Get a Free 3-6 Star Baron Zemo this Week!

Log in to the Summoner's Market at https://store.playcontestofchampions.com/ and claim the Baron Zemo Selector between 10am PT November 24 and 10am PT on December 1st.

Proven and Below: 3-Star
Conqueror/Uncollected: 4-Star
Cavalier/Thronebreaker: 5-Star
Paragon/Valiant: 6-Star

You can only claim this Baron Zemo one time. The Baron Zemo is delivered as a selector, claiming it will require you to choose your rarity immediately. If you plan to change your Progression level during the Cyber Week event, we suggest you wait until you have made that change before claiming this selector.

Kang Down, Why ?

black_hawk_47black_hawk_47 Posts: 4
edited January 2018 in Suggestions and Requests
Why kang has been downed since the last version ?
His sp1 is weaker than before he makes just 2,5 seconds of stun whereas he made 3,2~ before.
It s à rare heroe and you dawn him weaker than the most heries. This is (edited by mod), even some basic Heroes do more stun than him now, i demand you for me and aller thé people having kang , remake him as his precedent version, he was better.
Now, even a basic heroe can be stronger than him

Thanks for the comprehension.

Comments

  • black_hawk_47black_hawk_47 Posts: 4
    kang was very good with his sp1, now he is basic, even weaker than some basics heroes, and that's ****, he has been just nerfed, and hadn't any up to compense.
    Whereas i have him in 4* R4 awaked, now i don't know if it's better to r5 him or another heroe, he didn't hit very strong, but his stun allowed to compense that with more combos, but now, it doesn't allow hit, even with the mastery of stun more 0.5s
  • TonyStarkTonyStark Posts: 354 ★
    With the 3.2 secs sp1 stun, players were able to infinite stun their opponent which made Kang too over powerful.
    That's why kabam nerfed his stun from 3.2 secs to 2.5 secs.

    There are many champions who can do more stun than Kang. But there's no champ who did infinite stun like Kang.

    That was a stupid move by Kabam to give him 3.2 secs stun with 100% chance to proc.

    They nerfed him which is justified but they should've given him other buff to maintain the balance.But they only nerfed him, that's why they are Kabam.
  • TonyStarkTonyStark Posts: 354 ★
    edited January 2018
    black_hawk_47 wrote: »
    kang was very good with his sp1, now he is basic, even weaker than some basics heroes, and that's ****, he has been just nerfed, and hadn't any up to compense.
    Whereas i have him in 4* R4 awaked, now i don't know if it's better to r5 him or another heroe, he didn't hit very strong, but his stun allowed to compense that with more combos, but now, it doesn't allow hit, even with the mastery of stun more 0.5s

    Don't R5 Kang. There are many better Tech champs.
  • WildpantsWildpants Posts: 148
    TonyStark wrote: »
    With the 3.2 secs sp1 stun, players were able to infinite stun their opponent which made Kang too over powerful.
    That's why kabam nerfed his stun from 3.2 secs to 2.5 secs.

    There are many champions who can do more stun than Kang. But there's no champ who did infinite stun like Kang.

    That was a stupid move by Kabam to give him 3.2 secs stun with 100% chance to proc.

    They nerfed him which is justified but they should've given him other buff to maintain the balance.But they only nerfed him, that's why they are Kabam.

    He is a super rare champion. Bet you don't have him. If he's gonna be a that rare he's better be op.
Sign In or Register to comment.