Options

So uh…what good is a vigilance passive going to do against this Mr. Fantastic boss?

JackTheSnackJackTheSnack Member Posts: 2,220 ★★★★
He evades like crazy despite it being “reduced by 75%”. Is this intended?

Comments

  • VanillaCokeVanillaCoke Member Posts: 1,578 ★★★★★
    Vigilance prevents miss, not evade. Is this intended? @KabamPinwheel @KabamDORK @Kabam (Osaurus) Rex
  • JackTheSnackJackTheSnack Member Posts: 2,220 ★★★★

    Vigilance prevents miss, not evade. Is this intended? @KabamPinwheel @KabamDORK @Kabam (Osaurus) Rex

    Yeah that’s what I was pointing out in the title. Wasn’t sure if they tried to combat the issue with a “75% evade reduction” and just didn’t give us pursuit passive or something…but he’s evading like crazy
  • MagrailothosMagrailothos Member Posts: 6,420 ★★★★★

    Vigilance prevents miss, not evade. Is this intended? @KabamPinwheel @KabamDORK @Kabam (Osaurus) Rex

    Yeah that’s what I was pointing out in the title. Wasn’t sure if they tried to combat the issue with a “75% evade reduction” and just didn’t give us pursuit passive or something…but he’s evading like crazy
    I wonder how they coded it?

    Mr Fantastic's Evade ability is (depending on your viewpoint) interestingly/weirdly resistant to accuracy reduction.

    Falcon's -100% AAR, for example, doesn't touch it.

    I'm no expert, but based on the fact that a lot of other weird interactions are explained by the order in which things happen, I suspect that this is because the -100% DAAR from Lock-on is applied to Reed's base chance to Evade (0%) and it doesn't appear to affect the additional 5% per debuff.

    It would be interesting if the -75% chance to Evade node place by Kabam to 'help' worked the same way...
  • Perfect_jabPerfect_jab Member Posts: 127 ★★
    5% in kabam defender math, means he will evade 95% of the time
Sign In or Register to comment.