Yes, one new champ per month would be nice. Quality over quantity.
i total agree with this... 1 champ more then enough... i would prefer the bug fixed!!
new champs = new bugs, they can't fix in time, so its better to just have 1 per month...
I'm still waiting for DOMINO block fix......... when kabam?
I would like to see one updated champ and one new champ a month
I’ve never agreed with anyone in this forum this much before
It's interesting. Is there enough old champs we want updated to do one per month? I can think of a handful of champs that really NEED an update, some that could use a little enhancement, and some that don't. But, I don't know how far we'd go updating a champ per month as well as one new champ per month. The focus is making sure there's time for better testing and QA with the release of new champs and for the game integrity as a whole. Any way, just my further thoughts on that.
Yes, one new champ per month would be nice. Quality over quantity.
Regardless if it was an update per month or longer, it would just be interesting to keep old champs from being solely arena fodder. The new ideas for sig abilities and buffs have definitely made some very interesting and fun new champs as the develop of the game progressed. It would just be fun to add more of that experience and creativity to the abilities of older champs. Luke Cage and Red Hulk were a nice start. Would be intrigued to see more of it. Open up a character redesign/design contest to the community to give the team more ideas to incorporate into old or future champs directly from the players who support the game and understand the mechanics.
Regardless if it was an update per month or longer, it would just be interesting to keep old champs from being solely arena fodder. The new ideas for sig abilities and buffs have definitely made some very interesting and fun new champs as the develop of the game progressed. It would just be fun to add more of that experience and creativity to the abilities of older champs. Luke Cage and Red Hulk were a nice start. Would be intrigued to see more of it. Open up a character redesign/design contest to the community to give the team more ideas to incorporate into old or future champs directly from the players who support the game and understand the mechanics.
Yes, one new champ per month would be nice. Quality over quantity.
Not sure if everyone has voted on this that wants to, but I'd like to see more votes if I can, then maybe let this fade out. Any additional comments welcome as well. I do hope Kabam is seeing and at least considering suggestions like this. I really hope they don't plan on going back to normal operation after they fix the recent issues. After the beginning of this month, it's so much more than obvious that something needs to change. Maybe if they can get their development and bugs under control, improve communication, pace things better, and give us better value for the money, I may consider spending again...but that's up to them.
Too many? No! I want more! Give me more! How about 5 per month???
2 new heroes per month is too little for this game, I think even other games bring 5 6 new characters per month, but this game unfortunately makes very stingy behavior unfortunately for this game
For everyone who is saying doing one and buff one, what does that resolve? It wouldn't free up any time for Kabam to fix any of the "issues"
I don't think the game has so many input issues that make it overly detrimental to the game. Did I fight a Hulkling in BGs where I missed so many dash backs it made me look like a terrible player? Yes. But taking the focus from a new champ to an overhauled one ends Kabam up in the same place.
Money is the biggest reason this will never change. Even if they buff an old champ, it isn't going to drive earnings into Kabam's account because many people already have the old champ.
For everyone who is saying doing one and buff one, what does that resolve? It wouldn't free up any time for Kabam to fix any of the "issues"
I don't think the game has so many input issues that make it overly detrimental to the game. Did I fight a Hulkling in BGs where I missed so many dash backs it made me look like a terrible player? Yes. But taking the focus from a new champ to an overhauled one ends Kabam up in the same place.
Money is the biggest reason this will never change. Even if they buff an old champ, it isn't going to drive earnings into Kabam's account because many people already have the old champ.
The people saying 1 new and 1 buff posted their thoughts in 2018, perhaps they would have different opinions today.
While there are lingering issues in the game, it should be pointed out that the people who designed and built the Champions aren't the same people who are designing and building the quests. Those are separate teams.
Also they get their orders from higher-ups as well as final approval from Marvel themselves. So unless Marvel says to take it down to one Champion a month, it's not going to change.
Too many? No! I want more! Give me more! How about 5 per month???
I actually enjoy December only having one champ. But honestly one each month may not always be the best plan. I think it'd be nice and plausible if they switched it to every three months instead of once a year. So that'd be March June September December one champ released.
Comments
new champs = new bugs, they can't fix in time, so its better to just have 1 per month...
I'm still waiting for DOMINO block fix......... when kabam?
Would you care to explain why? I'd like to discourage thoughtless comments that are not useful to the discussion.
Thanks
It's interesting. Is there enough old champs we want updated to do one per month? I can think of a handful of champs that really NEED an update, some that could use a little enhancement, and some that don't. But, I don't know how far we'd go updating a champ per month as well as one new champ per month. The focus is making sure there's time for better testing and QA with the release of new champs and for the game integrity as a whole. Any way, just my further thoughts on that.
Completely agree!
For everyone who is saying doing one and buff one, what does that resolve? It wouldn't free up any time for Kabam to fix any of the "issues"
I don't think the game has so many input issues that make it overly detrimental to the game. Did I fight a Hulkling in BGs where I missed so many dash backs it made me look like a terrible player? Yes. But taking the focus from a new champ to an overhauled one ends Kabam up in the same place.
Money is the biggest reason this will never change. Even if they buff an old champ, it isn't going to drive earnings into Kabam's account because many people already have the old champ.
Also they get their orders from higher-ups as well as final approval from Marvel themselves. So unless Marvel says to take it down to one Champion a month, it's not going to change.