The separate wording is confusing here, for sure.The Sig Stones were always intended to be Deathless throughout the content.I'll poke this again to make sure, but it's looking like it's an unfortunate wording error - apologies about that. We're kinda past "unfortunate error" anymore. The success rate of bugged content and failed communications is around 90% right now. It's careless. I can assure you, it's nowhere even close to 90% - this game is absolutely enormous.Unfortunately, accidents are going to happen - especially wording errors in comms when items can be referred to in multiple names.Our standard is still for there to be no errors throughout the game, and for nothing to go wrong. Please just stop any misleading wordplay. It is not just a matter of wording errors. What's the f point you guys need to use two different "terms" to describe one item? We all know what the f the deathless sig stone looks like because the name of that item is DEATHLESS SIG STONE. I'll happily shed some light here, if you're interested.Saga Signature Stones are present in each Saga - under the Saga Sig Stone bucket lies multiple different variations of Saga Signature Stones... one of them being: Deathless Saga Sig Stones.The folks tuning the events aren't the same people writing the Comms, due to this, wording occasionally gets crossed. Nothing done here is "intentionally" misleading.
The separate wording is confusing here, for sure.The Sig Stones were always intended to be Deathless throughout the content.I'll poke this again to make sure, but it's looking like it's an unfortunate wording error - apologies about that. We're kinda past "unfortunate error" anymore. The success rate of bugged content and failed communications is around 90% right now. It's careless. I can assure you, it's nowhere even close to 90% - this game is absolutely enormous.Unfortunately, accidents are going to happen - especially wording errors in comms when items can be referred to in multiple names.Our standard is still for there to be no errors throughout the game, and for nothing to go wrong. Please just stop any misleading wordplay. It is not just a matter of wording errors. What's the f point you guys need to use two different "terms" to describe one item? We all know what the f the deathless sig stone looks like because the name of that item is DEATHLESS SIG STONE.
The separate wording is confusing here, for sure.The Sig Stones were always intended to be Deathless throughout the content.I'll poke this again to make sure, but it's looking like it's an unfortunate wording error - apologies about that. We're kinda past "unfortunate error" anymore. The success rate of bugged content and failed communications is around 90% right now. It's careless. I can assure you, it's nowhere even close to 90% - this game is absolutely enormous.Unfortunately, accidents are going to happen - especially wording errors in comms when items can be referred to in multiple names.Our standard is still for there to be no errors throughout the game, and for nothing to go wrong.
The separate wording is confusing here, for sure.The Sig Stones were always intended to be Deathless throughout the content.I'll poke this again to make sure, but it's looking like it's an unfortunate wording error - apologies about that. We're kinda past "unfortunate error" anymore. The success rate of bugged content and failed communications is around 90% right now. It's careless.
The separate wording is confusing here, for sure.The Sig Stones were always intended to be Deathless throughout the content.I'll poke this again to make sure, but it's looking like it's an unfortunate wording error - apologies about that.
1. Sorry for the Confusion2. Here are 10 sigs in the mailbox. 3. Done
@Shock29 @TotemCorruption you both get a gold star for this respectful interaction.
There is one extremely simple fix for this issue: 1 on 1 converter of deathless sigs to saga sigs. Easy as peasy and the lemon squeezy.
so even tho lets say the deathless sig stone were meant to be a part of the incursions, so that means this is the first saga where there are no saga sig stone ( by that i mean the ones that can be used for all saga champs not only 5)right?
There is one extremely simple fix for this issue: 1 on 1 converter of deathless sigs to saga sigs. Easy as peasy and the lemon squeezy. Except then people who already used them would complain that they didn't get that chance, plus the people who have the 100+ deathless sig stones from other sources.
There is one extremely simple fix for this issue: 1 on 1 converter of deathless sigs to saga sigs. Easy as peasy and the lemon squeezy. Except then people who already used them would complain that they didn't get that chance, plus the people who have the 100+ deathless sig stones from other sources. If people already used them, then they had use for it. There are several player, who already have their deathless champs on max sig. For them 2 reward from this month is already useless.
