wouldn’t want to play.

Bigfoot33

Why not??? why this is a bad idea???
i enter the match as a attacker with 6 star r3 domino agents 7star r3 killmonger
and opponent use as a attacker with 7 star r3 domino agents 6star r3 killmonger

this is a ok???? opponent have advantage both time as a attacker and also diffender. because he pay for this and im f2p.

How do you know he paid? And how their roster got to that point is irrelevant. Either they worked hard as low spend/FTP or paid for it. You have reached the peak of your roster, do some content and improve your roster. Please stop trying to lower the bar so we can get participation trophies.

unknown

This content has been removed.

DNA3000

Hi @Battle_arm ,

I understand what you are trying to explain and achieve, essentially you want to be fight players at the similar roster strength to you, where the outcome of the match is based on the players skill.

I'm no whale (not even a sea bass 🤣), and get my fair share of matching up again double account side players, sure it is definitely doesn't feel nice.

However, like @SirGamesBond , for any suggestions to work, we also have to look at it in Kabam point of view too, I believe that all players are important, FTP, Small Spender and Largr Whale, all so important to the MCOC eco systems.

BG bring competitive mode to single player (not Alliance), it encourages/forces players to invest into champs chasing and rank up resources, which help generate income, cash flow and hopefully profits. No profit, no game for anyone.

Your suggestion would completely turn off all of the reasons above that would generate income for Kabam, hence why I wouldn't imagine it would work.

On the other perpective, while this is a competitive mode, I believe that the more participation the better, we all been these waiting ages to find a match or really struggles to get into GC because no one bother playing and 6 - 8mil accounts still in VT in the last day.

If BG is an environment where Uncollected, Cav and even Thronebreaker shouldn't bother then I think it is a big miss, it would be more health for the mode for all of these players to be encouraged to participate.

Personally, I would think, something along this line would be a good balance.

Change Token to Point, so 1 Token = 10 Points.

Win a match = get 10 points
Lose a match = get 2 points.

This will make no difference to big/high skilled players, you win 3 matches you more up a ranking (5 matches for Vibranium)

But for smaller/newer players they can still progress, sure it is a big grind, but it is not impossible. They put in the hard work in a different way. If something seem possible people will try, if something seem impossible they will stop before evening trying.

In this way BG can still be the same of Veteran players, while at the same time encouraging small/new players to join, invest their time and/or money in doing so.

Overall a healthier environment for the BG mode.

That would also be horrible, because in that system a player can simply put the phone down and idle their way to GC.

What you are characterizing as a "big grind" but "not impossible" would actually be, from many players' perspectives, completely trivial. Any suggestion in which any player with any roster of any kind can get GC rewards without playing, much less winning any BG matches, if they are just willing to burn enough energy, is dead on arrival, unless you want to completely eliminate the competitive element from the game mode and just make it into a different kind of arena.

startropics

we need to stop treating f2p players as sacred people whose well-wishes keep the game alive. they don't.

Dab_west

me when i invalidate all spending in the game because i cant get good

BringPopcorn

we need to stop treating f2p players as sacred people whose well-wishes keep the game alive. they don't.

We don't treat em as sacred people, that's the perception they have on their own.

phillgreen

Im not sure i understand but i guess its about equally rating both decks and ignoring their actual rating? If this idea were remotely viable I wouldn't ever need to rank a defender and only rank attackers I use all the time for non bg content

Plus, I wouldn't need to bother with difficult content to rank champs to a level that offsets my scrubby game play in bg's