Don't You Guys Think New Champs Are Increasing At A Rapid Rate

Well I remember how the old game used to be less champs more fun, but now the new champs are increasing at a rapid rate , and there is no fun . Every month new champs come , and we focus on them and forget about the previous ones .
I remember Kabam Said That "They don't want few champs To Rule or Control The Game" . But what is happening right now , still there are few champs which are controlling and the game and very small group of champs which are of some specific use .
So I think kabam should stop giving new champs every month and work on something bigger .Because most of the champs are so uncommon to most of the player base.

Comments

DarkArrow07

I think one new one a month would be perfect.

Primmer79

I believe this is part of the reason of them restricting the champs in 5*, and expect champs to be restricted in 6*.

Also, your last point as far as being uncommon is how the game is built. Fairly common for whales, f2p and lower players usually have to wait the time for them to enter the basic crystal, and then the time to get them

CoatHang3r

Uh, champions have been coming at the same rate for years now without change. Also those champions are what fuels the game by giving people something to grind for and pay for. Might as well argue water is too wet brah.

NastyEfnNate

2 champs a month for 2 years. You guys noobs?

Riegel

Why do you forget about the previous ones? Just because Blade is good doesn't mean I would flip my **** if I finally duped my 5* magik, because she's still that good. Neither rule or control the game, but they both do have more usable situations than others.

Honestly, for me, if they just keep doing tuning changes on old champs that would be great. I don't see a problem with the rate champs come out. The new ones aren't always that great, just look at sentry lol.

Riegel

That is if they keep updating old champs. Many of them are 100% completely useless.

TillerTheKiller

It has always been 2 new champs a month with the odd case of 3 sometimes. Yes they are always better than current champs because they have to give people a reason to spend $10 per FGMC.

Riegel

They aren't always better.

MarzGroove

TillerTheKiller wrote: »

It has always been 2 new champs a month with the odd case of 3 sometimes. Yes they are always better than current champs because they have to give people a reason to spend $10 per FGMC.

So Carnage came after Gwenpool...

MarzGroove

MarzGroove wrote: »

TillerTheKiller wrote: »

It has always been 2 new champs a month with the odd case of 3 sometimes. Yes they are always better than current champs because they have to give people a reason to spend $10 per FGMC.

So Carnage came after Gwenpool...

And Sentry came after Medusa....

Bosley

It would appear that KABAM equates new champs with crystal purchases and therefore the introductions are cash grabs, pure and simple.

mum_m2

new champions bring $$$'s though. $$$ keep the game up for all of us to enjoy. i think they just need to get more creative in terms of reducing the pool of champions in a crystal and allowing us to select the crystal by class.

Zuko_ILC

I like the 2 champs a month, only thing I don't like is that I can't keep up with ranking anyone right now. T1a's and t4bs just aren't enough to keep up with all the new champs. Its 10 t1as to rank 1 champ to r3 which isn't fun at all right now. I have 62 5* champs but too many at r1 at this stage in the game.