Options

NTW or Bishop to R3?

TP33TP33 Member Posts: 1,773 ★★★★★
Both are unduped, NTW is more of an attacker for me and bishop would be a defensive option, although I don’t run recoils so idk how good of a defender he would be these days.

Both are great this meta, I don’t play AW super hard right now but NTW would definitely let me take it more seriously.

Idk who’s better so I’d like to ask for opinions from the community

Comments

  • JackTheSnackJackTheSnack Member Posts: 2,152 ★★★★
    I personally like bishop bc he is a bit of a dual threat. Will def take mine to r2 and maybe r3 if I can dupe him
  • Super_Cretu90Super_Cretu90 Member Posts: 359 ★★
    I find Bishop way better, but i mostly rank up champions that I enjoy playing. It is a game and we need to enjoy it in our own way.
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 13,455 ★★★★★
    Bishop is definitely better
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Member Posts: 7,978 ★★★★★
    Biased opinion.
    I never liked bishop.
    The amount of parries it want me to do damage which relies on crits feels stupid for my playstyle.

    I r2ed bishop early just because he was the only option I had as runkup at one point. He is still r2 and with no relics. fungus has grown on him as he never sees the light of the day.
  • Joker1976Joker1976 Member Posts: 987 ★★★★
    I have both at R3,..NTW is heavily underrated and somewhat of a dual threat,..there is a lot of stuff negasonic can deal with and counter,..Bishop is excellent too.
  • SearmenisSearmenis Member Posts: 1,903 ★★★★★
    Think of it this way: You are going to dupe them both someday. NTW s dupe is way more meaningful than Bishop's.
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 11,110 ★★★★★
    Both are great skill killers but Bishop isn’t as reliant on DOT as much as Negasonic. Negasonic is the better Bullseye counter though
Sign In or Register to comment.