SPIDER WOMAN NERF --- need an answer behalf of community
The recent nerf to Spider-Woman is deeply disappointing and highlights an ongoing inconsistency in your balance decisions.
Spider-Woman was not game-breaking. She required proper play, setup, and matchup knowledge to perform well. Nerfing her after players invested time, resources, and often money into ranking her up sends a clear message: free or easily accessible champions are expendable, while others are protected.
At the same time, champions like Dark Phoenix, who sits firmly behind a paid wall, remain untouched despite having far more impact and dominance in their intended content. This creates a very clear perception that monetization, not balance, determines which champions get adjusted.
Balance should be based on actual gameplay health, not on how a champion is obtained. When paid champions are shielded from nerfs while others are quickly adjusted, player trust erodes. Many players plan their rosters around the assumption that fair balance standards apply to all champions equally.
If Spider-Woman deserved a nerf, then the same standards must apply across the board — including to Dark Phoenix. Anything less feels selective and unfair.
If you really want to change something you should change the Defensive Power bar of Spider Woman from your side in your website .
Kabam needs to decide whether MCOC is a competitive, balanced game or a marketplace where balance stops at the paywall.
