Alliance War Season 2 Points - 3rd time
Namo10
Member Posts: 28
3rd time, I am now not addressing anyone. Please do not take this thread down!
Not a regular forum user but this time I'll try and abide by the rules and not name any alliances or anyone.
Sequence of events:
- Season 1 done and dusted rewards handed out.
- End of Season 1 a particular alliance received retrospective rewards having been a victim of matchmaking algorithm.
- It was argued that, had they participated, they would've at least earned 100% participation rewards/points despite win/lose.
- Season 2 kicks off, end of the first week the 'hammer' was dropped and points/war rating etc were reduced on certain alliances that had violated the ToCs.
- Opponents of these alliances however are given this explanation, and I quote - 'we cannot be sure that if no violations had occurred, your alliance would have won that war'
- This explanation could be found in the following link: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/401217#Comment_401217
- Therefore no points are restored for the opposing alliances.
Now I am humbly asking, how would you have known, looking back if that specific alliance in Season 1 would've even accumulated 100% in those two missed wars to actually receive the retrospective rewards? Sure you could tell me that due to ToCs you are unable to discuss this matter publicly but the point stands, and I am using logic given above, I'll repeat, how would you have known if that specific alliance in Season 1 would've even accumulated 100% in the two missed wars to be rewarded them later? and eventually through the 'manual' calculation receiving top 3 rewards.
Speaking on behalf of my alliance and those that are in our position, a little consistency would be appreciated. Go ahead punish anyone that is violating your ToCs, in fact ban them for life I do not care, I welcome it! I am speaking about every account in the game, with no exceptions.
If equivalent treatment isn't a common application across the platform, then why do we even participate? It's just a discouraging show of affairs which does not represent your so called 'principles'.
For the ones saying, chin up and stop moaning, this again!!?? Yes I agree absolutely, we'll just look forward and participate in the season...but I leave the above treatment to your judgement...don't you think it's double standards?
Not a regular forum user but this time I'll try and abide by the rules and not name any alliances or anyone.
Sequence of events:
- Season 1 done and dusted rewards handed out.
- End of Season 1 a particular alliance received retrospective rewards having been a victim of matchmaking algorithm.
- It was argued that, had they participated, they would've at least earned 100% participation rewards/points despite win/lose.
- Season 2 kicks off, end of the first week the 'hammer' was dropped and points/war rating etc were reduced on certain alliances that had violated the ToCs.
- Opponents of these alliances however are given this explanation, and I quote - 'we cannot be sure that if no violations had occurred, your alliance would have won that war'
- This explanation could be found in the following link: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/401217#Comment_401217
- Therefore no points are restored for the opposing alliances.
Now I am humbly asking, how would you have known, looking back if that specific alliance in Season 1 would've even accumulated 100% in those two missed wars to actually receive the retrospective rewards? Sure you could tell me that due to ToCs you are unable to discuss this matter publicly but the point stands, and I am using logic given above, I'll repeat, how would you have known if that specific alliance in Season 1 would've even accumulated 100% in the two missed wars to be rewarded them later? and eventually through the 'manual' calculation receiving top 3 rewards.
Speaking on behalf of my alliance and those that are in our position, a little consistency would be appreciated. Go ahead punish anyone that is violating your ToCs, in fact ban them for life I do not care, I welcome it! I am speaking about every account in the game, with no exceptions.
If equivalent treatment isn't a common application across the platform, then why do we even participate? It's just a discouraging show of affairs which does not represent your so called 'principles'.
For the ones saying, chin up and stop moaning, this again!!?? Yes I agree absolutely, we'll just look forward and participate in the season...but I leave the above treatment to your judgement...don't you think it's double standards?
6
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I'm sure it would be framed as too much work, but I don't buy that story. People said it was too much work to identify cheaters and pilots as well. *shrug*
Not so sure. I think they chose to close them because I may have named someone. In any case, the closest I got to an answer is here which I am finding hard to accept:
https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/401217#Comment_401217
Now, the situation you are referencing is not at all related or comparable to what we're talking about now. You're talking about a situation where, because of systems in place, an Alliance was totally unable to compete in every war. This is not what we're discussing here. As we have already mentioned, it is not possible for us to determine how an Alliance is affected when coming up against another Alliance that may or may not have been playing honestly.
It's not possible to determine the outcome, and we will not be taking any further actions on this.
I know this is not the answer you're hoping to hear, but this is the decision that has been made.