There is one extremely simple fix for this issue: 1 on 1 converter of deathless sigs to saga sigs. Easy as peasy and the lemon squeezy. Except then people who already used them would complain that they didn't get that chance, plus the people who have the 100+ deathless sig stones from other sources. If people already used them, then they had use for it. There are several player, who already have their deathless champs on max sig. For them 2 reward from this month is already useless. That is completely wrong. For you to have all your deathless champs at max sig, you would have had buy every saga daily offer from multiple tiers since the saga stones were put in the daily store specials. If you have done all of the content in game without buying multiple daily offers (keeping in mind you'd have to be buying not just the valiant, but power tiers which would mean you're buying the offers solely for the +1 saga stone for $5), you would only have one max sig champ (unless you're also using generic or class 7* sig stones). For example, I've already used mine and only Thanos is max sig. There was no purpose to hold onto them as there was no purpose hold onto them.
There is one extremely simple fix for this issue: 1 on 1 converter of deathless sigs to saga sigs. Easy as peasy and the lemon squeezy. Except then people who already used them would complain that they didn't get that chance, plus the people who have the 100+ deathless sig stones from other sources. If people already used them, then they had use for it. There are several player, who already have their deathless champs on max sig. For them 2 reward from this month is already useless. That is completely wrong. For you to have all your deathless champs at max sig, you would have had buy every saga daily offer from multiple tiers since the saga stones were put in the daily store specials. If you have done all of the content in game without buying multiple daily offers (keeping in mind you'd have to be buying not just the valiant, but power tiers which would mean you're buying the offers solely for the +1 saga stone for $5), you would only have one max sig champ (unless you're also using generic or class 7* sig stones). For example, I've already used mine and only Thanos is max sig. There was no purpose to hold onto them as there was no purpose hold onto them. Even so, there are still so many limiting factors. What if someone didn't have the time to chase the deathless champs, or just simply didn't have the incentive. Or couldn't do the challenge to dupe them. Or just plain and simple, have no need for sigging up those champs they wouldn't use.If it was "Deathless incursions" where you only could use your deathless champs, I would be OK with the deathless sigs. But it's not, it's "Deathless SAGA incursions". the glorious games incursion sig stones wasn't limited to just the glorious guardians, it was saga stones. Arcade games too.Why change/nerf now?
The separate wording is confusing here, for sure.The Sig Stones were always intended to be Deathless throughout the content.I'll poke this again to make sure, but it's looking like it's an unfortunate wording error - apologies about that. We're kinda past "unfortunate error" anymore. The success rate of bugged content and failed communications is around 90% right now. It's careless. I can assure you, it's nowhere even close to 90% - this game is absolutely enormous.Unfortunately, accidents are going to happen - especially wording errors in comms when items can be referred to in multiple names.Our standard is still for there to be no errors throughout the game, and for nothing to go wrong. Please just stop any misleading wordplay. It is not just a matter of wording errors. What's the f point you guys need to use two different "terms" to describe one item? We all know what the f the deathless sig stone looks like because the name of that item is DEATHLESS SIG STONE. I'll happily shed some light here, if you're interested.Saga Signature Stones are present in each Saga - under the Saga Sig Stone bucket lies multiple different variations of Saga Signature Stones... one of them being: Deathless Saga Sig Stones.The folks tuning the events aren't the same people writing the Comms, due to this, wording occasionally gets crossed. Nothing done here is "intentionally" misleading. This is helpful to understand how the team sees it. Couple of questions:As far as I can remember, this particular construct of a saga with subsets of stones has not existed. Is that right?For the deathless saga, you seem to be implying that Deathless stones are one type of saga sig stone and that there could be more “subsets” that are focused on champs other than the Desthless. Is that right?