Compensation for the Issues that we experienced on November 8th and the rewards that were unable to be claimed due to those issues are being sent out via in-game mail on November 15. Alliance War season rewards will be sent out on approximately November 20. Leaving your Alliance prior to this will result in missing out on your season rewards.

Hulk Ragnarok “Face Me” Ability Not Working Properly?

@Kabam Miike ay5rhi3kuq95.jpeg
bgahazyxogxf.jpeg

The amount of health gained back is inconsistent from fight to fight, and it varies from the 70% target stated in the abilities section.

Comments

  • NOOOOOOOOPEEEEENOOOOOOOOPEEEEE Posts: 2,079 ★★★★
    That is wierd.
  • i just wanted to report this also, I don't get Face me from bleed or most debuffs, sometimes i get it but it stays on for like a second or so and disappears again (even if the debuff is still on me)
  • Romissy wrote: »
    i just wanted to report this also, I don't get Face me from bleed or most debuffs, sometimes i get it but it stays on for like a second or so and disappears again (even if the debuff is still on me)

    It only applies to passive damage over time (Magik's Limbo, Dormammu's Degeneration, Mephisto's Aura, etc.).
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 20,482 ★★★★★
    Mine seemed to be working properly against Mordo.
  • I am so jealous!!! I want your hulk ragnarok so bad!!! UR so lucky... :'(
  • DHCVoLtDHCVoLt Posts: 266
    edited February 2018
    It’s 70% of the damage taken. If the damage is lower the regen will be lower
    Edit- I looked at the picture. It does look broken, great
  • kado313kado313 Posts: 37
    The damage value in the second image is correct, why was it included?
  • kado313 wrote: »
    The damage value in the second image is correct, why was it included?

    It's 80% when it should be 70%. Both images show a lack of consistency across fights, when there should be no difference.
  • kado313kado313 Posts: 37
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    The damage value in the second image is correct, why was it included?

    It's 80% when it should be 70%. Both images show a lack of consistency across fights, when there should be no difference.

    Its 80% with 3 points into recovery.
  • kado313 wrote: »
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    The damage value in the second image is correct, why was it included?

    It's 80% when it should be 70%. Both images show a lack of consistency across fights, when there should be no difference.

    Its 80% with 3 points into recovery.

    So why not in the first pic?
  • kado313kado313 Posts: 37
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    The damage value in the second image is correct, why was it included?

    It's 80% when it should be 70%. Both images show a lack of consistency across fights, when there should be no difference.

    Its 80% with 3 points into recovery.

    So why not in the first pic?

    In the first pic I believe the enemy is running despair. And the person who is play HR still has 3 points into recovery. My theory breaks though if limbo doesnt proc despair, but the math almost lines up perfectly.
  • kado313kado313 Posts: 37
    It could def be an issue, my main point was that the second image is simply the value from 3 points of recovery and has no place in this conversation.
  • kado313 wrote: »
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    The damage value in the second image is correct, why was it included?

    It's 80% when it should be 70%. Both images show a lack of consistency across fights, when there should be no difference.

    Its 80% with 3 points into recovery.

    So why not in the first pic?

    In the first pic I believe the enemy is running despair. And the person who is play HR still has 3 points into recovery. My theory breaks though if limbo doesnt proc despair, but the math almost lines up perfectly.

    Both players have despair. If Limbo triggers despair, then that is most certainly a bug, since Limbo is not a debuff.
  • kado313kado313 Posts: 37
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    The damage value in the second image is correct, why was it included?

    It's 80% when it should be 70%. Both images show a lack of consistency across fights, when there should be no difference.

    Its 80% with 3 points into recovery.

    So why not in the first pic?

    In the first pic I believe the enemy is running despair. And the person who is play HR still has 3 points into recovery. My theory breaks though if limbo doesnt proc despair, but the math almost lines up perfectly.

    Both players have despair. If Limbo triggers despair, then that is most certainly a bug, since Limbo is not a debuff.

    Exactly my thoughts.
  • kado313kado313 Posts: 37
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    MC1111111 wrote: »
    kado313 wrote: »
    The damage value in the second image is correct, why was it included?

    It's 80% when it should be 70%. Both images show a lack of consistency across fights, when there should be no difference.

    Its 80% with 3 points into recovery.

    So why not in the first pic?

    In the first pic I believe the enemy is running despair. And the person who is play HR still has 3 points into recovery. My theory breaks though if limbo doesnt proc despair, but the math almost lines up perfectly.

    Both players have despair. If Limbo triggers despair, then that is most certainly a bug, since Limbo is not a debuff.

    Lets be honest, would we have known before if limbo was procing despair lol. Hulk is out new tester.
  • BDLHBDLH Posts: 148
    limbo does not proc despair, this has long been known. theory wrong. Kabam's poor math skills are evident everywhere is much more likely than this theory. There are numerous pics of players leaving 1 path to complete all of act 5/4 and the numbers are 100 100 100 96% complete but the total average for complete act exploration is listed at 95% or lower. You can't average 4 higher numbers to get a lower one by any meaning of "average" (median, mode, alternate universe silly math, etc). They just can't do math is the most likely explanation.
  • kado313kado313 Posts: 37
    edited February 2018
    BDLH wrote: »
    limbo does not proc despair, this has long been known. theory wrong. Kabam's poor math skills are evident everywhere is much more likely than this theory. There are numerous pics of players leaving 1 path to complete all of act 5/4 and the numbers are 100 100 100 96% complete but the total average for complete act exploration is listed at 95% or lower. You can't average 4 higher numbers to get a lower one by any meaning of "average" (median, mode, alternate universe silly math, etc). They just can't do math is the most likely explanation.

    "limbo does not proc despair, this has long been known." All these new bugs appearing and you all of a sudden become the know it all on whats possible and not possible. My theory isnt just a theory, the math lines up. Just because you say "theory wrong" doesnt make you right.
  • kado313kado313 Posts: 37
    BDLH wrote: »
    limbo does not proc despair, this has long been known. theory wrong. Kabam's poor math skills are evident everywhere is much more likely than this theory. There are numerous pics of players leaving 1 path to complete all of act 5/4 and the numbers are 100 100 100 96% complete but the total average for complete act exploration is listed at 95% or lower. You can't average 4 higher numbers to get a lower one by any meaning of "average" (median, mode, alternate universe silly math, etc). They just can't do math is the most likely explanation.

    Also explain to me how anyone proved that limbo doesnt proc despair- other than by kabams word of it. I'm really interested in hearing this one.
  • DBerriesDBerries Posts: 26
    You pulled hulk Matt you lucky SOB. With love, dingleberriez
  • VoltronVoltron Posts: 12
    So if its passive over time, shouldnt this also include Iceman's coldsnap as its placed passively on each opponent?
  • Voltron wrote: »
    So if its passive over time, shouldnt this also include Iceman's coldsnap as its placed passively on each opponent?
    Coldsnap isn’t a passive debuff, it’s an active one, you get Willpower healing off of it.
  • FactorQFactorQ Posts: 99
    Second pic looks working as intended. Can you try to get a different screenshot against Magik? It seems to me that the numbers shown are the health lost from suicides and gain from willpower on Magik, not Hulk ragnarok.
Sign In or Register to comment.