Naming issue

So the whole naming issue doesn’t break kabam’s terms of service. Unless someone can show me in the terms of service where it specificity says names can’t be similar. How can it be deemed unfair when the defenders are meant to be a mystery in the first place. Just because you have top ranking alliances complaint about it, you go right ahead and make a fix for something that isn’t breaking rules. Again unless I’m wrong about the rule. I just hate seeing how kabam caters to top players, who are also top spenders, but don’t give us lowlifes like myself in gold 1 rank the time of day when we bring up an issue. Equal treatment please, and if a rule isn’t being broken don’t mess with it and fix other issues that have been plaguing the game forever.

Comments

Mhykke

Huh?

DarthPhal

DirkManhood wrote: »

So the whole naming issue doesn’t break kabam’s terms of service. Unless someone can show me in the terms of service where it specificity says names can’t be similar. How can it be deemed unfair when the defenders are meant to be a mystery in the first place. Just because you have top ranking alliances complaint about it, you go right ahead and make a fix for something that isn’t breaking rules. Again unless I’m wrong about the rule. I just hate seeing how kabam caters to top players, who are also top spenders, but don’t give us lowlifes like myself in gold 1 rank the time of day when we bring up an issue. Equal treatment please, and if a rule isn’t being broken don’t mess with it and fix other issues that have been plaguing the game forever.

If it wasn’t an unfair advantage, you should have no problem with them doing away with the practice.

ZzyzxGuy

It wasn't against the ToS. That's why no one is being punished.

Now, it's against the rules.

Why is this such a hard concept to grasp?

unknown

This content has been removed.